15 July 2015

Kami dilayan seperti binatang,kata mangsa belasah rusuhan Low Yat...

Kereta Proton Wira dinaiki 3 sekawan yang dibelasah dalam rusuhan di depan Plaza Low Yat, Kuala Lumpur, Ahad lalu, remuk teruk. – Gambar The Malaysian Insider oleh Kamal Ariffin, 15 Julai, 2015.

Tiga sekawan yang dibelasah dalam kereta Proton Wira berhampiran Plaza Low Yat pada malam Isnin baru-baru ini mendakwa mereka diperlakukan seperti binatang tanpa dapat peluang untuk mempertahankan diri.

Pengalaman diheret keluar daripada kereta dan dibelasah adalah pengalaman hitam yang sukar dilupakan Patrick Lim, 21, salah seorang daripada mangsa dalam video kereta yang remuk semasa rusuhan tersebut.

"Kami diperlakukan seperti binatang," kata Lim pada sidang media di sebuah bengkel kereta di Gombak, Selangor.

Lim bersama dua lagi rakan sebayanya, Ah Peng dan Vincent ketika itu dalam perjalanan pulang selepas makan malam sebelum mereka dihentikan sekumpulan pemuda Melayu.

Kereta Lim rosak teruk, semua cermin keretanya pecah dan remuk bahagian depan hingga ke belakang bonet.

Rakannya, Vincent ketika ini masih lagi dirawat di Hospital Tawakal di Kuala Lumpur akibat kecederaan serius yang dialaminya, sementara beliau dan Ah Peng baru keluar hospital semalam.

"Kami mula-mula dihantar ke HKL (Hospital Kuala Lumpur), tetapi rakan saya (Vincent) cedera parah di bahagian perut dan perlu dibedah.

"Ibu bapanya mahu beliau dihantar ke Tawakal untuk dibedah," kata Lim.

Lim berkata, mereka tidak mengetahui tentang rusuhan di Plaza Low Yat dan tersekat di Jalan Imbi akibat jalan dihalang perusuh yang kebanyakannya pemuda Melayu.

"Bila kami tiba di jalan itu yang terletak antara Times Square dan Sungei Wang jalan itu sudah sesak dan kami tidak dapat patah balik.

"Ketika kami melepasi sekumpulan pemuda Melayu, tiba-tiba mereka menjerit 'itu Cina' yang menuding jaring kepada kereta kami," katanya.

Lim menafikan ada mengeluarkan kata provokasi kepada kumpulan Melayu tersebut seperti didakwa dan tidak mengambil sebarang alkohol pada malam itu.

"Cuba fikir secara logik, kalau kamu dikepung oleh orang ramai sebegitu adakah kamu akan mengeluarkan kata-kata melawan mereka?

"Saya tidak bercakap apa-apa, saya cuma menjawab mengatakan saya tinggal di Ampang," katanya. 


 

Satu laporan polis juga dibuat oleh Lim bersama rakannya Ah Peng semalam di balai polis Jalan Bandar (HS Lee) semalam.

Lim memberitahu wang tunai kira-kira RM700 yang disimpan dalam dompetnya juga hilang, telefon bimbit, jam tangan dan aksesori komputer.

"Semua barang peribadi saya hilang selepas dibelasah," kata Lim yang bekerja secara sambilan dalam bidang pemasaran.

Lebih malang lagi, pihak insurans juga tidak akan menanggung kos kerugian keretanya kerana ia diakibatkan rusuhan, kata Lim.

Dalam pada itu, Pengerusi DAP Pahang Tengku Zulpuri Shah Raja Puji yang bertemu dengan Lim di bengkel sama pagi tadi menyifatkan tindakan samseng tersebut sebagai memalukan kaum Melayu.

"Sudah lah mereka pukul, kemudiaan mencuri pula," katanya pada sidang media sama.

Zulpuri, yang juga Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (Adun) Mentakab juga melihat kejadian di Low Yat sebagai percubaan untuk mengalihkan pandangan umum daripada isu besar dihadapi negara seperti 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).

Walaupun insiden tersebut meninggalkan kesan mendalam kepada Lim, beliau tidak menyimpan perasaan dendam malah memberitahu ramai rakannya terdiri daripada orang Melayu.

"Saya tidak berdendam, buat apa saya nak berdendam. Lagipun banyak kawan-kawan saya juga orang Melayu," katanya. – tmi


Beaten bloody, but he does not want revenge...

It was meant to be a quiet drive home for Patrick Lim in the wee hours of Monday morning, after having supper with friends near the Bukit Bintang area.

However, he and two others were instead dragged out of the car he was driving, and a mob that he estimated to number more than 100 descended on them.

A video clip of the attack has gone viral on the social media, showing a group thrashing a black Proton Wira and assaulting several people, while police struggled to disperse the group - until at least one of the policemen pulled out his pistol and pointed it in the air.

Speaking to reporters for the first time since the incident, Lim, 21, said he holds no grudges.

"Many people asked me why don't I want revenge. It is because I have many Malay friends. I don't I want to be a racist.

"We are born in Malaysia, there is no point fighting back. But I hope there will be no more incidents like this again. There is no point. We are Malaysians," he said.

Lim was met at a car workshop in Kuala Lumpur where he had taken the car for repair.

Recounting the incident, the former state basketball player said he felt helpless in the 10 minutes or so when he was being beaten up.

"They treated us like animals," he added, hoping that his assailants would be brought to justice.

Lim was met at a car workshop in Kuala Lumpur where the Wira was taken for repair but was it ultimately decided that the 12-year old vehicle not be fixed.

Lim said police have informed him that 15 people have been arrested so far in realtion to the mob attack but he has yet to be summoned to identify them.

Mob asked questions first


That morning at about 3.30am, he said he was heading home after having supper at a restaurant behind Berjaya Times Square along Jalan Imbi.

With Lim were his friends Max Chu and Vincent Peng - both also 21, while another friend and his girlfriend followed in a second car behind.

He said upon reaching the intersection of Jalan Imbi and Jalan Sultan Ismail, he saw that the road ahead was blocked by the police and so he decided to make a U-turn.

To a question, Lim (photo) said he was aware of rioting at Low Yat Plaza earlier that day but did not think the incident would spread.

After making his U-turn, he said he saw that the left lane of the three-lane road was blocked by the parked vehicles, while a crowd had blocked the middle lane.

He then drove slowly along the right lane because people were criss-crossing the road but noted he and his passenger drew fierce-looking glares as he did so.

He said he then heard shouts of, “Itu Cina! Itu Cina! (A Chinese! A Chinese!) from the crowd immediately after which a man yanked his car door open (which did not have auto-locking) and asked him if he was Chinese.

Lim recounted that before he was able to answer the question, he was asked another: 'Where do you live?'

As soon as he gave the answer to the second question, Lim received a punch to the face and this sparked the mob into its frenzied attack on the car and its hapless occupants.

'Covered in blood'

Peng, who was asleep in the rear passenger seat, was the first to be dragged out of the car while Lim and Chu in the front were kicked and punched in their seats for around six minutes as they were wearing seatbelts. They, too, were dragged out shortly after.

Peng suffered the worst injuries and is still hospitalised. He is in stable condition following an operation for stitches to his forehead and  to remove glass shards from his body.

Lim and Chu suffered mostly bruises and grazes to their head, mouth, arms and legs.

Meanwhile, their friends in the second car had reversed and sped towards the safety of a police roadblock located behind them.

“Me and my other friend (Chu) just kept covering our heads, because at the time we had our seatbelts on and it was very hard for them to pull us out,” recalled a traumatised Lim.

“But all (my personal items), my phone and my wallet got stolen by them. After that, they started breaking my car windows and jumping on my car.

“I still remember there were a few people using hammers, helmets, wheel locks  and pieces of wood to keep on hitting and attacking us,” Lim recounted.

He said it was another three minutes or so after he was dragged out of his car before police intervened and  took him to safety.

He said when he looked back  then, he saw that Peng was still being viciously attacked.

“I saw that his entire face was covered in blood and also his arms. Then I saw someone kick him in the stomach and he went down on the street.

“At the time, maybe he was dizzy and confused, one […] quite huge sized […]  that Malay guy kicked his head, and straightaway he was just laying down on the road.

“Then I saw my friend (Chu) beside the car. One by one, they were attacking him,” he said.

After all three had been removed to a safe area nearby, Peng was rushed to the Kuala Lumpur General Hospital and admittted while Lim and Chu were taken there later for outpatient treatment.

'No one could help me'

Lim stressed that he and his friends did not say anything to the mob apart from answering their questions , nor did they do anything to retaliate.

He said his group were just concentrating on shielding their heads with their arms  from the incoming blows and kicks.

He said this in response to allegations circulating online that the group (lim and his friends) had shouted racist slurs to the mob.

“Got people asking me this type of question so I answered them: If you were in my place, with more than 80 to 100 people (surrounding you), would you dare to shout at them and fight with them and be brave like a superhero?

“In my situation, I was just shocked. Helpless. No one could help me. They just pulled open my door, asked me those two questions, and straightaway punched me in the face,” he said.

Lim said that apart from his smartphone, he lost RM700 cash in the wallet, three ATM cards, a Touch n’ Go card, a SmartTag as well as personal identification documents.

He said when he called his banks in the afternoon to cancel his cards, one of the banks informed him that someone had attempted to use his card at a petrol kiosk, but the transaction due to an incorrect PIN number.

As for Lim's car, its rear spoiler had been broken off, its roof crushed with all windows smashed. The body was littered with numerous dents while the front  doors were heavily damaged.

Lim said the car belongs to his uncle and he does not know the total amount of damage to the car.

Furthermore, he said that his insurance company will not cover the loss as his coverage excludes damage caused by rioting and civil commotion. - mk


lowyat
‘Jangan pukul’, pressman begs as he shields another...

Professional rivalry did not prevent Sin Chew Daily crime reporter Chan Woei Loon from rushing to the aid of China Press photographer Sam Kar Haur who was attacked by a mob near Low Yat Plaza.

Chan said that he was at a tea stall having a cuppa on Sunday and writing a story after a police media conference on the ruckus at Low Yat Plaza, when he heard a lot of aggressive shouts behind him.

A mob of about 30 youths was chasing after Sam and when they caught up with him, began punching and kicking him.

Chan rushed to the aid of Sam, shielding him from the blows, and receiving many himself despite his pleas of “Jangan pukul, sabar, sabar” (Don’t hit, calm down).

The youths, fired up, continued with the assault until several passers-by intervened and took Chan and Sam to safety. Civil Defence Department officers later sent both to the hospital for treatment.

Chan suffered bruises on his forehead, blurry vision and a swollen hand for his troubles.

“It was scary but I couldn’t bear to see a fellow pressman getting beaten up,” Chan said in a report carried by The Star Online yesterday.

He described the group as made up mostly of youth and said, “Sheer stupidity and emotions got the better of them.”

Chan and Sam were among the five people injured in the mob attack that was triggered off by insidious web postings that followed an alleged mobile phone theft in Low Yat Plaza on Saturday.- fmt


Setiausaha Publisiti DAP Tony Pua bercakap kepada media pada sidang akhbar di Kuala lumpur, hari ini. – Gambar The Malaysian Insider oleh Nazir Sufari, 14 Julai, 2015.
1MDB ubah suai penyata kewangan...

DAP percaya syarikat pelaburan milik kerajaan 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) mungkin mengubah suai penyata kewangan mereka berkaitan audit 2014.

Setiausaha Publisiti DAP Tony Pua berkata, ini membabitkan penyata kewangan yang terbaru diaudit untuk Mac 2014 kepada bank, di mana ia berbeza daripada salinan yang diambil daripada Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (SSM).

Pua berkata, pindaan itu berkaitan dana AS$1.22 bilion, di mana perkataan “sudah guna” digantikan kepada “diketepikan”.

Katanya, berdasarkan salinan diperoleh daripada SSM, juruaudit mengesahkan jumah itu ditebus atau lebih kurang sudah digunakan.

“Tetapi dengan menukar 1 perkataan, daripada sudah guna kepada diketepikan, akaun yang diaudit kepada bank akan memberi jaminan palsu kepada peminjam berbanding 1MDB sudah mengetepikan hampir AS$1.11 bilion daripada tunai untuk membayar mereka apabila sampai tempoh faedah dan pinjaman.

“Malah, saya ada alasan kukuh untuk percaya bukan itu saja yang diubahsuai dalam penyata kewangan 2014 1MDB,” katanya pada sidang media di Kuala Lumpur, hari ini.

Pua berkata, dakwaan ubah suai itu “lebih hebat” berbanding tuduhan kepada bekas pengarah PetroSaudi International Xavier Justo yang melakukan perkara sama kepada emel dan beberapa dokumen lain mengenai 1MDB, dikatakan dibawa kepada bekas majikannya.

Bank yang memberi pinjaman kepada 1MDB kini perlu membaca dengan teliti penyata kewangan syarikat berkenaan untuk membongkar semua percanggahan antara dokumen asal dihantar kepada SSM dan salinan yang ada pada bank, kata ahli Parlimen Petaling Jaya Utara itu.

Pua hari ini diberikan salinan audit berkenaan yang diserahkan kepada SSM yang tertera:”Mengikut tarikh laporan ini, jumlah yang diterima daripada penebusan pelaburan AS$1.22 bilion (RM4.03 bilion) dalam SPC di atas sebahagian besarnya sudah digunakan bagi tujuan pembayaran faedah hutang, modal kerja dan bayaran kepada Aabar sebagai deposit dikembalikan...”

Beliau berkata pengubahsuaian penyata kewangan 1MDB adalah kesalahan jenayah serius mengikut Kanun Keseksaan.

Sehubungan itu, Pua menggesa bank membuat laporan polis serta-merta jika percanggahan didapati dalam penyata kewangan itu.

“Jika 1MDB sekarang berani ubah suai penyata kewangan itu, saya sangat bimbang integriti pelbagai dokumen yang dihantar kepada ketua audit negara, termasuk minit mesyuarat lembaga pengarah, resolusi pengarah dan dokumen berkaitan yang lain.

“Saya sangat risau jika mereka turut membuat ubah suai untuk menyembunyikan salah laku syarikat itu, pengarahnya dan pegawai,” katanya.

Ketika ditanya beliau ada bukti penyataan kewangan untuk Mac 2014 yang diberikan kepada bank sudah diubahsuai, Pua berkata:”Saya membuat tuduhan ini. Sudah tentu mengarut untuk saya buat tuduhan ini yang dengan mudah boleh disangkal.”

Pua berkata 1MDB boleh dengan mudah menolak tuduhan itu.

Katanya, ironi apabila 1MDB mendakwa maklumat bocor mengenai urus niaganya diubahsuai sebelum didedahkan laman web Sarawak Report, sedangkan syarikat itu sendiri melakukan “kesalahan sama tetapi lebih hebat”.

Beliau berkata ini isu serius kerana ia akan dengan jelas melanggar jaminan dan representasi yang dibuat 1MDB kepada bank, di mana perlanggaran itu akan secara automatik menjadi sama seperti “jika berlaku perlanggaran” dalam hampir semua perjanjian pinjaman antara pemberi pinjam dan peminjam.

Pua berkata 1MDB meminjam RM3.5 bilion daripada konsortium 4 bank tempatan - Maybank, RHB, Alliance dan HwangDBS, menambah AmBank dan Affin Bank juga ada “ratusan juta ringgit terdedah kepada 1MDB”.

“Dengan mencetuskan perlanggaran itu, semua pinjaman tertunggak kepada institusi berkenaan akan serta-merta jadi tamat tempoh dan perlu dibayar,” katanya.

1MDB berkata dokumen yang diambil Justo daripada PetroSaudi dan dibocorkan kepada Sarawak Report diubahsuai.

Justo kini dalam tahanan polis di Thailand di mana dia disiasat kerana tuduhan memeras ugut.

Dakwaan menyatakan dia mengubah suai emel diambil daripada PetroSaudi turut dibuat akhbar pro kerajaan New Straits Times, memetik sumber yang namanya tidak disiarkan daripada syarikat keselamatan siber persendirian, Protection Group International (PGI).

Susulan itu, menteri Malaysia menuduh Justo mengubah suai emel sulit yang menyebabkan urus niaga 1MDB terdedah. – tmi


video


1MDB doctored financial statement, claims Pua...

Claiming 1MDB had doctored documents, Petaling Jaya Utara MP Tony Pua urged banks which provided loans to the company to check the financial statements provided to them.

He said the state investment company altered a single word in its March 2014 audited financial statement that was provided to the banks, thus giving a false impression that it had set aside US$1.22 billion (RM4.03 billion) from one of its investments to settle its debts.

He said a paragraph from page 93 of the certified-true copy of the financial statement obtained from the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM) reads:

"As at the date of this report, the amounts received from the redemption of investments of US$1.22 billion (RM4.03 billion) in the (segregated portfolio company) above have been substantially utilised for the purposes of debt interest payment, working capital and payments to Aabar as refundable deposits pursuant to a Settlement Agreement to extinguish the Options Agreement as disclosed in Note 41(ii)(j)."

However in the allegedly doctored document, Pua claimed the word "substantially utilised" was altered to "substantially set-aside".

"I call upon all lenders to 1MDB to peruse through the financial statements with a fine-toothed comb to discover all discrepancies between the original copy lodge with SSM, and the doctored copy in their hands […]

"If discrepancies are found with the financial statements as I have alleged, I call upon the banks to immediately file police reports to protect their interest and that of their shareholders," he told a press conference in Kuala Lumpur today.

Pua said he would run afoul with the Banking and Financial Institutions Act 1989 like Pandan MP Mohd Rafizi Ramli (photo) had done before if he provided reporters with evidence of the tampering, and was evasive when queried if he has the evidence at hand.

However, he said he wouldn’t have made such an allegation that would be easily disproven unless he was confident of its veracity.

“I am happy to be disproved, and be humiliated if proven wrong,” he said.

The DAP publicity chief did not disclose the bank that had been provided with the allegedly doctored documents, but instead cited publicly available information to point out that 1MDB owes Maybank, RHB Bank, Alliance Bank, and HwangDBS Bank RM3.5 billion, and said that other banks like Ambank and Affin bank are also at risk.

In a statement later today, 1MDB slammed Pua for making unsubstantiated allegations regarding the company, saying that such statements impacts the company’s operations and affects its restructuring plan.

'Ensure documents are valid'

Meanwhile, Pua said he believes that his is not the only instance of doctoring that 1MDB had done.

He expressed concern that documents provided by 1MDB to the auditor-general in its probe may have been altered as well.

“The auditor-general would have to be ultra-careful with documents provided by 1MDB to ensure that they are valid and not tampered with.

“If they were, then the conclusions could be very different from what it would arrive at, at the end of the report,” Pua said.

Auditor-general Ambrin Buang (photo) is currently aiming to table an audit of 1MDB to Parliament by the end of the year.

On Thursday last week, he had presented an interim report to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), of which Pua is a part of.

According to Ambrin, his office is still waiting for 1MDB to provide some documents that it has requested, while 1MDB later said it has provided all documents requested and will contact the auditor-general to enquire what other documents it is looking for.

Breach of warranty

PAC chief Nur Jazlan (photo) was reported to have said that the audit did not uncover anything suspicious so far, but clarified on the next day that he did not make such statements.

A source with knowledge of the report had also told Malaysiakini that the audit had found that 1MDB’s management frequently made investment decisions without informing its board of directors, and on had on many occasions provided the board with incomplete or inaccurate information.

Meanwhile according to Pua, the alleged doctoring of documents are tantamount to a breach of warranty by 1MDB, which under typical loan agreements, would trigger an ‘event of default’.

This means all debts owed by 1MDB would immediately become due and payable, Pua said.

However, he conceded that he has no access to 1MDB’s loan agreement, but stressed that this feature is typical of most loan agreements.

In addition, Pua said the doctoring of financial statements is an offence under Section 477A, which deals with the falsification of accounts.

The offence in punishable with up to seven years of imprisonment, a fine, or both.

