Saya juga menyebut banyak contoh lain di mana isteri atau anak pemimpin negara seperti Evita Peron, Khalida Zia, Benazir Bhutto, Corazon Aquino, Megawati Sukarno Putri dan ramai lagi berganding bahu atau mengambil alih panji-panji suami atau bapa mereka sebagai pemimpin negara.
Memandangkan pilihan raya umum akan diadakan tidak lama lagi, mungkin baik kalau kita timbangkan semula kemungkinan Rosmah “memformalisekan” kedudukannya sebagai seorang yang berpengaruh dalam pentadbiran negara dengan bertanding pilihan raya.
Apa salahnya beliau bertanding sebagai salah seorang calon “winnable” Barisan Nasional dalam PRU nanti kerana politik dinasti dan keluarga bukan asing bagi Malaysia. Wan Azizah bertukar kerusi dengan Anwar dan anak mereka, Nurul Izzah, juga Ahli Parlimen. Betty Chew, isteri Lim Guan Eng, Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang, adalah Adun DAP bagi kerusi Kota Laksamana, Melaka.
Lagipun, cakap-cakap rasmi, separuh rasmi dan kedai kopi memberikan kredit yang tinggi kepada Rosmah bukan sahaja kerana kepintaran dan pendidikan beliau yang tinggi, tetapi juga kerana kreativiti, ketegasan dan keberanian.
Kalau tidak pintar masakan beliau diterima masuk ke sekolah elit Tunku Kursiah, mendapat ijazah sarjana muda Sosiologi dan Antropologi dari Universiti Malaya dan sarjana Sosiologi dan Pertanian dari Louisiana State University, Amerika Syarikat.
Pengalaman kerja beliau juga luas — pernah menjadi eksekutif di Bank Pertanian (sekarang Bank Agro) dan sebagai pengurus pembangunan perniagaan syarikat hartanah Island and Peninsular Bhd.
Mungkin beliau boleh mengepalai senarai calon “winnable” Barisan Nasional yang Mohd Najib uar-uarkan itu. Kalau tidak di Negeri Sembilan, negeri kelahirannya, Rosmah boleh bertanding di kerusi selamat Putrajaya bagi menggantikan Teuku (Tengku Aceh) Adnan Mansor.
Apabila beliau dipilih sebagai wakil rakyat, maka adillah dan patutlah bagi sesiapa pun untuk memuji dan menyanjung atau mengkritik dan mengutuk beliau. Dan layaklah beliau menerima peruntukan rasmi untuk projek-projek beliau. Wallahualam. — kadirjasin.blogspot.com
(Petikan di atas adalah sebahagian daripada rencana yang aku cedok daripada blog 'The Scribe A Kadir Jasin' untuk kita renung bersama akan serba kemungkinannya berlaku dalam dunia politik Malaysia yang lintang pukang dan penuh dengan penipuan,angkara perbuatan SPR yang sering menjilat buntut UMNO)
Baca rencan penuhnya di sini.
Memanglah di Putrajaya,Rosmah tak payah pergi kempen pun. Letak saja gambar2 cincin Rosmah disekitar precint, dah sure menang besar!
Apakah Tengku(celup) Adnan Mansor bakal menanggis tak berlagu....
Sekadar bertanding di Putrajaya tak payahlah heboh seantero dunia yang dia tu calon "winnable".
Umno's dilemma in picking 'winnable' candidates...
A winnable candidate must be someone who is acceptable to the majority of voters in a constituency and also by the party machinery as well, said Prime Minister Najib Razak.
Najib explained that if the party machinery rejects someone who has the ability or track record, that person will not succeed and in the end the party will lose both the seat and power.
"If we as party members are not open minded and insist that a person must be a candidate based on party hierarchy even though our candidate might not win, then what'll happen is that our candidate will fail," he said to Bernama during an exclusive interview in conjunction with the upcoming 2011 Umno General Assembly, here today.
The Umno president emphasised the importance of everyone in the party to understand what was meant by 'winnable candidate', which would be highlighted during the elections.
"Otherwise it'll be tough to succeed. If the winnable candidate is put forth by a group within a certain division without considering the wishes of the majority of voters, that candidate would also not succeed," said Najib.
Difficult to please everyone
He admitted that it was difficult to please everyone, especially at the Umno divisional level, but said "the winnable candidate formula was to give each contested seat the best chance to win."
However, he said the selection of candidates was not finalised yet and the evaluation would be made objectively and not just subjectively.
"This is most important. The candidate we select should not be someone we like personally but someone who can be accepted by a majority of voters in the said area. That's what we must do," he elaborated.
He said the question of deciding on a candidate was very challenging and difficult and it was impossible for the party to please everyone.
"In my 35 years of experience in politics, it has never happened in an election," he added.
"But whatever decisions the party makes, ultimately we have to accept the party's decision as a party member, even if it's not to our liking," he said.
If the party loses, it means we'll lose power
He described his many experiences where people loyal to the party accepted the party's decisions even though they did not like it, which finally led to the candidate winning.
"On the other hand if they continue to object and say whatever happens, I want to contest. That means they're not loyal to the party and the candidate loses, which means the party loses. They should realise that when the party loses it means we'll lose power," he asserted.
Najib also admitted that even at the divisional level party members did not see eye-to-eye on the best candidate and said that what they needed was party discipline.
"Meaning, when it's time to make the decision on candidate selection, it should be accepted, supported and defended by each member of the party," he said.
It was vital to consider the criteria for candidate selection following the 2008 general election which saw BN and Umno losing five states and it was a lesson that should never be forgotten, said Najib. - Bernama
cheers.
1 comment:
Kalau mereka turun ke Lembah Pantai,mereka terkencing.
Kalau mereka turun ke Seputeh, mereka terberak tahi putih!!!!
Post a Comment