tumpang sekole...?: SPR terlibat dalam kempen bantahan terancang?...

SPR bersekongkol kempen

bantahan terancang nafi hak mengundi?

Pejabat Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) di sini hari ini kecoh ekoran tindakan pegawai SPR membenarkan sesi pendengaran awam melibatkan nama pengundi yang dibantah (orang kena bantah) dijalankan tanpa kehadiran pihak pembantah.

Kekecohan berlaku selepas Ahli Parlimen Serdang, Dr Ong Kian Ming yang hadir memantau sesi pendengaran awam itu mempersoalkan tindakan SPR berkenaan yang menurutnya tidak mematuhi Peraturan 17, Peraturan-Peraturan Pilihan Raya (Pendaftaran Pemilih).

Menurut Kian Ming, sesi pendengaran awam tidak boleh dijalankan jika pihak pembantah – yang dipercayai didalangi UMNO – tidak dipanggil bersama-sama orang kena bantah (OKB) ke dalam bilik siasatan SPR.

Ahli Parlimen Serdang,Dr Ong Kian Ming

mempersoalkan tindakan pegawai SPR

Pegawai itu bagaimanapun menyatakan bahawa dia tidak tahu Bahasa Inggeris apabila ditunjukkan Peraturan-Peraturan Pilihan Raya (Pendaftaran Pemilih) yang dicetak Kian Ming daripada laman web rasmi SPR.

“Salinan peraturan yang saya cetak itu daripada laman rasmi SPR, dalam bahasa Inggeris, kerana itu sahaja yang ada di laman web tersebut, jadi saya gunakan peraturan tersebut, bagaimanapun dia (pegawai SPR) kata dia tak faham bahasa Inggeris,” katanya.

Usaha Penolong Setiausaha DAP Selangor itu untuk menjadi saksi kepada setiap OKB yang dipanggil ke bilik siasatan turut dihalang pegawai bertugas.

Bantahan itu melibatkan nama pengundi yang dipamerkan SPR dalam Rang Daftar Pemilih Tambahan (RDPT) suku keempat 2016.

Sementara itu, seorang OKB yang dikenali sebagai Tan Wei Hong, 21, dari Tanjong Karang menyifatkan sesi pendengaran itu sebagai tidak adil kerana pihak yang membantah tidak turut serta dalam sesi berkenaan.

“Pihak pembantah iaitu Mohd Yusop Omar tidak hadir dalam sesi pendengaran hari ini. Ia sangat tidak adil dan melanggar peraturan,” kata Wei Hong yang juga penuntut di Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR).

Tan Wei Hong,21

Bantahan tanpa asas

Bapa kepada Wei Hong yang hanya mahu dikenali sebagai Tan berkata, beliau tidak berpuas hati dengan tindakan pihak pembantah yang menurutnya membuat bantahan tanpa mempunyai asas yang kukuh.

“Saya sebenarnya berkerja hari ini, dan anak saya sedang belajar, perkara-perkara begini amat menyusahkan,” katanya.

Mengikut Peraturan 18, Peraturan-Peraturan Pilihan Raya (Pendaftaran Pemilih), pihak pembantah diarahkan membayar pampasan tidak lebih RM200 kepada OKB jika pihak SPR mendapati bantahan itu dibuat tanpa sebab yang kukuh.

Rata-rata OKB yang ditemui pemberita menerima RM100 sebagai pampasan ganti rugi masa dan kesulitan yang dihadapi mereka.

Menurut Kian Ming, sebarang bantahan sepatutnya dilakukan dengan siasatan terperinci dan bukannya secara semberono kerana ia akan menyusahkan OKB untuk hadir ke sesi pendengaran tersebut.

Beliau turut menganggarkan kurang 50 peratus OKB hadir ke sesi pendengaran berkenaan.

“Secara anggaran, terdapat enam kerusi Parlimen yang terlibat dengan bantahan ini, dengan anggaran 100 orang bagi setiap kerusi Parlimen, mungkin dalam 600 orang dibantah, namun saya rasa hanya separuh daripada mereka hadir,” ujarnya.

Antara kawasan yang terlibat dengan bantahan ini adalah; Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN) Sungai Burong (Parlimen Tanjung Karang); DUN Sri Serdang (Puchong); DUN Batang Kali (Hulu Selangor); Parlimen Selayang; dan DUN Dusun Tua (Hulu Langat) dan Parlimen Kuala Selangor.

“Semua kawasan ini adalah kawasan yang ditandingi UMNO-Barisan Nasional (dalam pilihan raya umum yang lalu),” ujarnya.

Selain Kian Ming, turut hadir memantau sesi pendengaran awam tersebut ialah Adun Kuala Kubu Baru, Lee Kee Hiong. – Roketkini.com

Gurindam Seloka Tuduhan

Derma RM90 Juta...

Rafizi kata, Najib bagi derma. Kepada PAS parti ulama.

Jumlahnya besar tidak terhingga. Bukan RM2 juta macam Mat Maslan terima. Atau RM1 juta kepada Shahrir orang lama. Tapi RM90 juta jumlahnya.

Rafizi kata dia tak auta. Sebagai bukti, SD dia buat sama. Kalau berani samanlah dia.

Maka kecut perutlah PAS. Terpaksa hempas pulas. Cari alasan buat ancaman. Supaya ahli dan penyokong tak sangka yang bukan-bukan.

Rafizi kata, Ustaz Nashrudin Mat Isa adalah perantara. Duit “curi” SRC International dialah yang terima. Dulu dia orang kuat PAS. Tapi tahun 2011 lawan Mohamad Sabu dia tewas.

Nashrudin kata, dia tak terima. Ini semua Rafizi punya angkara.

Tuan Ibrahim kata, dia tak tahu apa-apa. Satu sen pun PAS tak terima. Dia kata Ustaz Nashrudin Mat Isa tak sumbang sebarang derma.

Kalau Rafizi dusta, buatlah sumpah SD macam dia.

Tapi kalau duit RM90 juta itu Najib betul-betul bagi, habis ke mana ia pergi? Najib pun tak nafi. Baca seterusnya...

Nik Amar confused on 'Sodomy II SD'...

PAS vice-president Nik Amar Nik Abdullah appears to have a foggy memory over the statutory declarations (SD) related to the Sodomy II trial, says PKR vice-president Rafizi Ramli.

Nik Amar had said recently that Rafizi's SD alleging that SRC International Sdn Bhd funds were channelled to former PAS deputy president Nasrudin Mat Isa could not be taken seriously.

If Rafizi's SD was accepted, Nik Amar said, then the public must accept the SDs of Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan and former Bank Negara assistant governor Abdul Murad Khalid's as well.

To this, Rafizi clarified that Saiful's role in Sodomy II did not involve him making an SD, but his complaint was made in a police report.

"It was not through a SD because the penalty for making a false SD is severe," Rafizi said in a statement today.

Why doctor's SD is true

He said the famous SD related to Sodomy II was the one made by Dr Mohamad Osman Abdul Hamid of Hospital Pusrawi, who examined Saiful.

Mohamad Osman's medical report concluded that the "anus was normal, no bleeding, there were no signs of piles and no abscess and no pus, no injury, no tear and no discharge. Anus was clean and dry and looked normal. No abnormalities seen."

The statutory declaration recounted Mohamad Osman's experience with examining Saiful and the police investigations that followed.

According to Rafizi, Mohamad Osman's medical report and SD were crucial evidence that were ignored by the courts in convicting Anwar Ibrahim for sodomising Saiful.

"The police never took action against Mohamad Osman either, which showed that his SD is true," Rafizi added. - mk

MP Pandan kata Mohd Amar keliru isu SD

Kim Quek - Dr Osman Hamid’s medical examination of Saiful, which preceded the latter’s examination by government doctors, stands unchallenged today; and would have Saiful’s allegation of forced sodomy dismissed without allowing the case to go to court in any democratic country.

It is to Dr Osman’s credit that he stood by his medical report despite harassment and threat by the police. The government conspiracy to fix Anwar with the sodomy charge at this stage of his Sodomy II tribulations were elaborated in my book “the march to Putrajaya” under Article 34 “Medical report exonerates Anwar, but police doggedly pursue him” and Article 35 “Sodomy never took place”.

In Article 35, the dates of the alleged sodomy and the subsequent medical examinations were inadvertently written as July 2008, instead of June 2007.

PAS now sounds exactly like UMNO

Roti Chanai and 3rd World Low IQ...

Here is some chatter in the 'Indian Muslim Business Forum'? about Ku Nan's advice to mamak restaurants to not charge too much for teh tarik and roti chanai.

Ku Nan is too stupid for me to comment about him today. But a few days back a former president of a Malay Chamber of Commerce was telling me that Malay restaurants are disappearing - all over Malaysia, especially in Kuala Lumpur.

"Restoran Melayu di KL tutup, satu satu depa tutup" (one by one they are closing down).

There is a simple reason for this. After GST fewer Malays can spend enough in Malay restaurants to sustain their viability. So restoran Melayu semua tutup.

So where do working class Malays eat breakfast and lunch ?

1. At the tepi jalan warongs (which are sited at the tepi jalan or over the longkangs and over the parit)
2. Indian Muslim restaurant (kedai mamak) and
3. Indian restaurants.

Ever since the GST, the mamak restaurants and Indian restaurants have become the main source of food supply for Malay workers, Malay urban office people and ordinary Malays especially in KL and the Klang Valley.

Please do not mess with this source of food supply. If the mamak restaurants and Indian restaurants close down (like the other Malay owned restaurants) then were are the vast majority of urban Malay workers in KL and the Klang Valley going to get their breakfast and lunch?

Not everyone will eat at a warong. The choice is limited and it is "kurang selesa" - eating over a longkang !

There is an increasing number of Malays eating at Indian owned (non Muslim) restaurants. Not all of these Indian restaurants have halal stickers but so what? They do not serve non halal meat AND beef. Plus they buy their chicken, kambing etc from halal suppliers in the markets. - ostb