In its statement, 1MDB countered Pua by saying that dealings with its bankers are governed by contracts and national laws - including confidentiality obligations - but points out that that none of its lenders have declared an event of default for the reasons that Pua stated. - mk


Story kat SINI, SINI dan SINI

Kita tahu apa Najib buat minggu lalu...

Saya bercadang bercakap mengenai Najib, Felda dan FGV. Sesudah memusnahkan Felda, Najib mahu terus memperlekehkan warga Felda.

Sebelum itu, izinkan saya komen sedikit mengenai siasatan pasukan khas ke atas skandal akaun Najib di Ambank.

Saya harap pasukan khas ini lakukan apa terbaik untuk kepentingan negara- bukan kepentingan Najib. Objektif kita ialah selamatkan negara- bukan selamatkan Najib dan Umno.

Negara tidak hancur lebur jika Najib tidak lagi PM. Yang menghancur leburkan negara ialah kepimpinan yang korap dan incompetent.Kita tidak boleh biarkan negara ditadbir oleh crooks.

Najib boleh lari, tapi dia tidak boleh sembunyi selamanya.

Para pembaca budiman tentu sudah membaca kenyataan Najib bahawa dia yakin pasukan penyiasat khas akan membersihkan nama nya. Ini diikuti oleh kenyataan sokongan dari TPM dan beberapa menteri lain.

Kita semua tahu, ini semua kenyataan untuk menghiburkan diri sendiri. Jika pasukan penyiasat khas terdiri dari empat Tan Sri yang duduk dibawah Najib membersihkan nama Najib, rakyat akan menghukum Najib dan 4 orang ini.

Sehingga hari ni- majoriti rakyat percaya itu adalah akaun Najib. Najib pun tidak menafikan nya- dia hanya kata duit itu tidak digunakan untuk dirinya. Lain disebut, lain dijawab. Ini tipikal Najib. Orang ini tidak pernah boleh menjawab terus terang.

Jika demikian, nyatakan bagaimana duit itu digunakan?

Tapi bagaimana jumlah wang yang begitu besar boleh masuk kedalam akaun tanpa pengesanan dari bnm menjadi tanda tanya. Adakah Zeti Akhtar Aziz sudah di compromise?

Jika dapat clearance dari BNM , bererti Zeti bersubahat dalam suatu kes money laundering yang melibatkan PM Malaysia.


The most honourable thing yang Zeti boleh buat ialah meletakkan jawatan sebagai Gabenor bank negara.

Mungkin juga membisu Zeti disebabkan khabar2 angin bahawa suami nya bawah siasatan. Ia berkaitan dengan kontrak mencetak not Ringgit Malaysia. Kedua, ada khabar angin yang menyatakan bahawa suami Zeti ada business deals dengan Jho Low.


 

Nampaknya, si Jho Low ini mengikat satu rangkaian tokoh dalam negara ini untuk memastikan scam untuk curi wang tidak di apa-apakan.

Mengenai aliran keluar masuk wang, Najib memang boleh berdiam diri. Jelas sikap demikian kurang cerdik, sebab pembisuan itu tidak lagi dilihat sebagai elegant silence. Malah tokoh yang mempopularkan frasa elegant silence itu sendiri, sekarang meminta Najib menjawab ya atau tidak.


Musa Hitam pun tidak lagi yakin dengan Najib.

Dia tidak perlu jawab, maka rakyat berhak membuat konklusi mereka sendiri. Konklusi nya ialah Najib seorang crook dan negara kita diperintah oleh crooks yang berusaha mengukuhkan kedudukan dan mempertahankan diri mereka dengan apa cara sekali pun.

Mengenai wang RM2.6 billion dan RM42 million dari SRC- sama ada ianya digunakan untuk tujuan peribadi, ianya hanya memerlukan pihak bank dan Bank negara mengesahkan perkara tersebut. Butiran transaski dan aliran keluar masuk wang dari akaun tidak dapat disorok.

Najib hendak lari mana? Jadi buat sementara waktu, dia menghiburan diri yang sedang gundah gulana.

Najib dengan warga Felda.

Hujung minggu yang baru ini, Najib berbuka dengan peneroka felda Chini 5. Bulan puasa pun mahu kelentong. menipu peneroka yang berminda lurus bendul, bukan sesuatu yang sukar. ia hanya memerlukan sedikit lakunan dan pemberian buah tangan.

bab itu Najib memang terror. Itu cara tipikal Najib. Semua masalah selesai dengan bayaran wang. Mungkin ini sebab Najib ada keinginan kuat mesti banyak wang.

Jawapan nya sudah pun di jangka orang- duit itu digunakan untuk membeli kemenangan untuk Umno dan BN. Ini menerangkan kenapa seorang pun menteri dan MP Umno tidak berbunyi mengenai perara ini. MCA dan MIC dan parti komponen lain pun membisu.

Ini bererti kerajaan yang dibangunkan sekarang ialah sebuah kerajaan yang menang atas membayar dan merasuah pengundi.

Maka objektf kita lebih melaus- kita bukan sahaja melihat kepada usaha untuk dismiss Najib seorang, malahan keseluruhan cabinet nya. Kita mahu kerajaan baru.

Di Felda Chini 5, Pekan Pahang, Najib sekali lagi berbohong kepada warga Felda. Syarikat milik felda, FGV yang disenaraikan, dan sekarang telah digantung/keluar dari penyenaraian, dikatakan masih ada prospeks.

Tolong atok beritahu kawan prospeks apa?

Dan Najib mengaku bahawa jika EPF dan peneroka membantah, maka Felda tidak akan beli 37% kepentingan dalam syarikat Eagle High. 


 Mari kita analisa satu persatu.

Apalah luar biasa nya FGV hendak memperluaskan bisnes perladangan? Bukan kah Felda Holdings buat kerja itu dahulu?

Kita expect FGV buatlah sesuatu yang luar biasa daripada yang tradisinya dilakukan oleh Felda Holdings. Jika FGV meniru apa yang Felda Holdings lakukan, apa special nya apungan FGV?

Special nya ialah apungan itu menghasilkan RM10 billion untuk diagihkan.

Kita tak tahu apa KPF dapat bila dia setuju pindahkan 51% kepentingan dalam FH kepada FGV? Dengan pemindahan itu, Felda memiliki 100% saham Felda Holdings yang diserapkan kedalam FGV. Bila saham dilanggani pada hari pertama atau bilamana semua saham dijual, yang dapat duit itu Felda. Ada Felda beri sebahagian kepada KPF?

FGV ialah 100% milik Felda. FGV pula memegang 49% dalam Felda Holdings yang ada banyak bisnes dan syarikat. Felda hendak senaraikan FGV. Tak bolehlah senarai jika pemilikan separuh separuh. Jadi kena paksa peneroka melepaskan 51% dalam Felda Holdings kepada FGV. Barulah FGV ada assets yang disatukan disamping bisnes dan asset nya yang berasingan.

Cuba peneroka tanya, bila lepaskan 51% dalam FH, apa mereka dapat? Adakah ketika itu mereka ada tempat dalam FGV?

Kita hanya diberitahu, ketika itu, setelah diasak dan ditanya, mana kepentingan peneroka, Isa Samad kata ada peruntukan special 20% dari hasil apungan. Dividend dari apungan saya baca sebagai share dari hasil pengapungan lah. Susah nak baca otak Isa Samad.

Setelah di apung, Felda kutip RM10 billion, berapa peneroka dapat? Kalau 20% mesti ada RM2 billion. Mana RM2 billion itu? Ada dalam akaun KPF? Kalua ada, peneroka terima imbuhan atau tidak.

Kalau RM1 billion di bahagikan kepada 112,000 peneroka, setiap peneroka sepatutnya dapat RM9000 seorang. Saya tak dengar pun peneroka dapat RM9000 seorang jika RM1 billion diagihkan dalam bentuk bonus.

Baru2 ini peneroka yang sokong FGV dapat bonus raya RM900. Jumlah mereka 98,000 orang. Ertinya sekitar 14,000 peneroka tidak dapat. Sudah tentu mereka ini golongan haramjadah. Ini bahasa Najib Tun Razak.  


 
Jadi apa special sangat dan apa prospeks FGV?

Yang melakukan bisnes perladangan dan perniagaan bersangkutan ladang sawit, selama nya dahulu ialah Felda Holdings. Mereka ada 360,000 lebih hektar ladang sawit, ada kilang perahan, ada kilang penapis, ada bisnes lojistiks, dan sebagainya. Dan mereka mengurus lebih 400,000 hektar ladang sawit milik peneroka.

Yang tidak pernah buat bisnes tersebut ialah FGV. Tapi FGV , 100% milik Felda ada 49% dalam Felda Holdings. Isa Samad berjaya auta peneroka supaya memindahkan kepentingan 51% kepada FGV.

Apa mereka dapat dari penyerahan tersebut? Kata nya ada 20% dividen dari hasil apungan. Jika 20%, dan hasil apungan ialah RM10 billion, KPF sepatutnya ada wang tunai sebanyak RM2 bilion.

Ada atau tidak? 112, 635 peneroka diseluruh negara mesti taanya perkara ini.

Dosa yang paling besar Najib dan Isa Samad lakukan ialah membenarkan FGV ambil alih bisnes asas Felda Holidngs. Masa depan felda holdings dan peneroka diserahkan kepada FGV. Sebagai imbuhan apa Felda dapat?

Felda dapat mengutip sewa sebanyak RM250 juta setahun untuk 99 tahun. Itu pun kadar sewa yang amat murah iaitu sekitar RM700/hektar. Secara bandingan Boustead sewa RM3000/hektar.

Dan suatu peratusan dari bisnes perladangan FGV. Kalau FGV kerugian sepanjang zaman- apa macam?

Yang tak pernah buat perladangan ialah FGV. FGV diujudkan untuk melabur dalam bisnes teknoloji dan di luar negara.

Yang berladang ialah Felda Holdings dan Felda Plantations. Itu biasa kepada mereka. Luar biasa hanya kepada FGV.


Kalau saya seorang peneroka, saya bengang dengan Najib. Menipu dan pedaah tak habis2.

Kata Najib: Walaupun saham FGV susut nilai, tapi FGV masih ada projek lagi. Kita tidak akan beli 37% kepentingan dalam syarikat kawan saya Peter Sondakh jika EPF dan peneroka bantah. Kita tak akan belanja RM 2.5 billion sebab kalau kita keluar wang banyak itu, kantong Felda hampir kering kontang.   



Nilai permodalan pasaran atau market capitalisation Felda/FGV hanya 34% sahaja berbanding dengan nilai ketika apungan 3 tahun dahulu. Ini bukan susut nilai yang sedikit. Ini kejatuhan yang besar. Susut nilai sebanyak 66% bukan kecil kecuali Najib ingat peneroka Chini 5 bodoh belaka.

Kita tidak hendak dengar alasan tok nenek mengenai pasaran itu dan ini. Semua faktor ini diambil kira dengan analisa yang canggih semasa hendak pengapungan dahulu. Pembeli potential bukan main lagi dinyanyikan lagu yang muluk2. Akhirnya yang membeli ialah pembeli institusi dan pembeli runcit.

Apungan FGV menghasilkan RM10 bilion untuk Felda. Daripada jumlah ini berapa Felda dapat, berapa KPF dapat? Setelah apungan , kepentingan peneroka melalui ejen2 mereka berapa? Berapa KPF dapat? Free atau kena beli? Berapa FAHC dapat- ini suatu entity pasca apungan yang dicipta khas untuk menjaga kepentingan peneroka.

Bolehkah mereka menguasai Felda dan FGV.

Saya tanya soalan ini ialah kerana jika jawapan nya boleh, maka peneroka mesti mengambil langkah membeli kesemua saham termasuk yang tidak dijual oleh FGV kepada awam iaitu 40%.

Dengan Felda sekali beli dan letakkan sumber pengkayaan iaitu bisnes Felda dalam tangan peneroka.

Inilah cara mengukuhkan ekonomi bangsa Melayu. - Ariff Sabri Abdul Aziz, beritadaily







cheers.

No comments: