Pernahkah hangpa dengaq portal berita disaman pasai komen pembacanya? dan didenda RM 1/2 juta, perlu dibayar dalam tempoh 3 hari? Mahkamah Persekutuan memutuskan bahawa Malaysiakini bertanggungjawab kerana menghina mahkamah menerusi komen pembacanya. Ini merupakan kali pertama Malaysiakini menghadapi tuduhan menghina mahkamah sepanjang 21 tahun penubuhannya. Pada 15 Jun tahun lalu, Peguam Negara, Idrus Harun mengemukakan permohonan menghina mahkamah terhadap portal berita tersebut
Malaysiakini has been fined RM500,000 for contempt of court in relation to the news portal's readers' comments. "We are of the view that a fine of RM500,000 is appropriate. "We order the fine by the first respondent to be paid within three days from Monday (next week)," Court of Appeal president Rohana Yusuf said.
Malaysiakini launched a fundraiser to raise the said amount.The fundraiser was to help the news portal pay for a RM500,000 fine after the Federal Court found Malaysiakini liable for contemptuous comments by its readers.
Malaysiakini has exceeded its RM500,000 fundraising target in under five hours. The rakyat has spoken. The people are watching. For letting so many felons go, punish PN in the next GE.
Satu hari saja, 505k. Apakah indikator yang dapat ditafsirkan disebalik kemurahan orang ramai menghulurlan derma membantu portal berkenaan???...
1. Mungkin penderma simpati merasakan denda sebanyak itu tidak patut dan melampau.
2. Ia menunjukkan kebencian rakyat kepada gomen hari ini makin membara.
3. Petanda ini menggambarkan gomen pimpinan Din Yassin bakan hanyut. - minah kerang
Big Mama kena bukti dia tak bersalah...
Isteri bekas PM Najib Razak, Rosmah Mansor diarah membela diri atas tuduhan penyelewengan dana bagi projek pembekalan dan pemasangan tenaga solar di 369 sekolah luar bandar di Sarawak.
Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur, Mohamed Zaini Mazlan membuat keputusan itu selepas mendapati pihak pendakwaan berjaya mewujudkan prima facie bagi ketiga-tiga kes tersebut. "Pihak pendakwa berjaya membuktikan kes prima facie terhadap tertuduh ke atas ketiga-tiga pertuduhan." "Dengan ini saya memanggil tertuduh untuk membela diri," kata Zaini.
Rosmah, memilih untuk memberikan keterangan sumpah dari kandang saksi. Ini setelah Hakim Mohd Zaini memerintahkannya untuk membela diri. Suaminya Najib Razak berada di dalam mahkamah untuk memberikan sokongan moralnya.
Rosmah, 69, dibicarakan atas satu tuduhan meminta RM187.5 juta dan dua tuduhan menerima rasuah RM6.5 juta berkaitan projek bernilai RM1.25 bilion itu daripada bekas Pengarah Urusan Jepak Holdings Sdn Bhd Saidi Abang Samsudin.
Rasuah terbabit didakwa diterima menerusi bekas pegawai khasnya Rizal Mansor sebagai upah membantu Jepak Holdings memperoleh Projek Bersepadu Sistem Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Hibrid, serta Penyelenggaraan dan Operasi Genset/Diesel bagi 369 sekolah luar bandar Sarawak, bernilai RM1.25 bilion secara rundingan terus daripada Kementerian Pendidikan.
Perbuatan itu didakwa dilakukan di Lygon Cafe, Sunway Putra Mall, Jalan Putra; di kediamannya di Jalan Langgak Duta, Taman Duta dan di Seri Perdana, Persiaran Seri Perdana, Presint 10, Putrajaya antara Januari 2016 dan September 2017. - mk
Now Rosmah Is Guilty
Until Proven Innocent...
Rosmah ordered by High Court to submit defence on corruption charges RM1.25b project for electricity to 369 schools in Sarawak. High Court judge Mohd Zaini Mazlan said prosecution proven prima facie case on all three charges, including soliciting bribe.
“It is my finding that the prosecution has adduced credible evidence to prove every element of the offences under the three charges, which, if unrebutted, warrants a conviction” said Zaini.
Zaini also admitted the “Can I advise you something” audio clips as evidence. The prosecution applied to admit audio clip to show Rosmah’s “overbearing” nature.
Rosmah's has 3 options ...
a. sworn evidence can be cross-examined
b. unsworn statement
c. remain silent.
Rosmah chose to give a sworn statement
So folks since Rosmah's defense has been called it means at this juncture the Court sees her as guilty of all charges.
“It is my finding that the prosecution has adduced credible evidence to prove every element of the offences under the three charges, which, if unrebutted, warrants a conviction” said High Court judge Mohd Zaini Mazlan.
Rosmah has chosen to give a sworn statement from the accused dock. The lawyers should tell us what this means and the pros and cons of an accused person resorting to this type of defense.
Rosmah has chosen to read a statement from the dock because she cannot find sufficient witnesses who can testify in her favour. - Syed Akbar Ali
Pengajaran dan pembelajaran Didik TV ntv7...
DAP rep files MACC report on
Rina Harun's 'source of wealth'...
A day after questioning Women, Family and Community Development Minister Rina Harun's source of wealth, DAP's Canning assemblyperson Jenny Choy proceeded to file a report urging the MACC to probe the minister. Rina has been in the spotlight after she settled her debts to a Paris-based film company around RM1.3 million to avoid being declared bankrupt.
Choy had publicly asked Rina how she managed to accumulate the settlement amount in a short period of 15 months as Rina's assets declaration data showed her assets at RM72,000 when the data was made public in November 2019.
"Referring to MACC's asset declaration data in November 2019, Rina declared that her assets stood at RM72,000 with a monthly income of RM34,004.48. "If Rina's source of income did not change, she will need approximately 40 months to collect enough funds to pay off her debts without spending a sen of her income. "As being a cabinet minister and public servant, MACC should show its responsibility and take immediate action to probe her," she said in a statement.
Choy, DAP Youth's vice-chief, urged MACC to investigate if Rina had received an additional income source. She filed the report at the MACC office in Ipoh.
Paris-based Sarl Novovision sued Rina on Nov 8, 2018, demanding that the full amount owed be paid by July 31, 2019. The claim was for several films, comedy shows and documentaries in the comedy genre sold to three companies in which Rina was director.
Rina was served a bankruptcy notice for debts owed to Sarl Novovision to the tune of RM1,340,642.02 as of Nov 17, 2020. Rina, who was one of the directors of the now-defunct companies, Eurofine (M) Sdn Bhd, Fine Mobile Network Sdn Bhd and Fine TV Network Sdn Bhd, had purchased several comedy shows and documentaries from the French company.
In May 2014, Rina and another company director, Ida Rahayu Md Noor, had entered into a guarantee agreement with Sarl Novovision that they would personally and jointly undertake all liabilities of the companies. However, the companies were closed down between December 2013 and August 2015, respectively. - mk
cheers.
No comments:
Post a Comment