Deepak beli barang kemas RM13 juta untuk Rosmah sebagai sogokan utk mudahkan urusniaga tanah...

PKR hari ini mendedahkan bukti pemindahan wang oleh ahli perniagaan, Deepak Jaikishan kepada dua syarikat barangan kemas mewah di Hong Kong berjumlah kira-kira RM13 juta, dikatakan untuk isteri Perdana Menteri, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor sebagai ganjaran bagi satu urusniaga tanah.

Pengarah Strategi, Rafizi Ramli pada sidang media di ibu pejabat parti pagi ini, menunjukkan salinan invois dan pembayaran oleh dua syarikat Deepak, Karpet Raya Sdn Bhd dan Carpet Plus Sdn Bhd kepada Dehres Ltd dan Firestone Co Ltd.

Salinan itu, antara lain tertera invois bernombor 23117 dan slip pindahan wang sejumlah USD115,000 kepada Dehres Ltd oleh Carpet Raya Sdn Bhd.

Beberapa invois dari Firestone Co Ltd bagi pembelian 19 barangan kemas bernilai kira-kira RM13 juta turut ditunjukkan.

Satu salinan emel dari kakitangan Dehres Ltd juga menyebut nama Rosmah. Rafizi menggesa pihak berkuasa menyiasat sepenuhnya. 

Inilah cincin berlian tersebut sebagaimana terkandung dalam dokumen pembelian.

“Dakwaan Deepak bahawa beliau membayar pembelian barang kemas mewah berjumlah RM13 juta dalam tempoh tiga bulan untuk Rosmah sangat serius, apatah lagi beliau (Deepak) menampilkan dokumen sebagai bukti,” kata Rafizi.-keadilan daily

Rosmah didesak jawab dakwaan Deepak beli barang kemas RM13juta.

PKR dedah dokumen pembelian berlian...

PKR hari ini mendedahkan beberapa dokumen mengenai pemindahan wang yang dibuat oleh syarikat-syarikat ahli perniagaan, Deepak Jaikishan.

Pemindahan wang  oleh Carpet Raya Sdn Bhd dan Carpet Plus Sdn Bhd  kepada syarikat-syarikat barang kemas mewah di Hong Kong itu dikaitkan dengan isteri Perdana Menteri, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansur yang dibayar oleh beliau.

Bagaimanapun, nama Rosmah tidak tercatat dalam mana-mana slip pemindahan wang tersebut.

Ini kerana, segala serahan pembelian itu dibuat kepada orang tengah termasuk di Singapura.

Isnin lepas, sebuah buku bertajuk 'Black Ros 1.0' mula disebarkan yang juga mengandungi cerita dan dokumen berkaitan pembelian belian sebegini.

Buku ini merupakan siri pertam kerana menurut sumber, sebuah lagi buku bertajuk 'Black Megic Woman' pula akan diterbitkan.

Namun, Pengarah strategi PKR, Rafizi Ramli menunjukkan salah-satu dokumen tersebut yang mengandungi satu email dari seorang kakitangan sebuah syarikat permata di Hong Kong yang mempunyai nama Rosmah.

"Dokumen yang ada dengan saya ini turut mengandungi invois dan penyata hutang dari dua buah syarikat barang kemas mewah di Hong Kong iaitu Firestone Co Ltd dan Dehres Ltd," kata beliau dalam sidang media di Ibu pejabat PKR, Tropicana hari ini.

Menurut Rafizi, invois Dehres Ltd dialamatkan dan dibilkan kepada sebuah syarikat kawalan Deepak, bagi pembelian satu lot berlian bernilai USD115,000 (bersamaan RM408,250).
"Carpet Raya Sdn Bhd membayar jumlah yang sama iaitu USD115,000 kepada Dehres Ltd seperti yang dibuktikan dengan slip permohonan kiriman wang oleh Carpet Raya Sdn Bhd," katanya.

Dokumen juga mengandungi beberapa invois dari Firestone Co Ltd. Salah satunya adalah bertarikh 10 Mac 2009 bagi pembelian beberapa barang kemas. Salah satu dari barang kemas yang dibeli adalah cincin berlian bernombor Lot DR2763.

Pembelian barang-barang kemas mewah bernilai USD1.5 juta (bersamaan RM5.325 juta) dibayar dengan beberapa kiriman wang seperti yang dibutirkan di dalam penyata hutang yang dikeluarkan oleh Firestone Co. Ltd.

"Kiriman wang kepada Firestone Co. Ltd. bertarikh 14 April 2009 itu padan dengan slip permohonan kiriman wang yang dibuat oleh Carpet Raya Sdn Bhd bertarikh 13 April 2009.

"Ini menguatkan dakwaan Deepak bahawa pembelian barang kemas mewah dari Firestone Co. Ltd. dibayar oleh beliau melalui syarikat-syarikatnya," kata Rafizi lagi.

Justeru, Rafizi menegaskan, dakwaan Deepak bahawa beliau membayar pembelian barang kemas mewah berjumlah RM13 juta dalam tempoh 3 bulan oleh Rosmah adalah satu dakwaan yang sangat serius, apatah lagi apabila beliau menampilkan dokumen-dokumen sebagai bukti.

"Sebab itu, tindakan tergopoh-gapah Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak yang mengheret dana pencen anggota tentera untuk membayar RM160 juta kepada Deepak dan Ketua Wanita Umno Selangor seolah-olah mengiyakan pandangan umum bahawa beliau mula panik dengan pendedahan yang dibuat oleh Deepak," katanya.

Beliau juga berkata, perkara ini wajar disiasat sepenuhnya dan beberapa laporan kepada pihak berkuasa akan dibuat dalam tempoh seminggu dari sekarang berkenaan perkara ini agar ia dapat disiasat segera.-harakahdaily

PKR kemuka bukti dokumen pembelian barang kemas seperti didakwa Deepak

Answer RM13mil Jewel-gate claim, Rosmah told...

PKR has demanded that Rosmah Mansor responds to claims by carpet trader Deepak Jaikishin that he had paid RM13 million to purchase jewellery for her in 2008 and 2009.

Deepak (right) is said to have claimed that the purchase of 19 pieces of custom-made jewellery from two firms in Hong Kong is part of alleged kickbacks to grease a land deal.

"It is of public interest that both Rosmah and Deepak come clean," PKR director of strategy Rafizi Ramli told a press conference at the party headquarters in Petaling Jaya today.

To back the allegation, Rafizi furnished documents that the party had obtained through intermediaries from Deepak.

He also pointed out that one document names Rosmah.

When contacted, an aide to Rosmah said he would have to check on the claim.

Based on preliminary checks, Rafizi said he believes the email communiques, invoices, account summaries and fund-transfer documents to be genuine.


The onus, he said is now on Deepak to furnish the authorities with original copies of the documents and other proof, so that an investigation can be carried out.

Deepak had told Malaysiakini earlier that he would lodge a report with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) later today.

Based on the documents, his companies, Carpet Raya Sdn Bhd and Carpet Plus Sdn Bhd, had paid for the jewellery.

"These are serious allegations," Rafizi said, noting that the documents and Deepak's claims warrant a probe.

Anticipating the possibility of a formal denial, Rafizi said it was not logical that the items were for Deepak’s use as “I have not seen (him) wearing rings and necklaces”.

PKR treasurer William Leong, who was present, urged the MACC to investigate the claim "without fear or favour" and prove that it is truly independent.

Failure to do so would show that it only investigates safe targets who have no political connections, he said.

He added that even without a report being lodged, the anti-graft body is empowered by its parent legislation to call in Deepak and compel him to furnish them with proof of his allegation.- malaysiakini

Deepak spent millions on gems for Rosmah

 

 cheers.

Anwar layak diberi peluang kedua...

Jika sesiapa yang perlu mendapat peluang kedua, orangnya,adalah Anwar Ibrahim. Beliau adalah seorang tokoh politik yang paling berjaya pernah dicipta UMNO.

Menonjolkan  dirinya sebagai suara yang sederhana negara Malaysia  dan berjaya mengekalkan sebuah pakatan rapuh terdiri daripada suara yang berbeza2, yang sama2  berikrar bahawa 'UMNO mesti pergi' , Anwar adalah 'pilihan rakyat' atau sekurang-kurangnya, beliau telah menyuntik satu harapan  besar  untuk para pengundi supaya membawa mereka ke satu  era baru yang bebas daripada cengkaman UMNO.

Seorang rakan UMNO bertanya, "Bukankah kestabilan bermaksud jalan tengah lagi?"

Sepatutnya soalan yang perlu dia tanya, "Apa yang menyebabkan UMNO yang  sombong percaya bahawa mereka boleh menentukan jalan tengah, selama-lamanya?"

Jika UMNO kalah, tidak bererti  bahawa  pengundi 2 berparti berpendapat bahawa Pakatan Rakyat adalah pilihan yang lebih baik untuk memimpin negara ini, ia mungkin benar  kerana bagi sesetengah orang, Pakatan Rakyat adalah satu-satunya alternatif kepada UMNO. Sama seperti UMNO telah menuduh sebahagian besar pengundi sebagai pengkhianat, kerana tidak menghargai jasa2nya.  Saya telah membuat hujah tentang sifat politik berparti di Malaysia dan apa yang dijajakan oleh parti2 ini.

Saya lebih suka menyambut era baru pertelingkahan politik mengikut paradigma dwi-gabungan (two-coalition) daripada menjadi tongkol dibawah pemerintahan UMNO yang lusuh lagi usang  yang selama bertahun-tahun telah memakan dirinya sendiri. Sekurang-kurangnya  di bawah Pakatan akan  ada perubahan,kerana Pakatan telah menunjukkan bahawa ia sedar akan kehendak2 rakyat.

Ini adalah perjuangan besar yang terakhir buat UMNO. Khabar2  angin di Kuala Lumpur  mengatakan bahawa UMNO sudah bersiap sedia  dengan dana untuk membiayai  mereka yang mahu lompat  parti. Pakatan mempunyai rekod yang lemah bila menghadapi isu ini. Kemelut September 16  adalah satu peringatan bahawa sebarang kemungkinan bakal berlaku.

Hari  dugaan buat UMNO sudah hampir,ia bukan saja merupakan  ujian untuk UMNO tetapi juga untuk mereka  dalam kem  pembangkang.  Amat mengejutkan dan  gembira  bagi saya jika UMNO  kalah, tetapi ujian sebenar bagi pembangkang  ialah jika UMNO menang atau lebih teruk  memperolehi semula majoriti  dua pertiga. Kiranya mana2 satu berlaku ia adalah satu era baru dalam politik tanah air. Dan tsunami politik 2008 telah mengubah segala2nya.

Tidak kira bagaimana UMNO cuba hendak  menghidupkan api  13 Mei dalam minda orang (baca tulisan Kua Kia Soong), namun pada realitinya rakyat akan melihat bahawa tsunami tahun 2008 sebagai titik perubahan dalam sejarah politik Malaysia.

Harapan Tahun Baru saya adalah - akan berlaku  satu lagi titik perubahan yang memihak kepada pembangkang.- S. Thayaparan,Malaysiakini.

(Abstrak di atas adalah sebahagian daripada artikel berjudul, "Umno's last tango before its reckoning"-S. Thayaparan,Malaysiakini diterjemahkan oleh TS.)

Anwar deserves second chance...

If anyone gets to have a second chance, it is Anwar Ibrahim. He is perhaps the most successful political operative Umno has ever created.

By reinventing himself as the voice of a moderate Malaysia and by sustaining (which takes leaderships skills never imagined by Umno) his fragile coalition made up of disparate voices united in their ‘Umno must go' harmony, it is Anwar who has some moral claim to the idea that he is the ‘people's choice' or at least a sizeable section of the voting public, to lead them into a much hoped for new Umno-free era.

A long-time articulate Umno friend asks, "Doesn't stability mean the middle ground, any more?" The question he should be asking is, "What led Umno to arrogantly believe that they could define the middle ground, forever?"

If Umno loses, it will not be because a partisan electorate thinks that Pakatan is a better choice to lead the country, it will be because for some, Pakatan (for a wide range of reasons) is the only alternative to Umno. Just as Umno has declared a certain section of the public as traitors, said section has returned the favour in spades. I have made this argument before of the partisan nature of Malaysian politics and what each coalition is peddling.

I would much rather usher in a new era of political squabbling a two-coalition paradigm offers than stagnate under a decrepit Umno who over the years has been devouring itself. At least in the former, there is a small possibility of change since Pakatan has demonstrated that it is aware of the will of the people.

At the end of the day, this is Umno's last great political fight. Already the rumour mills in Kuala Lumpur are in a frenzy of the war chest jealously guarded to fund party hopping initiatives. Pakatan has a poor record when it comes to this issue. Anwar's Sept 16 fiasco is a cogent reminder that the Umno apple does not fall far from the tree.

Very soon, Umno's day of reckoning will be not only a test for Umno but also for those of us in the opposition. It would surprise (and delight) me if Umno loses, but the real test for the opposition is if Umno wins or worse reclaims its mythical two-thirds majority. Either way, it will be a new era in politics. The political tsunami of 2008 has irrevocably changed things.

No matter how much Umno attempts to keep the malice of May 13 in the minds of people (Kua Kia Soong's work on the subject should be required reading for all right-thinking Malaysians), the reality is that people will remember the importance of the Tsunami of 2008 as a turning point in the history of Malaysia.

My New Year hope is that we have another turning point in favour of the opposition.- S. Thayaparan,Malaysiakini

(The above abstract being part of an article,"Umno's last tango before its reckoning"- S. Thayaparan.)





cheers.

Kalu Najib,SPRM dan Polis tak kan siasat, tapi kalu Anwar bukan setakat siasat,depa cekup terus masuk lokap...

Datuk Seri Najib Razak terlepas dari tindakan undang-undang sekalipun didedah berperanan dalam menarik balik akuan bersumpah P Balasubramaniam kerana beliau masih Perdana Menteri.

Sebaliknya, jika Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim yang menjadi sasaran pendedahan Deepak Jaikishan, Ketua Umum KEADILAN itu pasti dikenakan tindakan termasuk ditangkap.

Pada ceramah di Sungei Limau, Kulim, malam semalam, Setiausaha Agung KEADILAN, Datuk Saifuddin Nasution Ismail, berkata Najib langsung tidak disiasat, apatah lagi ditangkap.

“Ini membuktikan amalan double standard dalam sistem perundangan kerajaan Umno BN.

“Malah, Deepak tidak dipanggil untuk disiasat, baik polis atau SPRM. Tapi jika dakwaan melibatkan Anwar, percayalah dengan segera mereka geledah dan serbu Ketua Pembangkang.

“Kita akan tanya SPRM kenapa tak siasat walaupun Deepak sudah dedahkan bukti penglibatan Najib dalam isu SD Bala,” katanya.

Saifuddin berkata, pihak berkuasa melindungi Najib dan pemimpin Umno BN walaupun mereka terbukti terlibat dalam penyalahgunaan kuasa dan wang rakyat.

Beliau berkata, sikap berat sebelah itu jika dibiar berterusan akan merosakkan sistem keadilan dan perundangan di negara ini.

“Rakyat yang miskin dan tidak berwang akan menjadi mangsa kepada
sistem perundangan yang tidak adil.

“Jika tiada perubahan dalam PRU 13, musibah akan menimpa negara dan mendatangkan kesengsaraan lebih teruk kepada rakyat selama lima tahun akan datang,” katanya.-keadilandaily

 

 

 Private investigator P.Balasubramaniam (left) talking with his new lawyer Arulampalam Mariam Pillai after the press conference where he retracted the earlier statutory declaration

Only one man stands to gain from Bala's second SD...

Private eye P Balasubramaniam affirmed his first statutory declaration (SD) on July 1, 2008. It was released at a press conference held at the PKR headquarters on July 3 that year. It was 55 paragraphs long.

A host of personalities were mentioned in this first SD. They are as follows (in the sequence they appear); Abdul Razak Baginda; private investigator Ang; murdered Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaaribuu; Rowena Abdul Razak; Suras Kumar; Dhiren Norendra; Najib Razak; Lance Corporal Rohaniza; Azilah Hadri; Sirul Azahar; Amy; DSP Musa Safri; DSP Idris and ASP Tonny.

The second SD, which emerged a day later, purposefully referred to only seven of those 55 paragraphs set out in the first SD.

These seven paragraphs (8, 25, 28, 49, 50, 51 and 52), were specifically identified and transcribed, after which their contents were traversed in the order they appeared in the first SD. In other words, these paragraphs were intentionally extracted from the first SD, repeated and subsequently retracted by denial. No other details appearing in that first SD were touched upon or even mentioned.

It may be an unfortunate coincidence that each and every paragraph so traversed in the second SD specifically bore reference to Najib. Nothing of all the other personalities mentioned in the first SD was referred to. Only the details relating to Najib were set out in the second SD and retracted.

This, by a very rudimentary analysis, would lead any reasonably minded person to surmise that the personality standing to benefit from this partial second SD retraction must have been the one whose name had been mentioned in the paragraphs referred to above. There is no logical reason why anyone else would have been interested.

This, by a simple process of deduction, indicates that Najib or someone close enough to him, entrusted or vested with an interest to maintain and preserve a favourable public perception of him, must have been instrumental in the organisation of a very rapid attempt to stifle what must have been perceived as a formidable threat to his pending ascension to the position of prime minister.

Who drafted the second SD?

Unfortunately, matters such as this, if done in haste, will eventually unravel.

It has recently emerged that a lawyer(s) other than M Arunampalam, was/were involved in receiving instructions to formulate a ‘U-turn' SD to be signed by Balasubramaniam . It had been assumed Arunampalam was instrumental in the drafting of this second SD, for the simple reason he turned up purporting to represent Balasubramaniam at that infamous press conference held in the lobby of the Prince Hotel in the morning of July 4, 2008.

However, as we now know, carpet trader Deepak Jaikishan has dispelled that assumption. He has said Arunampalam was there basically as a stooge for the person(s) behind these shenanigans. He was used by Deepak as a player in the entire plot.

It is no secret Arunampalam has been Deepak's lawyer in certain property transactions in the past.

Appearing for someone he had never met and knew nothing about was probably a rather tenuous extension of the conveyancing portfolio he was handling for Deepak. Let's leave it at that.

We now know Arunalpalam didn't draft or prepare that second SD. Deepak has said so.

So who received instructions, ostensibly from Najib, or one or more of his cohorts, to do this?

Out of the 14,000 odd practising lawyers registered with the Bar Council, it can reasonably be assumed that only a handful of these lawyers would have had the privilege of being at the beck and call of Najib or his entourage.

We have now narrowed down the range of potential participants. This should assist the Bar Council in its endeavours to trace the culprit(s) who unilaterally and without instructions, drafted a false statutory declaration for my client to sign under circumstances in which the question of voluntariness remains highly suspect.

A revisit of the contents of that first SD is appropriate at this juncture.

Balasubramaniam's motives

What was the purpose of releasing that first SD? The answer lies in paragraph 54.

This paragraph sets out in detail the reasons why it was affirmed. These details need to be repeated so that the entire issue can be contextualised and afforded some prominence as it appears the wood is being ignored in favour of the trees and weeds.

The reason why Balasubramaniam affirmed this first SD was primarily due to the fact that the Altantuya murder trial was still on going at that stage and he was concerned that a massive cover-up was being orchestrated to detract from the most crucial question in the entire trial, the question which is still on everyone's lips until today... what was the motive for this murder?

Balasubramaniam's complaint was that although he had been called as a prosecution witness, he was not asked, during examination-in-chief or under cross-examination, fundamentally basic and pertinent questions relating to individuals who could throw some light on the chain of command.

Paragraph 54 of that first SD sets out the reasons why it was made and I reproduce those contents as follows: (Balasubramaniam said he wished to):

• State his disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya.

• Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there were individuals other than the three accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya.

• Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions' case.

• Emphasise the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police for 17 years, he was absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up his or her body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.

• Express his concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul, would not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.

Explanation needed

As it turns out, Balasubramaniam's predictions were rather accurate to a large extent.

Abdul Razak Baginda was acquitted at the end of the prosecutions' case and both Azilah and Sirul chose not to give evidence in their defence, which effectively meant they were not subject to cross examination. (They gave statements from the dock instead).

In other words, all three accused were spared the embarrassment of having to actually answer very relevant questions which would have revealed a motive for the murder. This is of course based on the assumption that the prosecution were ready and prepared to ask these very pertinent questions.

It is also rather intriguing to note that despite my making it very clear at that initial press conference that some of the material Balasubramaniam was alluding to was hearsay in the sense he was merely repeating what Razak Baginda had told him, these revelations have never been denied by Razak Baginda, despite having had every opportunity to do so once he had been acquitted.

What has been stated above is not intended to cast unwarranted aspersions on any individual involved but merely serves as an objective analysis of the circumstances surrounding this whole issue which I believe necessitates an explanation, especially in light of the recent revelations made by Deepak, all of which have yet to be disputed by the individuals named or implicated.

This reticence, unfortunately, only lends credence to these aspersions.-Americk Sidhu,Malaysiakini

 

 

 cheers.

Selamat datang 2013...

...and another chance for you to get it right....

2012 dalam kenangan...

Skandal Pusat Fidlot Kebangsaan (NFC)

- Ibu segala skandal melibatkan dana sejumlah RM250 juta.
- Ketua Wanita Umno yang juga bekas Menteri Pembagunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat Shahrizat Jalil didakwa mempunyai kepentingan dalam kelulusan projek penternakan lembu fidlot yang dianugerahkan kepada syarikat suaminya.
- Perdana Menteri Najib Razak pada 2007, ketika projek NFC diluluskan adalah Pengerusi Projek Impak Tinggi Negara. Timbalannya, Muhyiddin Yassin merupakan Menteri Pertanian yang meluluskan dana kepada NFC.
- Projek NFC hanya menternak sejumlah 8,016 ekor lembu dalam tempoh 2008 – 2010. Sepatutnya projek itu menghasilkan 60,000 ekor lembu setahun.
- Sebahagian besar dana didakwa dibelanjakan untuk membeli kereta mewah, percutian dan mendanai perniagaan keluarga Shahrizat di Singapura.

Demonstrasi Lynas, Kuantan

- Kumpulan anti kilang radioaktif Lynas membentuk NGO Himpunan Hijau
- Pada februari 2012 demonstrasi di beberapa buah Bandar utama dilakukan.
- Demonstrasi terbesar di Kuantan, mengumpul 20,000 peserta. Manakala himpunan di Kuala Lumpur dan Pulau Pinang 3,000 peserta
- Perjuangan menolak kilang nadir bumi melibatkan pemfailan kes di Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur tetapi mahkamah menolak semua kes
- Kerajaan memberi kelulusan lesen beroperasi sementara (TOL) kepada Lynas dan pada November 2012, loji Lynas menerima bahan mentah untuk diproses biar pun rakyat Malaysia menentang keras.

Demonstrasi Bersih 3.0

- Dianjur pada 28 April 2012.
- Menggesa 8 tuntutan dipenuhi agar pilihan raya ke 13 berlangsung dalam suasana bersih dan adil
- Mengumpul 300,000 peserta di pinggir Dataran Merdeka, Kuala Lumpur
- Tunjuk perasaan terbesar dalam sejarah. Ia dicemari dengan keganasan berleluasa polis pada sebelah petang ketika menyuraikan peserta demonstrasi

Skandal Scorpene

- Skandal pembelian Scorpene lanjutan dari pendedahan tahun 2008. Skandal terbongkar meluas melalui siasatan oleh hakim penyiasat Perancis Roger Le Loire. Najib adalah Menteri Pertahanan pada 2002 ketika Scorpene dibeli.
- Pada Mei 2012 Pengarah Eksekutif Suaram Cynthia Gabriel mendedahkan beberapa dokumen yang diperolehi dari peguam William Bourdon and Joseph Breham yang dilantik NGO itu untuk membuka kes rasuah pembeliankapal selam di antara syarikat Perancis DCNS dan syarikat kroni Najib, Perimekar Sdn Bhd milik Razak Baginda.
- Sejumlah dokumen ditemui pendakwa awam Perancis mengesahkan Menteri Pertahanan ketika itu, Najib meminta AS$1 bilion (RM3 bilion) daripada DCNS (anak syarikat pembuat kapal Perancis DCN) untuk Perimekar.
- Turut didedahkan Dokumen 87, Dokumen 97 dan Dokumen 136 yang mendedahkan mengenai urusan pemberian komisyen. Didedahkan Umno adalah penerima terbesar komisyen.

Skandal penyenaraian FGVH

- Penyenaraian Felda Global Ventures Holdings (FGVH) Berhad dibongkar oleh pengerusi Anak Mazlan Aliman pada April 2012.
- Penyenaraian didakwa melibatkan penggadaian 360,000 hektar tanah milik Felda seperti Felda Plantation dan tanah peneroka dicagar selama 99 tahun.
- FGVH tidak mendapat kelulusan kerajaan negeri untuk mencagarkan tanah tersebut sebagai modal saham. Tanah di bawah Akta Penempatan Berkelompok (GSA) adalah milik kerajaan negeri.
- Suruhanjaya Sekuriti Malaysia disalahguna dalam usaha meneruskan penyenaraian pada Jun 2012. Tanpa persetujuan pemilik tanah suruhanjaya sepatutnya menolak penyenaraian FGVH.

Skandal AES

- Skandal didedahkan pada Oktober 2012
- Melibatkan dakwaan pemberian tender mengoperasikan sistem AES kepada syarikat kroni Beta Tegap Sdn Bhd
- Pemegang saham terbesar syarikat tersebut ialah To’Puan Rozana Redzuan anak bekas Ketua Bahagian Umno parit Sulong, manakala kedua terbesar Andreas Teoh yang didakwa rapat dengan Presiden MCA, Chua Soi Lek - Sementara Ates Sdn Bhd pula didakwa dimiliki oleh kroni Najib, Tan Sri Azman Yahya.

Skandal Musa Aman

- Skandal paling memalukan Musa Aman adalah penangkapan adik angkatnya Micheal Chia di lapangan terbang Hong Kong pada 2008 ketika membawa pulang wang RM40 juta ke Malaysia. 
- Dalam soal siasat ICAC Hong Kong, Chia mengakui wang tersebut milik Musa.
- Wang RM40 juta itu diakui untuk disumbangkan kepada Umno Sabah. Bagaimanapun pemimpin kanan Umno Sabah seperti Lajim Ukin tidak tahu mengenainya.
- Skandal turut melibatkan Menteri Undang-undang Nazri Aziz. Beliau mempertahankan ‘sumbangan politik’ Musa.
- Siri pendedahan seterusnya berjaya mengesan kenderaan mewah yang digunakan Nedim, anak Nazri. Iaitu, jenis Hummer bernombor pendaftaran WNX 9776 didakwa didaftar atas nama Michael Chia (Chia Tein Foh).

Skandal akuan bersumpah

- Deepak menutup tahun penuh skandal BN dengan kejutan dramatik pada November 2012. Beliau mendedahkan mata rantai yang hilang (missing link) dalam skandal pembunuhan Altantuya Shariibuu dan misteri kehilangan penyiasat persendirian Balasubramaniam.
- Deepak mendedahkan hubungannya dengan Rosmah dan pertolongan perniagaan yang diperolehi dari keluarga Najib.
- Keluarga Najib didedah terlibat secara langsung dalam menarik balik akuan bersumpah Bala.
- Menurut Deepak sekiranya akuan tidak ditarik maka seseorang akan mendedahkan siapa memberi arahan membunuh Altantuya
- Deepak mengatur pertemuan antara adik Najib, Nazim dan Bala. Beliau mendakwa Nazim membayar Bala sejumlah wang daripada RM5 juta yang dijanjikan untuk membuat akuan kedua yang menafikan akuan pertama.-keadilandaily

Harakahdaily's top 20 stories for the year 2012

1. Video shows Nazri's son assaulting guard: report
2. Minister's expensive affair with actress alleged in police report
3. Mahathir's daughter: If we're not Egypt, why fear Bersih?
4. Malaysian flights at risk
5. Meet Ambiga-hater Shahrul, the man behind the failed 'Kelantan Fiesta'
6. 'Lembu punya susu, sapi dapat nama'
7. 'Damn it, please move out!' - Rafidah tells Shahrizat
8. Chinese New Year clip draws the hits
9. Man City's Muslim star declines champagne bottle
10. Meet the top 10 Muslim footballers
11. Now, not everyone can fly
12. Of Nedim, gold-plated 'bubur ayam' and fine wines
13. Rosmah, the 'first lady of shopping'
14. Anwar demands apology, RM50m from Utusan
15. Fulham player Senderos embraces Islam
16. The top ten towering 'fatwas'
17. Another thuggery case involving cabinet minister
18. Malaysia to go bankrupt in 2019?
19. Anwar's explanation and the stand that Hamas never took
20. Jati's logo inspired by the 'devil'?

source:harakahdaily

cheers.