18 November 2022

The hidden blessings of Sheraton Move...


It’s awful to say this, but if Pakatan Harapan wins in GE15, it could be because of Sheraton Move. Like many Malaysians, I could not forget the night of 23 February 2020 as I saw MPs entering Sheraton Hotel smiling and waving as they completed the final plot to overthrow a democratically-elected PH government through mass defections.

The protracted week of negotiations, backstabbing, lying, crying, horse-trading and interviewing that led to an entirely new government left a permanent scar in my psyche. I could not see Sheraton Move as anything else than what it was – treachery of the highest order by a group of dishonest and self-interested politicians.

But I saw a graph two weeks ago that made me ask an uncomfortable question: Could Sheraton Move have been a good thing for the primary victim, PH? Merdeka Center had been tracking government approval ratings with sufficient one- to three-month intervals since PH first came to power in 2018. This meant that we could compare how people felt about the three governments of PH, PN, and BN in the past four years.

No government in recent history has been as popular at PH during its first two months of administration, as euphoria painted the sky in our first ever government change since independence.But this popularity took a dramatic crash in the next 20 months, ending only with a 30% approval rate in its final month before Sheraton Move swept them out of power. If an election was called then, nobody would bet on a PH victory. PH avoided two global crises and looked better in the end

Whether it was an expectation-reality mismatch, underperformance and/or inexperience, but the people were much happier when Muhyiddin took over, as PN’s government enjoyed an above 55% approval rating during its first year.


But things plunged rapidly from April 2021 onwards, reaching an all-time low of 34% in July 2021. This was when the violent Omicron variant hit, putting Covid-19 cases past one million, making Malaysia’s per-million deaths Southeast Asia’s highest; hospitals became a disaster movie. The lockdowns economically distressed many, with suicide rates soaring to record highs, and starving Malaysians put out white flags to plea for help.

Ismail Sabri’s government took over as the economy looked for ways to recover from the once-in-a-lifetime pandemic-induced downturn. Ismail’s government was never able to breach 50% in approval ratings, and the dissatisfaction rate rose to the highest level of 64% at the height of inflation (July 2022). The war in Ukraine and unexpected lockdowns in China disrupted the supply chains, driving food prices sky high. Cooking oil, eggs, and creamer had double digit price increases. We ran out of chicken.

Without Sheraton Move, the unpopular PH government would have had to govern through the life-threatening Covid-19 crisis and an inflation, both of which were due more to external events that were highly uncontrollable, but which governments typically take full blame. Now, three major coalitions that governed in the past four years are compared by how well they’ve done during their tenure, and most importantly, how the people felt during those periods.

While PH’s governance was associated with lackluster pace in reforms, its administration now looks better compared to Muhyiddin’s Covid-19 dark and bitter statistics, as well as Ismail’s angry inflation period.


Other than yanking PH out of these unavoidable global crises, Sheraton Move also allowed people to reflect on their performance with more distance and objectivity, and to soften how they felt about PH, in direct contrast to PN and BN governments that were closer in time.

Besides making PH look better with the power of nostalgia, Sheraton Move also produced two other benefits to PH: Split its opponents and lowered the threshold for victory. When the deal was struck to orchestrate Sheraton Move, rule-breaking behaviors were normalized. Chief among them was the notion that every politician deserves to be in the cabinet, and they would withdraw support and threaten the party if their demands were not met.

By validating politicians’ egoistic pursuit of wealth and influence in cabinet positions, large-scale internal and external party feuds happened between PN and BN. A new faction within Umno was formed purely to defend their positions against other party vultures, and they were known as the “ministerial cluster.” Those not aligned with Umno president Zahid Hamidi were dropped as candidates, and they either made Zahid the target enemy, cried betrayal, or ran on the opponent’s ticket altogether.

Despite the logical electoral benefit of a PN-BN partnership, talks also fell through as Umno and PAS started blaming each other for the government’s faults and corruption, and name-calling occurred to a grave degree between them that a ceasefire was called. Such schisms could not have existed without Sheraton Move that legitimized the lust for power and made the coalitions realize that they could not work together or compete for the same voter base.

Before Sheraton Move, Umno-PAS was working intimately under Muafakat Nasional. After Sheraton Move, greed was unleashed and celebrated, splitting the oldest Malay-Muslim parties and normalizing nationwide three-cornered fights.


A more competitive election meant that the Malay votes are split, thus improving PH’s chances to win with only a quarter of Malay votes. The endless feuds also made the uneventful PH appear stable in comparison. 

Sheraton Move opened the floodgates of greed, and PH now benefits.The final benefit of Sheraton Move is the birth of the anti-party hopping law (AHL) that improved the rules of the game. The intensity and frequency of party defections made parties realize they were all losers in a zero-sum game if they could not keep the MPs they’ve helped win.

Though imperfect, the AHL, in effect from 5 October 2022, makes it a constitutional requirement for an MP to vacate his/her seat if they join another political party. This helped lower the threshold for victory. A PH that wins only 90 seats under AHL environments is more secure than a PH that has 121 seats in 2018 but MPs were still allowed to defect to another party.

AHL helps PH cement its seats and influence, thus making it more attractive for East Malaysian parties to strike a partnership to form government. That also meant PH needs fewer seats as its seats are now stabler seats. What good was Sheraton Move? The grave affront to our democracy that broke all rules and conventions turned out to be beneficial to the primary victims, PH.

It helped provide a contrast to other governments that governed during worst crises and made PH look better in comparison, besides splitting the opponents through the floodgates of greed, and lowered the threshold of victory by improving the rules of the game. If PH goes on to win GE15, it could be because of Sheraton Move. - MySinchew 

Vote out BN,it has ‘unfinished business’...

The biggest political blunder BN made after the 14th general election (GE14) was to actively participate in the Sheraton Move. The people had made their voices heard in the last polls and BN should have accepted the verdict.

The results of the GE14 were a strong signal to BN that it was time to take a breather and rebuild itself. It should have respected the will of the majority and accepted that the people had consigned it to another role - namely to become the opposition.

Thus, BN should have had the magnanimity to accept the decision, take up the role of an opposition and start a process of rebuilding itself and to proof itself as a great opposition.

After all, in a vibrant democracy, people will choose whom they want as the government and whom to become opposition. Both are key and important roles for a good democratic government.

The results of GE13 itself were a strong message to BN from people but it did not change from 2013 to 2018. And since BN was not prepared to change while being in the government, voters decided to give them a clean break in the GE14 from the responsibility of governing to that of the opposition.The idea perhaps was to give them time and space to reflect and evolve to gain the confidence of the people to be elected as the next government.


But alas, this was not meant to be. Instead of pushing the reset button and putting it on a path to resurgence, BN was “seduced” to be part of a conspiracy to topple a legitimate government and become part of an unelected government.That act, in hindsight, was a fatal move.

Today BN is in a pickle. The stink in the form of leaders embroiled in corruption is still part of its main leadership and this appears to be repulsive to voters.The change in BN that the people thought they would undertake after the defeat in GE14 did not materialise.

So, BN has some “unfinished business” in the form of a makeover, and it needs a clean break from governing one more time for a period of five years. Hence, voters should deliver a clear message to BN on Nov 19 that they should take time off from governing and take a different role which is to become opposition.

They should use the next five years to rebuild themselves, bring fresh young talent into their fold and start preparing for the 16th general election. I do not believe there are angels in politics, only devils. The choice voters have is to choose the lesser of the evils to be their leaders.

For GE15, that “lesser evil” is Pakatan Harapan. And maybe in GE16, after a clean makeover, BN would have a chance to regain their lost lustre. All that, they will need to prove to voters in the next general election that they are the “lesser evil” compared to the rest. - SP Nathan






cheers.

No comments: