12 February 2019

Hadi kafirkan UMNO,dulu rakan sekatil DAP...


Umat Islam bertanya apakah Hj Hadi ulamak atau ular dalam semak? Lebai-lebai puyuh super taksub merhaban memuja ketua mereka seolah-olah dia super maksum seperti Nabi. Inilah manusia super munafiq yg mengkafirkan UMNO, memecahbelahkan ummah dan keluarga akibat fatwa songsangnya dalam Amanat Hj Hadi. 

Fatwa songsangnya juga yg menyebabkan berlaku sembahyang jumaat dua imam di masa lalu. Tidak ada nas dalam al-qur'an Allah merestui mengkafirkan sesama Islam, malah Allah menjadikan manusia berbagai bangsa, warna kulit, berbagai bahasa untuk berkenalan antara satu dengan lain.

Oleh kerana PAS bencikan UMNO di masa lalu sebagai musuh politik maka ia sanggup pula ahlan wasahlan dengan DAP, parti yg dipimpin oleh kafir. Walau pun Hj Hadi tidak makan babi namun PAS sanggup merhaban dengan DAP. Mengapa? 

PAS parti politik oportunis, imoral yg sanggup memperdagangkan Islam seperti menjual keropok lekor dan budu di pasar, kerana hendak menumbangkan UMNO, dan berkongsi kuasa dengan DAP. Akhirnya Allah memperlihatkan kebajingan perjuangan PAS yang memperdagangkan Islam demi memburu kuasa.


Image result for amanat hj hadi

Kini PAS mengecam DAP yang menjadi musuh ketatnya. Pelek bin hairan Hj Hadi dan lebai-lebai puyuh yg super taksub merhaban dengan UMNO pula yg pernah dikafirkan Hj Hadi itu. Dimanakah letak kewibawaan, maruah dan ketakwaan Islam yg diperjuangkan PAS? 

Sampai sekarang Hj Hadi tetap dengan fatwa songsangnya mengkafirkan UMNO kerana dia masih belum bertaubat dan menarik balik fatwa songsangnya itu. Apakah umat Islam yg berpegang teguh pada al-qur'an dan hadis Nabi boleh menerima ajaran songsang, super munafiq sebagai rakan perjuangan membela Islam dan memperkukuhkan perpaduan ummah? 

Nahe, nahe. Ahli-ahli UMNO khasnya, dan masyarakat Islam amnya dinasihatkan agar berhati-hati ajaran sesat Hj Hadi dan PAS yang memecahbelahkan umat Islam. - Yahaya Ismail

Image may contain: 2 people, text
J/kuasa disiplin PAS perlu bertindak...

Sejak semalam telah tular rakaman video ini. Ia seperti dalam satu majlis ceramah. Orangnya mirip timbalan presiden Pas, Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man. Dari petikan ini mendedahkan penceramah ini marah kepada tindakan orang yang merakam ucapan orang bernama “Nik Abduh” kemudian disebarkan. Orang macam Tuan Ibrahim ini marah dengan perbuatan itu dan menganggapnya pengkhianat.

Secara tidak langsung apabila orang ini menyebut nama Nik Abduh dengan rakaman disebarkan itu, bermakna rakaman yang dinafikan sebagai Nik Abduh itu sudah benar suara Nik Abduh. Ertinya secara tidak lansgsung Taun Ibrahim mengesahkan rakaman itu.




Persoalan di sini, apabila semua keadaan sudah jelas dan terjawab, dimanakah pendirian Pas. Kalau perbuatan menyebarkan rakaman suara Nik Abduh itu satu pengkhianatan, Pas patut mengambil tindakan disiplin kepada anggota parti itu. Ahli yang khianat perlu diambil tindakan seperti mana ahli-ahli yang bersalah sebelum ini.

Dalam hubungan ini dua individu yang Pas perlu mengambil tindakan, Nik Abduh dan Zaharuddin, orang yang disebut sebagai merosakkan hubungan persahabatan dan bersangka buruk kepada rakan. Jawatankuasa disiplin parti itu tidak boleh apolegetik dengan perkara ini kerana itu adalah tugas yang diamanahkan kepada anda.- MSO


Image may contain: 1 person, closeup and text

Daripada menyaman Sarawak Report. Yang Najib pun tak berani nak saman. Baik lagi menyaman Husam dan Rafizi.. Tindakan menyaman Husam dan Rafizi adalah tindakan yang betul daripada menyaman Sarawak Report dan bicara di London..

Menyaman Husam dan Rafizi membolehkan perbicaraan dijalankan di Malaysia dan lebai2 Pas tak boleh nak putar belit cerita pada ahli2.. Sepertimana yang lebai2 lakukan terhadap saman dan tarik semula saman terhadap Sarawak report.. bermacam siri pembohongan lebai2 tentang isu itu..

Cuma nak ingatkan lebai2 PAS.. Husam kebiasaannya tidak akan bercakap pada perkara yang beliau tidak benar2 tahu dan beliau juga tidak bercakap tanpa beliau memiliki bukti.. Seban tu arwah TG.Nik Aziz kata Husam adalah budak cerdik.


Related image

Begitu juga Rafizi patut lebai2 PAS saman jugak kerana Rafizi kata yang dia banyak bukti tentang RM90 juta tersebut.. Dengan menyaman Rafizi membolehkan ahli2 Pas tahu bukti2 tersebut dan tahu bagaimana lebai2 menipu atau tidak..

Lagi pun Rafizi dan banyak kali mencabar PAS agar menyaman beliau.. Sahutlah cabar Rafizi itu dengan kesombongan dan keegoan PAS yang maha hebat.. Selamat menyaman wahai lebai2 PAS..

Seronok juga dapat ikuti perbicaraan yang berlangsung di Malaysia sendiri.. Atlease satu episod yang dapat menyedarkan ahli2 PAS bahawa selama ini mereka ditipu hidup2.. - f/bk Eddie Adam Benjamin


"TAK BERMAKNA" - enta kata...

1. Ayat lejen 2019 : "Selesai luar mahkamah TAK BERMAKNA mengaku".

2. Maaf, nak minta izin nak gelak ya..anyway selain ayat tu, ada ke ayat lain enta nak "mitigate the damage" YB? Tak pe kami sangat memahami. Ini pula versi "TAK BERMAKNA" kami.

a. Selesai luar mahkamah TAK BERMAKNA isu terima RM 90 juta dari...pun dah dikira selesai.

b. Kata tak pernah mengaku TAK BERMAKNA kami semua percaya.

3. Kata tak mengaku TAK BERMAKNA tak buat perkara yang tidak diakui itu.

4. Saman , lepas tu sat kata dah menang, sat kata minta tolong sgt sgt ahli tolong Presiden bayar wang peguam, sat tarik balik saman , sat kata Sarawak Report tak ada bukti, sat kata tarik balik saman tak mesti mengaku.. itu semua , bagi kami, TAK BERMAKNA orang tak anggap yang antum semua tak cakap berbelit belit!!! - YB Sepang.

Image may contain: 1 person, eyeglasses, text and closeup

Petunjuk manakah yang lebai mahu dustakan ?

1. Saman fitnah kemudian tarik balik.
2. Terma penyelesaian dirahsiakan.
3. Husam, Rafizi dan Mahfuz tidak disaman.
4. Rakaman audio Nik Abduh yang disahkan tulen.
5. 40 orang saksi mendengar pengakuan Nik Abduh.
6. Kemewahan melampau pemimpin2 Pas.
7. Tujuan 90 juta diberikan jelas berlaku.
8. Kerjasama Umno Pas benar berlaku sebelum PRU secara sulit.
9. Pas pertahankan rasuah dan penyelewengan Umno, tidak menyerang.
10. Pas Terengganu terima RM2.5 juta itu benar beserta bukti.
11. Mula nafi kemudian mengaku.
12. SPRM siasat kerana ada asas dan bukti.
13. Terkini, TITM akui pengakuan Nik Abduh sebagai benar. - f/bk

Did MCA elect a “Dr” or an idiot 
as the President of the party?

Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong says he would like to know how Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng became a qualified accountant one year before obtaining a degree. The MCA president pointed out that it was stated on the DAP secretary-general’s personal website (limguaneng.com) that he became a qualified professional accountant in 1983.

Dr Wee, however, pointed out that a search on Monash University’s website showed that Lim only obtained his Bachelor of Economics in 1984.

“I do not doubt Lim’s certification from Monash. But how did Lim become a professional accountant in 1983, a year before obtaining his degree?” Dr Wee asked in a Facebook post on Sunday (Feb 10). Dr Wee, who is Ayer Hitam MP, also questioned if Lim’s “qualified professional accountant” was properly accredited.

I honestly feel embarrassed for MCA party members.

Their elected president, Dr Wee Ka Siong is so bankrupt of ideas, he had to pick up a thread from a fictional website to sensationalize a non-existent issue to gain political capital. He must be the worst MCA President in history, who is willing to make personal attacks, lie, threaten, sell out every principle and the people’s rights, to preserve MCA’s culture of money politics.

MCA-owned The Star reported that he pointed out that it was stated on Lim Guan Eng’s personal website that the latter became a qualified professional accountant in 1983. Dr Wee, however, pointed out that a search on Monash University's website showed that Lim only obtained his Bachelor of Economics in 1984.


Image result for dr wee ka siong n 1mdb

Since Dr Wee has his head planted so deep in the sand, he might be interested to know that the Australian academic calendar ends in November, before the summer break. Therefore, by the end of 1983, Lim has completed and passed all his examinations necessary for him to obtain his degree and qualifications to be an accountant.

The MCA President went to the extent of questioning if Lim's "qualified professional accountant" was properly accredited. "Was it by a local or foreign agency?”

For Dr Wee’s information, Lim had duly received his ‘Certificate of Membership’ in Australian Society of Accountants three months after passing his examinations on 21 Feb 1984. His membership was even before he received his degree certificate on 11 April 1984. Both copies of the certificates are attached.

One would have expected a PhD holder such as Dr Wee to be able to tell the difference between when a person successfully graduated from University as opposed to when he or she receives the ‘official’ certificate, which can be issued 6 months or even a year later!

The real OMG moment however, came with Dr Wee asked "which country accepts an Economics graduate to become a 'qualified professional accountant'?

He obviously doesn’t realise that every University has their own conventions in naming the degrees. Having a “Bachelor of Economics” degree does not mean that Lim didn’t study Accountancy (or he wouldn’t have qualified for the Australian Society of Accountants). Certain schools grant accountancy programs as “Bachelor of Commerce” etc.


Related image

And just so that Dr Wee doesn’t repeat his boo-boo any time in the near future, Oxbridge universities grant only “Bachelor of Arts” degrees for undergraduates regardless of the subject of study. That means whether you graduated in law or physics or economics, you will get a BA (Hons) Oxon or BA (Hons) Cantab to your name. By Dr Wee’s definition of qualification, there would be hundreds of thousands of unqualified and unemployed Oxbridge graduates loitering around the world.

Dr Wee demanded that "for a minister who always stresses on the concept of Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT), please explain and don't be quiet.”

Well, the explanation is given. The question is, will Dr Wee come clean as to whether MCA has received millions of funds from the former Prime Minister, Dato’ Seri Najib Razak which originated from 1MDB? Why does Dr Wee dare not admit that MCA’s accounts were frozen? And when is MCA going to return RM16.5 million back to the people? And is there any more money from 1MDB apart from the RM16.5 million that Dr Wee or MCA is not disclosing.

Please explain and don’t be quiet. Will the pro-BN papers pursue Dr Wee to ask that he comes clean? Please don’t try to distract Malaysians from the all-important issue of the RM50 billion 1MDB scandal with frivolous and baseless personal attacks against the Finance Minister.

Finally, the Minister’s lawyers have advised that he reserve his rights to file defamatory claims against any pro-BN newspapers who continue to print lies to diminish and question his position, stature and credibility. - Tony Pua

Kalu temu pembeli cam ni apa U all nak buat?

Image may contain: text

Image may contain: 4 people, people smiling, text
Image result for dr.m n anwar
cheers.

No comments: