Will always be firm amid
politicization among rival parties...
Malaysia’s response to the ongoing atrocities in Gaza was always going to be vociferous in spirit and clear in where it felt the principal victimhood and blame lay. It is, after all, a Muslim-majority electoral democracy geographically distant from the theatre of conflict, and therefore also detached from the geoeconomic, geopolitical and security calculus that may complicate the question for others in the Gulf.
The notion of advanced weapons deals from the United States, a nuclear power plant or Israeli tourist dollars as carrots to moderate a long-held position on the issue of Palestine would appear utterly alien to any Malaysian government and the public that elects it.
Thus, in some ways, what is currently coming out of Kuala Lumpur is a continuation of the same stance observable every time escalations occur between the two conflicting sides. In other ways, however, there are subtle differences that underscore a ratcheting up of the rhetoric and posture and may hold broader significance.
The rallies are larger and more numerous. The politicians are queuing up to express essentially the same spirit in novel language and phrases. Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim went on a brief but visible tour meeting the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt, persuading them to take stronger action. The government’s desire to be seen cultivating expressions of solidarity saw it launch Palestine Solidarity Week, resulting in at least one isolated case of overzealousness where fake weapons were brandished in a school.
Cynics will point to the distinctly performative aspect of the entire Malaysian enterprise vis-à-vis Palestine, especially considering the limited observable effects these efforts have had on the state of affairs in Gaza, at least thus far. That may be an incomplete reading, not least since the diplomatic interventions required to change events on the ground are far larger than what Malaysia can accomplish alone. The question ought to be less about “What has Malaysia achieved?” and more about the perennial “Why is there not a more collective and coordinated intervention by a coalition of countries?”
Nonetheless, even performative indignation merits examination, if nothing else to consider how this moment – and Malaysia’s meeting of it – may prove to be a unique inflection point in anticipating longer-term trends.
For example, we should note the far-reaching and multitudinous impact of social media’s proliferation on the war of narratives, pun intended. A new generation of media-savvy – often Palestinian – commentators and communicators have been challenging the usual portrayals and tropes on global news networks, and are able to crystallise arguments that most Malaysians already intuitively believe.
More visually and distressingly, some of the clips on social media platforms need no interlocutor to convey the horror of genocide occurring practically in real-time. Additionally, algorithms serve to sharpen the divide – in the tribalism of a war this emotive, we are likely to see more reaffirming content and less of any opposing or even mitigating positions.
In other words, the scale of death and destruction made vivid to the world by the unprecedented reach and viscerality of digital content means that passions are more acute for more people than usual. If the tragedy continues for much longer, and these same social media properties contribute to a certain permanence of such heightened passions, the implications may reverberate for years. Crucially, the present atrocities are also occurring at a time when multipolarity is the new reality, and especially so for the part of the world Malaysia is in.
Often, great power competition is characterised as a challenge for the smaller countries. But at times it also presents such countries with some independence of manoeuvre, without paying too high a geopolitical tax, simply by the absence of a single hegemon. If anything, despite the various pronouncements about its Indo-Pacific strategy, one presumes this latest tragedy on top of the ongoing war in Ukraine may lead the US to divert attention away from a region that is already not the highest on its priority list.
The countries in Southeast Asia are aware of this likelihood, as China surely is. Continuous American support for Israel’s military excesses, typified by its vote against the UN General Assembly’s resolution calling for a humanitarian ceasefire, will represent a further waning of US influence and goodwill in this region – it is noteworthy not all of its allies voted with it. Malaysia and Indonesia’s boisterous rhetoric does not exist outside this reality of a multipolar order, in which the US is likely distracted and weakened reputationally while China’s differing posture does not go unnoticed.
Finally, while deciphering the actions and rhetoric observed in Malaysia should not begin and end with the country’s domestic political considerations, it regrettably remains a fundamental part of understanding what happens here and anticipating how it might evolve.
Already, there are accusations being hurled back and forth about rivals either not doing enough, going overboard or milking the issue for attention. Expect the politicisation to continue as all parties compete for Malay-Muslim approval while keeping the sizeable non-Muslim minority either untroubled or on board by rightly highlighting the humanitarian dimensions of this tragedy. On that score, Malaysians will hope that amidst all the noise and complex and adulterated motivations, the humanitarian assistance they send – emphatically not a performative intervention – will find its way to the human beings who need it most urgently. - Shahril Hamdan,scmp
Lebih baik boikot pelancungan
di Saudi dari McD...
Tak salah nak Boikot McD tanda solidariti kita kpd Rakyat Palestine.. Tetapi jangan terlebih semangat..Gunakan kebijaksanaan akal..berlebih-lebih menjadikan sasaran kepada McD sehinggakan pekerja McD pun kau orang sasarkan...
Kalau diukur duit yang mengalir ke US dan Isreal, yang benar benar menguntungkan US dalam geopolitik mereka di Timur Tengah, yang patut diboikot itu Saudi, bukan McD.
Saudi dan UAE antara pelanggan tetap, membeli Senjata dari US, perjanjian tahun 2022 saja lebih USD 5 Billion ..manakala UAE lebih USD 2.25 billion.. Itu baru dari senjata, belum sektor oil & gas seperti ARAMCO. Hakikatnya, itulah barter trade US dan Saudi..
Selama ini yang membiayai Jihadist, menghancurkan negara2 Umat Islam dari senjata itu datang dari Negara teluk ni..inilah gamabran Petrodollar. Kekuatan ekonomi US datang dari penjualan senjata, perang dan minyak..
Jadi kalau nak jumpa kayangan Saudi,UAE bincang nasib rakyat Palestine. Buat aku gelak jer.. Tapi nak fahamkan bani Melayu memang susah.. Kau orang kalau pergi Umrah, jangan gatai gatai bawa bendera Palestine.. silap2 kena tangkap.. Kalau bawa gambar artis KPOP ngan Hollywood ok lagi.. - Ipohmali
Walaun fitnah tak boleh takbir di sekolah...
Fitnah MP PAS Kepala Batas Ustazah Dr Siti Mastura...
A Jew man support 4 Palestine...
cheers.
No comments:
Post a Comment