Isu Tan Sri Khalid ialah satu kes yang mudah- iaitu kes Khalid Ibrahim tidak akur kepada cakap boss dan tidak akur kepada keputusan parti. Boss ialah Anwar Ibrahim dan parti ialah PKR- bukan oang lain dan bukan parti selain PKR.
Perkara ini kenalah difahami oleh bos dan parti lain. Itu sahaja. Nak sibuk kaitkan parti PAS, sibuk dengan hujjah2 lain – undang2 lah, perlembagaan negeri lah. It’s a simple case of Khalid Ibrahim tidak tunduk kepada cakap boss dan tidak akur kepada parti.
Maka jalan penyelesaian nya ialah- singkir dan pecat Khalid. Atau jika Khalid merasakan teraniaya sangat- keluar PKR. Jika mana mana berlaku, kita tidak fikir berkurangan kepada Khalid. (we think not less of Khalid Ibahim).
Kita hormat keputusan yang diambil. Tidak timbul dia khianat, atau belot atau apa. PKR tidak miskin dengan pengeluaran Khalid, dan Khalid pun tidak kaya dengan keluar dari PKR. Ianya akan menyelamatkan kedua dua dari mendapat aib dan malu yang lebih besar.
Hanya soalan nya ialah Anwar Ibrahim , boss PKR sudah kah berbuat demikian? Yakni beri Khalid Ibrahim the marching orders? Jika belum, tidak guna kita berhujjah disini, bertekak dan bertegang leher. Tunjukkan kepimpinan.
Jika sudah, Khalid jangan fikir jawatan MB milik peribadi dia- atau dikalangan orang Pahang, mereka akan kata- jangan fikir jawatan ini bapaok awok punye.
Jika Khalid tidak mahu beri PKR kepuasan memecatnya, dia keluar parti terlebih dahulu. Dia sudah pun berkelahi secara terbuka dengan pimpinan parti- mencemuh keputusan parti. Yang dia belum lakukan ialah secara terbuka mencemuh dan membantai Anwar Ibrahim.
Bab itu dia tidak perlu lakukan sebab kerja kotor tersebut sudah pun dilakukan oleh UMNO, media dan akhbar milik UMNO. Dan oleh golongan yang mesra UMNO.
Ini bukan kes tidak menghargai khidmat Khalid. Atau sebab tidak faham undang2, proses perlantikan MB atau lain2. Bukan sebab undang2 seperti yang hendak dihujjahkan oleh Faekah. Ia nya terbit sebab- daripada Faekah, penyokong Khalid Ibrahim dan membawa kepada Khalid Ibrahim sendiri - semua mereka ingat bahawa jawatan MB ialah jawatan yang dipilih secara lansung oleh pengundi.
Ini perkara asas yang tidak dihahami dan enggan difahami.Campur pula dengan kesemulajadian karakter Khalid Ibrahim. Dia ingat dia seorang sahaja yang betul dalam dunia ini.
Fakta ini juga mesti difahami oleh PAS. Mengapa mahu ambil risiko berpecah hanya kerana mempertahankan Khalid Ibrahim? Itulah sebab nya saya menyebut perlakuan Khalid sebagai pelacur politik yang menjaja kesana sini cerita hiba dan pilu nya dianiayai dan dizalimi oleh parti dan bossnya.
Saya tidak kata Khalid seorang pelacur – itu olahan media mesra UMNO. Saya kata pelacur-politik – suatu term of art. Hendak buat macam mana- sememangnya cara saya tulis ialah intense.
Beberapa minggu yang lalu saya menulis sebuah artikel mengenai isiu ini dan merupakan antara orang yang awal mengatakan, satu kemungkinan ialah mencadangkan ADUN Ijok, Dr Idris untuk jadi MB.
Sama ada dia jadi MB atau tidak, itu suatu ketentuan yang akan kita lihat; tapi yang menarik ialah kenyataan nya terbaru ini. Yakni dia akan akur apa ketua dan parti kata.
Ertinya- dia orang parti dan kenyataan tersebut mengesahkan apa sebenarnya masaalah Khalid Ibrahim. Khalid tidak ikut cakap bos( bos senentiasa betul) dan Khalid tidak ikut keputusan parti. It’s a simple case of babir dan degil.- Mohd.Ariff Sabri bin Hj. Abdul Aziz@sakmongkol ak47
PAS is passe but divorcing PKR and DAP is hard to do...
"There clearly is a split" was how political analyst Wan Saiful Wan Jan summed up the tenuous situation in PAS.
He acidly added that "PAS members need to make up their mind on whether they want to be a mainstream party that could improve Malaysia's governance, or whether they just want to go to heaven."
A netizen responded to the rhetorical statement this way: "PAS cannot go to heaven AND go mainstream?"
Wan Saiful was referring to the split right down the middle of PAS over the Selangor menteri besar's post that laid bare the soul of the Islamic party.
The fight over PKR's move to replace menteri besar Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim with PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail provided the catalyst.
The PAS schism is between the conservatives who want a return to the party's struggle for an Islamic state, and the progressives who wish to work within Pakatan Rakyat on its common policy framework which omits mention of hudud, the Islamic penal code.
While the conservatives refuse to compromise on their insistence of an Islamic state, the progressives know that Putrajaya is within reach only by working within Pakatan.
Led by deputy president Mohamad Sabu, the progressives are fully aware that Malaysians as a whole are not ready for hudud that the conservatives are bent on pushing.
For the conservatives, the struggle is more important than winning on the premise that "real victory is in the afterlife."
According to a recent survey by the Merdeka Centre, nearly three in five Malaysians believed the country is not ready for hudud.
A total of 59% of those polled shared the belief, with 58% of Malays agreeing. The percentage among Chinese was 59%, and among Indians 61%.
Just 25% of all respondents, and 30% of Malays, believed that Malaysia is ready for hudud.
The political arithmetic in the Selangor state assembly muddles the debate within PAS and between the Islamic party and PKR/DAP.
Pakatan has 44 seats while Umno holds the remaining 12 in the 56-seat legislature. Within Pakatan, PAS and DAP have 15 seats each, while PKR has 14.
Muddling the mess is PAS' ambition to fill the menteri besar's post.
They point out that PAS has one seat more than PKR, conveniently forgetting that PAS' treachery in the last general election had cost PKR the Kota Damansara constituency.
Mohamad preemptively scuttled the idea when he said recently that PAS should not helm the state as it would lead to a Pakatan loss in the next state elections.
However, elements among the PAS conservatives harbour lingering ambitions to cooperate with Umno, beginning with Selangor.
They are mindful that if PAS teams up with Umno, they will have 27 seats.
They will then need just two defections from PKR/DAP to command a simple majority of 29 out of 56 seats, thereby grabbing the menteri besar's post from PKR.
But PAS research director Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad called on his party to convene a central committee meeting immediately to settle all problems definitively.
"Please my friends, wake up from the preoccupation and ruthless cyclical trap. Enough is enough of destroying Pakatan Rakyat," he said.
"It would be a tragedy if Pakatan Rakyat ends here," the party progressive added.
So what was PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang up to when he went against his own party's and Pakatan's presidential council decision to replace Khalid?
Mohamad was quick to retort that it was merely Hadi's "personal view."
But Hadi was supported by PAS spiritual leader Datuk Seri Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat.
Hadi is known to favour cooperating with Umno, while Nik Aziz is vehemently opposed to any cooperation with the ruling party, so the spiritual leader's support further confuses matters.
PAS Youth chief Suhaizan Kaiat was the first senior leader to confess that his party is in crisis.
Hadi's move to back Khalid had come as a surprise as PAS was represented at the Pakatan presidential council meeting by six senior leaders who carried the party's mandate to agree on replacing the menteri besar.
The six were Mohamad, vice-presidents Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man and Datuk Husam Musa, secretary-general Datuk Mustafa Ali, central committee member Dr Hatta Ramli and Suhaizan, most of whom are seen as progressives.
Unless PAS resolves this conflict internally and with PKR and DAP, it will revert to "a regional party confined to the east coast of the peninsula" in the words of its deputy president.
"Without Pakatan, our area of dominance would only stretch from Rantau Panjang (in northern Kelantan) to Kemaman (southern Terengganu)," Mohamad said at PAS' last muktamar (assembly.
Is being passe what PAS really wants? - Tan Jooi Long,theantdaily
cheers.
No comments:
Post a Comment