2. Bank Negara Malaysia harus menjelaskan "kehilangan tautan"(missing link) ini.
3. Adakah kesalahan teknikal atau manipulasi yang disengajakan?
4. Kredibiliti Bank Negara dipersoalkan.
Bila Menteri kata moratorium pembayaran bank itu sebagai 'penjimatan', maka rakyat diberi gambaran bahawa 6 bulan itu tidak perlu dibayar balik.
5. Menteri Kewangan Zafrul ini Menteri Bank atau Menteri Kewangan? Dia kenalah tau tentang cara mana bank boleh menjana wang bukan menjana dengan memaksakan faedah bank ke atas peminjam.
6. Oleh itu, netizen berhak tanya untuk siapa Menteri ini berkhidmat? - bank atau rakyat.
7. Setelah memberansangkan Mak Cik Kiah dengan pakej rangsangan yang unik, mungkinkah pemerintah tebuk atap melakukan perkara yang sama dengan peminjam? - f/bk
Sebelum ni depa cuba kambing hitamkan KSU Kementerian KPDNK isu permit kilang arak Henieken.. lepas tu salahkan KSN dalam isu jemputan Mesyuarat COVID-19.. kali ni Bank Negara..sedangkan dasar itu datang dari Kerajaan,Kementerian kewangan..
Dalam temubual Awani Menteri Kayangan Tg Zafrul dan Azmin Ali sendiri jelas , mereka sendiri menyebutkan kompaun keatas faedah, dan faedah itu dikecualikan,.. ada bukti video kenyataan mereka..Sekarang ni salah komunikasi dari Bank Negara atau dari Menteri Kewangan dan Menteri ekonomi(MITI) tebuk atap ?
Jangan lupa, sebelum ini pernah didedahkan..bagaimana Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) sebelum PH yang dituduh membeli tanah seluas 55.79 ekar pada nilai RM 2 bilion dari kerajaan ..bayangkan Bank Negara beli tanah yang takda sebarang keperluan dari Kerajaan pada harga yang tinggi..masa tu orang kaitkan dengan 1MDB..
Agaknya dalam keadaan ekonomi yang tenat ni..depa perlukan Gabenor Bank Negara yang baru kot.. - Ipohmali
Kena tipu...
1. Keputusan menukar syarat moratorium akan menyusahkan rakyat. Tujuan moratorium diberi adalah untuk membantu rakyat. Tetapi, jika rakyat kena bayar 6 bulan pinjaman secara lump sum untuk elak bayar faedah, ini beban kepada semua!
2. Jika pengguna tidak mahu membayar 6 bulan pinjaman secara lump sum, mereka akan menanggung hutang kadar faedah sepanjang tempoh moratorium ini. Ini bukan seperti yang diputuskan pada 25 Mac yang lalu. Seharusnya, moratorium penuh diberi kepada semua tanpa kenakan sebarang cas.
3. Jika kerajaan memilih untuk menutup mata dalam hal ini, saya kira ia sangat membebankan rakyat. Sudahlah ramai yang hilang kerja, mereka perlu pikul hutang 6 bulan untuk dibayar sekaligus untuk mengelak dari cas faedah. Jangan hanya bantu institusi bank, bantu juga rakyat!
Tengku Zafrul kata “Makcik Kiah will save on interest sebab many banks have made announcement that interest will not be accrued.” Zafrul... kamu jgn nak spin kenyataan... kau ingat rakyat bodoh? Ini bukti apa yg kamu cakap . Cmni cara menteri tipu rakyat? Kamu ingat rakyat bodoh? Kan dah kena maki...f/bk
4. Bantuan Prihatin Nasional memberi gambaran Mak Cik Kiah tidak perlu membayar pinjaman penuh selama 6 bulan. Namun kini realitinya, dia perlu membayar pinjaman bulan April, Mei dan Jun sebelum 30 Jun untuk elak dikenakan faedah. Malah, ditambah lagi dengan permohonan BPN yang masih belum lulus-lulus.
5. Terlalu ramai yang memikul beban sepanjang wabak pandemik ini. Jika syarat moratorium diubah esok, Mak Cik Kiah dan keluarga akan bertambah susah. Gerai tidak boleh dibuka, tetapi pinjaman masih harus dibayar penuh. Harap kerajaan yang prihatin akan dapat melihat beban orang kebanyakan ini. - Syed Saddiq Syed Abdul Rahman
Negara rugi? mustahil...
Mana ada rugi, bukankah dah dapat yg dicita2kan setelah plan berbulan2 utk bentuk kerajaan pintu belakang?
Bukankah sejak kamu perintah, kamu dapat duit banyak dan kamu belanjakan duit itu macam 'santa clause" sehinggakan ada wakil2 rakyat pun dapat bantuan BPN? Duit yg kamu belanjakan sehingga lebih RM 260 Bilion itu semua kamu perolehi sendiri sebab kerajaan PH dahulu mana ada tinggalkan duit kan?
Takkan rugi, mana boleh rugi sebuah kerajaan melayu bergabung dengan pak2 lebai tanpa Dap boleh rugi? Mustahil. Takkan Pak2 lebai tu tak buat solat hajat atau berdoa agar kerajaan tak rugi?
Mustahil kerajaan rugi setiap hari. Kalau rugi, takkan lantik menteri sampai 70 orang, tidak termasuk duta2 khas bertaraf menteri dan para2 penasihat 20 persen? Macam sebuah syarikat, kalau syarikat itu rugi setiap hari, adakah dia akan menambahkan para pekerja di syarikatnya? Kecuali kalau pengurus syarikat itu otak dia sembab dan bodoh.
Kalau sehari kerajaan rugi RM 2.4 Bilion, bayangkan sekarang sudah berapa hari? Berbaloikah tebuk atap untuk jadi PM seperti jadi mahu jadi tokey ikan yang setiap hari rugi? Bukankah itu satu kerja bodoh?
Apa pun bersyukurlah, para2 elit sudah boleh main golf, berjogging dan berbasikal. Taikun2 besar boleh mulakan bisnes. Mak Cik Kiah tidak perlu jual goreng pisang lagi sebab Mak Cik Kiah sudah jadi kaya kerana pendapatannya di saat kerajaan rugi adalah sebanyak RM 4 ribu hingga RM 8 ribu sebulan.
Persidangan Parlimen? Satu hari je cukup untuk dengar ucapan perasmian dari Agong. Alaaahh...lagi pun bersidang di Parlimen tidak penting bagi kami kerana kami naik jadi kerajaan pun bukan melalui proses demokrasi yang sah di Parlimen dengan mandat rakyat pun. Apa khabar tok peti yang sokong pengkhianat? - Wfauzdin Ns
Anwar should be opposition
leader in Parliament...
Anwar Ibrahim has the prime minister’s post snatched away from him right under his nose in February. That was the unkindest cut, particularly when the move came about from betrayals by the PKR president’s own party members and coalition partners.
Even the worst Anwar detractor would be able to see the great injustice done not only to Anwar personally but also to the majority of Malaysians who swept Pakatan Harapan to power in May 2018.
The backdoor Perikatan Nasional (PN) government is still considered “illegal” in the eyes of many, no matter how one views it, and no matter how it has been “constitutionally” mandated according to the laws of the land.
Many are just counting the days for this precarious and “illegal” PN coalition to fall. That couldn’t be further from the truth.
Meantime, Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin has his hands full today. In Muhyiddin’s own words: “I took office besieged with challenging political, economic problems and the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic.” I doubt anyone will envy the prime minister’s job today.
In all fairness to Muyhiddin, he has handled the pandemic crisis quite well - probably with an able helping hand in the person of the dynamic Health Ministry director-general Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah.
I will not be a critic of the prime minister on the pandemic front although there were many teething problems involving the movement control order (MCO) and the shortage of personal protective equipment (PPEs) for our doctors, nurses and other frontliners. I consider those oversights forgivable.
What is unnerving is the prime minister’s actions on the political front, rewarding members of parliament with plum jobs in government-linked companies (GLCs) and making other political appointments.
While many Malaysians have lost their jobs, here we have a prime minister moving to appease his political allies by giving them a “second salary”. Muhyiddin must be told that Malaysians find such appointments out of place at this desperate time and totally unacceptable.
I would want to see such issues debated in Parliament and certainly the RM261 billion stimulus package which was announced by the prime minister earlier in three stages.
Hence, I support the move by the Pakatan Harapan presidential council in calling for a full sitting of Parliament starting May 18 to deal with matters related to the economy and the rakyat’s welfare in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The May 18 sitting has been slated only for a day by the speaker. I also agree that the standard operating procedures (SOPs) which were set by Parliament earlier can facilitate the sitting for at least two weeks. This is seeing as economic sectors are being allowed to operate again in the fourth phase of the MCO, starting April 29.
Another issue yet to be decided is the appointment of the opposition leader in Parliament. There is no doubt that Anwar should be the opposition leader. By convention, the position is held by the leader of the political party not in government that has the most seats in the House.
With DAP, Amanah and his own PKR lawmakers solidly behind him, Anwar could easily lay claim to being the leader with the most seats on the opposing side. The role is also not new to Anwar as he has been the opposition leader in the past.
I do not expect any other candidate to be elected the opposition leader when the election for the post is held according to the rules of Parliament. And no, not even Dr Mahathir Mohamad, with the utmost respect to him.
I would also expect DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng to be given the seat next to opposition leader Anwar on the left-hand side of the centre table, opposite the prime minister. The seat next to Lim should rightly be for Amanah president Mohamad Sabu.
That’s the little respect in the august House that the speaker or the minister in charge of Parliament should accord the honourable senior leaders of the opposition parties. It’s the dignity within the halls of Parliament that is rightfully theirs, and they deserve to be accorded such respect.
As opposition leader, Anwar is also entitled to the facilities of the office of the opposition leader in Parliament. I do not doubt that the office will be meaningfully utilised in the weeks and months, if not years, ahead by Anwar.
I am somewhat saddened that Mahathir did not propose Anwar to be the new opposition leader, even after the Langkawi MP had said that he would sit with the opposition in Parliament.
I will not speculate as to why Mahathir was not magnanimous enough to do so. Whatever, Anwar should be the opposition leader in Parliament come May 18. Surely, no one will snatch that post away from him too. - Francis Pau Siah.mk
cheers.
No comments:
Post a Comment