When Awang brother thought opposition parties are jealous......

The opposition parties are jealous of Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's success in developing the country, especially in taking care of the poor, Deputy Finance Minister Awang Adek Hussin said today.

He said the opposition parties were ready to slander the prime minister and the government because they could not do for the states under opposition rule what Najib had done for the country.

"But ultimately the people will assess what the opposition has done and what the government led by the prime minister has done," he told reporters after opening the Pasir Mas 1Malaysia Clinic.

Awang Adek said the Amanah Saham Wawasan 2020-Bandar (ASW-2020-Bandar) programme launched by Najib yesterday was testimony that Najib cared about the plight of the poor not only in the rural areas but also in the towns. Najib launched the ASW-2020-Bandar programme with an allocation of RM100 million to help generate additional income for the hardcore poor and the urban poor.

source:bernama

What success is he talking about? Just issuing ASW 2020-Bandar, so the poor can participate in the bond market, is this a success?

What constitute 'success' in Najib's 1Malaysia?........

1. when buying a pussy and wants the nation to give it a name.
2. when there is sodomy without penetration.
3.when Pak Jib reduce Singapore's Link Kedua toll and increase toll for Penang bridge.
4. when he(Pak Jib) claim in the Dewan Rakyat that no promises of allocations were made during by-elections, but in fact he (Pak Jib) said: 'You help me, I help you. If you deliver Robert Lau, I will allocate RM5 million',”
5. when MACC hurriedly investigated Selangor MB Khalid Ibrahim's car maintenance and his Hari Raya Korban's 46 cows, but MACC is silent on Khir Toyo & family all paid Disneyland trip and against Taib Mahmud's RM3 billion empire.
6.when crony VK Lingam is so free though the Lingam video case decision point otherwise.
7.when they allow direct negotiation on double track rail for crony,Gamuda.
8.when they allow crony Berjaya's V.Tan to monopolise all gaming licenses, including sports betting.
9.when they allow IPP for YTL, Ananda, Genting,while the rakyat pays TNB bills thru their nose.
10.when political pariahs are being appointed as Ministers and Assistant Ministers thru the backdoor of Parliament.
11.when their newly appointed Transport Minister declared, there will be no further PKFZ investigation.
12.when there are thousands of primary and secondary school children who cannot read and write, yet Bik Mama Rosmah's Projek Pintar is given top priority.

and the list goes on and on........ thats succees!!!

cheers.

Pandainya Najib 1Malaysia - Tol P.Pinang naik, tol Singapura turun......

Ibarat kera dihutan disusukan, anak dirumah mati kelaparan, begitulah nasib rakyat Malaysia khususnya di Pulau Pinang selepas Najib dengan bijaknya menawarkan pengurangan tol 30% bagi jambatan kedua yang menghubungkan Johor dan Singapura sedangkan untuk Pulau Pinang caj tol dinaikkan 34%.

Saya bukan nak kata orang yang gunakan jambatan kedua Johor-Singapura sebagai Kera, tapi itu hanyalah pepatah orang-orang Melayu sebagai mengambarkan ketidakadilan yang berlaku.

Saya setuju dengan pandangan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang, Lim Guan Eng (DAP) yang mengalu-alukan pengurangan tol dijambatan kedua Johor-Singapura itu kerana sebagai rakyat kita mahu semua tol dikurangkan dan dihapuskan terus. Kalau kerajaan nak hapuskan terus Tol berkenaan pun bagus.

Saya yakin, ramai rakyat yang tidak puas hati dengan layanan Najib kepada Singapura yang mungkin sebagai melengkapkan perjanjian durian Malaysia-Singapura. Tiap kali ada mesyuarat khas antara Malaysia dan Singapura pasti ada durian, sebab itu saya panggil perjanjian Durian.

Kenapa Kerajaan hanya beri tawaran kepada Singapura. Kenapa tak nak turunkan Tol Jambatan Pulau Pinang dan semua tol yang ada di negara ini khususnya di Lembah Klang?

Pendapatan rakyat yang bekerja dalam negara bukan macam pelancong Singapura yang berulang alaik dari tambak Johor setiap minggu. Rakyat Malaysia begitu banyak berbelanja untuk Tol setiap hari. Mana-mana pergi kat lembah klang ini pasti ada tol.

Hapuskan tol, jagalah kebajikan rakyat bukan sibuk makan durian sahaja.- Herman Samsudeen

source - harakahdaily

Singapura adalah asset besar kepada Najib 1Malaysia. Pak Jib bakal menikmati bebagai imbuhan daripada negara jiran Johor itu. Apakah imbuhan yang bakal diterima, sama-sama tunggu dan lihat.

Pulau Pinang apa sangat,kerajaannya pula adalah dari pembangkang. Lagi pun apa faedah yang Pak Jib boleh terima daripada kerajaan PR Pulau Pinang ini?

Pak Jib sedaq, mai 3 kali PRU pun, BN tetap akan tersungkur di sini. Sebagai hadiah kepada rakyat Pulau Pinang kerana mengundi PR, terima saja kenaikkan tol jambatan Pulau Pinang nanti...

cheers.

MP motion against Najib 1Malaysia...........

Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's claim in the Dewan Rakyat yesterday that no promises of allocations were made during by-elections may land him in hot water. In Najib's written parliamentary reply to Wong Ho Leng (DAP-Sibu), the premier said RM37.7 million in allocations were approved during the Sibu by-election, but stressed that they were not carrots for votes.

Today, Chong Chieng Jen (DAP-Bandar Kuching) responded by attempting to file a motion against Najib for misleading the House and refer him to the parliamentary rights and privileges committee.

Speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia deferred his decision pending a study on the matter.

“We have evidence of him making a speech in Rejang Park on YouTube. He (Najib) said: 'You help me, I help you. If you deliver Robert Lau, I will allocate RM5 million',” a vexed Chong told reporters later.

Speaker cannot direct ministerial answers

Earlier, Fong Po Kuan (DAP-Batu Gajah) sought an explanation from Pandikar over the deferment.

“If the ministers are always giving inconsistent answer, this shows that they are irresponsible. I am seeking advice from you (Pandikar), what is the rule that I can use to make sure that the ministers conduct their duties satisfactorily,” she asked.

Pandikar replied that under Standing Order 23, the speaker cannot compel the ministers to answer to her satisfaction.

“I cannot be asked to judge the answers of the ministers. In fact, if the ministers decide not to answer at all any questions asked, this decision cannot be debated in order to indict someone for misleading the House,” he explained.

Pandikar added that there are three facts to be established before someone can be indicted for misleading the House.

“First the fact must be wrong. And when the fact is found to be untrue, the person still maintains that it is. That constitute an intent to mislead the House,” he said, thus maintaining that he cannot decide on Chong's motion immediately without an investigation.

Vague reply

Yesterday, in his written reply to Wong, Najib said that the government has never promised projects or programmes for the public during by-election campaigns, “including in Sibu”. He claimed that such activities that were implemented during the by-elections were planned before the event. Of the RM37.7 million in allocations, RM28.67 million were spend on cash contributions (sumbangan/bantuan).

Wong was furious over the scant reply from Najib and demanded a full breakdown of allocations, especially the 66 items listed as cash contributions.

“We don't know what these 66 items are. Do they include the infamous RM5 million promise?” he asked.

source:malaysiakini

This Pandikar guy is not a "pendikar" when BN MPs including Pak Jib are involved in misleading the house.

But when come to opposition members he will do what so ever to make sure the opposition member "tentu kena punya", here he is a real pendikar...........

cheers.

Asri - Why is the government lying on JI and Wahabbism......

Current and former Perlis muftis Juanda Jaya and Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin have come out to blast the BN-led government for its “lies” and “slander” over claims of links between local religious figures and terror network Jemaah Islamiah. In a joint statement issued earlier today, Juanda and Asri attacked the federal government and the police for playing up issues of national security “for the interests of certain quarters.”

“What has been claimed by many parties, especially the opposition, that the issue of national security involving the threat of terrorists has been played up by the government appears to have strong foundations,” the religious scholars said.

In a briefing at a hotel in Sepang, Selangor, on Monday night, sources told Malaysiakini that Zamihan Mat Zin, a senior official with the government's Islamic Development Department (Jakim), had alleged Asri and Juanda to be linked with the puritan Wahhabi strain of Islamic thought. Other than Asri and Juanda, the other figures that Zamihan was said to have alleged were promoting Wahhabism included former menteri besar Shahidan Kassim and PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang.

Even the Muslim-based activist group JIM was not exempted from Zamihan's tirade against Wahhabis. Apart from the movement's terrorist threat, participants at the briefing were said to have been told also by Zamihan that JI members subscribed to Wahhabism.

Claims 'extremely wicked'

Apart from the movement's terrorist threat, participants at the briefing were also told by Zamihan that JI members subscribed to Wahhabism. Juanda, a member of the National Fatwa Council and a visiting fellow at Oxford University, and Asri, who has gone back to lecturing at USM, described the claims as being “extremely wicked.”

“We strenuously deny these accusations and remind the rakyat that whichever government or political party that is willing to gamble on the issue of national security for the interests of certain quarters is a government that is irresponsible.

“A government that resorts to lies, plotting and smearing the character of individuals for its narrow interests, to violating the people's rights and manipulating issues of national security is very dangerous for the harmony of a country.

“At the same time, we call on all layers of the people to reject all forms of violence, whether it comes in the shape of (physical) action or thought. And we call upon, once again, for the people not to support any party gambles away the country's security for narrow interests.”

Citing Malaysiakini's report on the briefing, Asri and Juanda said "the rakyat knows our views, which are for an Islam that calls for being progressive, social and religious harmony, against fanaticism and every form of extremism."

"The issues that we bring forward capture the attention of people of all religions and ethnicity because they reflect an Islam that is tolerant and suitable for a pluralist society. This can be found in our writings and statements," they said.

“For this reason, Zamihan and the police must be responsible for this fitnah (slander), they added.

On claims that Hadi was connected to extremism, Juanda and Asri said that as a former menteri besar of Terengganu and current president of an established political party, Hadi and PAS “have long abided by the principles of the country's system of democracy."

That Shahidan - who is an Umno supreme council member - has also been implicated by his own party indicates “Umno and BN's willingness to kill their own friends in the gamble for political gain.”

JIM, similarly, had “made valuable contributions” to the country and should not be associated with the “disgusting” label of terrorism.

Juanda and Asri demanded that the police explain to the public the nature of their relationship with Zamihana (left), who works as a deputy director at Jakim's Institut Latihan Islam Malaysia.

“Who is this Zamihan for him to be used for this wicked agenda?” they asked.

“If the police do not dismiss Zamihan's claims, it means they are under the thumb of the Home Affairs Minister in purposely spreading baseless lies," they added. Zamihan could not be contacted despite repeated attempts by Malaysiakini to reach him.

'Irresponsible'

For the above reasons, Asri and Juanda said the claims by quarters such as Citizens International president SM Idris and Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim that the issue was merely a political ploy appear to have foundations.

“It may even be a large possibility that this is one of the ruling government's dirty political tactics to divert attention away from certain issues.

“With this, we deny strenuously the accusations and remind the rakyat that whichever government or political party that is willing to gamble on the issue of national security for the interests of certain quarters is a government that is irresponsible.

“A government that resorts to lies, plots and smearing the character of individuals for the sake of narrow interests, violates the people's rights and manipulates issues of the country's security is dangerous to a country that seeks harmony.

“At the same time, we call on all layers of the rakyat to reject all forms of violence, whether in deed or in thought... and not to support any party that gambles on the security of the country for the sake of parochial interests.

Baca, Asri,"Kerajaan bohong" di sini dan sini.

source:malaysiakini

The government lied about the Lingam Video Tape,PKFZ,Sime Darby,Teoh Beng Hock,Altantuya,Kugan, Amirulrashid,the economy,etc...etc....and they will keep on lying.......

cheers.

PR ke arah memerintah,nafi 2/3 BN tu agenda lama.....

Meskipun Pakatan Rakyat kini diselubungi kekhuatiran bahawa sokongan Melayu semakin mengalih ke Barisan Nasional, namun tanggapan ini disangkal oleh Zaid Ibrahim, yang tetap optimis bahawa matlamat PR dalam pilihan raya umum ke-13 adalah untuk memerintah di negara ini.

Ketika ditanya apakah langkah seterusnya seandainya Barisan Nasional berjaya mengembalikan majoriti dua pertiganya dalam parlimen, Zaid Ibrahim terus menyifatkan matlamat "menafikan majoriti dua pertiga BN dalam parlimen" sebagai "agenda lama", malah yakin bahawa PR akan mara untuk menjadi kerajaan persekutuan di Malaysia.

"Saya tidak berfikir untuk menafikan dua pertiga BN, itu agenda lama. Kami akan memerintah di negara ini. Kamu orang (wartawan) tak percaya, itu masalahnya. Kamu ingat ini tidak boleh dilakukan," tegasnya.

"Jadi, Dato, anda yakin bahawa PR akan memerintah?" tanya wartawan lagi.

"Memang! (Of course)" jawabnya dengan tangkas. Zaid Ibrahim menambah, "Kerajaan ini sudah terdesak (desparate). Mengapa mereka membelanjakan RM150 juta (dalam PRK)? Kerana mereka takut!"

Beliau seterusnya melontarkan satu soalan kepada wartawan, "Apakah anda rasa kerajaan yang yakin dengan dirinya, akan membelanjakan wang sedemikian? Ini persoalan yang harus anda tanya."

Walaupun satu soal selidik Merdeka Center baru-baru ini memperlihatkan peningkatan tahap kepuasan terhadap Perdana Menteri Najib Razak kepada 72%, namun Zaid Ibrahim tetap mendakwa bahawa BN masih tidak yakin untuk berdepan dengan rakyat. Pembubaran DUN Perak, PRK di DUN Kota Siputeh, antara cabaran Zaid Ibrahim kepada BN, seandainya kerajaan BN mahu membuktikan keyakinan terhadap prestasi dirinya.

Tentang hakisan sokongan Melayu/Islam.

Zaid Ibrahim tidak menyetujui pandangan sedemikian, sebagaimana yang dinyatakan dalam Kongres tahunan PKR.

"Kamu ada angka? Kamu tidak mempunyai angka..." katanya kepada wartawan. Apabila wartawan merujuk kepada keputusan PRK Hulu Selangor, calon PKR yang kecundang ini berkata, "Mestilah, apabila kamu merasuah orang dengan RM50 ribu, mestilah (orang undi kamu). Tapi ia tidak bermakna orang Melayu meninggalkan Pakatan Rakyat."

"Peneroka FELDA, apakah kamu menganggap mereka ada hak untuk memilih? Tak ada. Semua dikawal. Apabila kamu kata kami hilang sokongan Melayu, kami menang di kawasan lain, cuma kalah undi FELDA, tentera, polis. Melayu dalam pasukan polis, tentara tak ada pilihan," jelasnya.

Beliau menyambung, "Kamu perlu bezakan apa Melayu. Di semua kawasan lain, saya menang. Jadi, adalah tidak benar (untuk mendakwa PR hilang sokongan Melayu)." - Lim Hong Siang

source:merdekareview

cheers.

Govt. paid RM7.3 billion for Scorpene deal........

The government has paid a whopping 1.341 billion euro (RM7.3 billion)* for the two Scorpene submarines, the purchase of which is currently under probe by the French courts for corruption.

Defence Minister Zahid Hamidi revealed the expenses in a written answer to Batu MP Tian Chua's questions in Parliament today.

It is believed that another RM600 million was to be paid for maintenance services over the next six years.

“The maintenance contract is still under negotiation and will be finalised in the near future,” Zahid said.

Out of the total paid, 114.96 million euro (RM574.8 million) went to Perimekar Sdn Bhd, which is owned by Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's close associate Abdul Razak Baginda.

This amount, paid for “coordination and support services provided to the Royal Malaysian Navy” including training, represents 10 percent of the total price of the two submarines, worth 969.15 million euros (RM4.85 billion). It is this portion which is currently investigated by the French authorities as it is suspected that this could be "commissions" instead of "support services", and as such illegal under French laws.

In addition, the government also paid French naval defence company DCNS 37.5 million euros (RM177.5 million) for "support and test equipment".

Ballooning maintenance fee

Chua had asked the defence minister to detail full expenditure pertaining to the two Scorpene submarines, as well as details relating to a separate purchase of submarine missiles from France and Italy.

To the second question, the minister revealed that the government has paid 219.265 million euros (RM1.1 billion) for the submarine missiles, which are expected to be delivered in 2013.

Commenting on the Scorpene issue to reporters at the Parliament lobby, Chua said that the government had compelled DCNS to have a joint-venture with a local company to provide the maintenance services.

He added that after they had set up in Malaysia with local partners Boustead Holdings Berhad, the quoted maintenance fee for 2010 ballooned to RM270 million.

This constitutes nearly 50 percent of the RM600 million six-year maintenance fee quoted by DCNS prior to the joint venture.

DCNS is being investigated for allegedly received kickbacks from the deals.

The company with a history for corruption was in May ordered by Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce's International Court of Arbitration to pay the Taiwanese government close to RM3 billion as penalty over “unauthorised commission” on the sale of warships in 1991.

(*The exchange rate is based on 1 euro = RM5 (which was the rate between December 2009 and January 2010)

source:malaysiakini

Macam ini punya belanja tak heran kalu Malaysia jadi bankrap pada 2019.

Perlukah bayar 114.96 million euro (RM574.8 million) kepada Perimekar Sdn Bhd,sebuah syarikat RM2.00 milik Razak Baginda, rakan 'kongsi' Pak Jib. Ini bayaran komisyen,
konsultasi atau saja kasi?

Pasal itulah Altantuya sanggup datang dari jauh untuk tuntut haknya.

Namun demikian bukan wang ringgit yang diterima sebaliknya ledakan C4 ubatnya......

cheers.

Bila lidah SPR bercabang...........

Timbalan Pengerusi SPR, Wan Ahmad Wan Omar mengatakan SPR akan tunggu surat dari Speaker Dewan Rakyat sama ada akan mengisytiharkan kerusi Parlimen Batu yang diwakili oleh Tian Chua (PKR) kosong atau tidak.

Malah Wan Ahmad berkata SPR hanya menunggu makluman rasmi daripada Pejabat Speaker Dewan Rakyat bagi membuat sebarang keputusan dan tindakan.

Dalam kes kekosongan kerusi DUN di Perak SPR tidak mahu merujuk kepada surat yang dihantar oleh Speaker Dewan Undangan Negeri ketika itu.

Bila menerima surat rasmi daripada Speaker SPR pula menjadi hakim untuk mengkaji kesahihan surat tersebut dan sebagainya. Kenapa SPR berani mempertikai keputusan Speaker DUN Perak?

Dalam kes DUN Kedah pula, Speaker Dewan Undangan Negeri Kedah sudah memaklumkan perihal kekosongan kerusi DUN Kota Seputeh. Anehnya, SPR pula tiba-tiba memberikan begitu banyak alasan bagi melaksanakan pilihanraya kecil di sana.

Kenapa SPR bersikap double standard?

Kerusi Parlimen Batu adalah milik pembangkang. Maka SPR terpaksa akur dengan arahan tuannya supaya diadakan pilihanraya kecil.

Dalam kes DUN di Perak dan Kedah ia milik BN, maka SPR khuatir akan kehilangan kerusi-kerusi tersebut.

cheers.

Tian Chua: I'm still Batu MP.......

A judge in the Kuala Lumpur High Court has decided that there is no need for him to review his decision to impose the reduced fine of RM2,000 on Batu MP Tian Chua. Justice Ghazali Cha said that as he has stepped down (functus officio), the decision on the fine stands.

However, according to lawyers for Chua, the judge maintains that his intention is clear and that he does not want a by-election to be called for the parliamentary seat in Kuala Lumpur.

Lawyer Ranjit Singh said he is aware of the Supreme Court decision PP vs Leong Ying Ming (1993) over the definition of 'not less than RM2,000'. The Supreme Court judge then had ruled that the phrase 'not less than five years' would mean five years and one day.

Chua was found guilty of biting the arm of a police officer while being arrested at a protest three years ago near the Parliament building. The PKR politician, who was elected Batu MP in 2008, was charged under Section 32 of the Penal Code, with intentionally causing injury to a police constable on duty.

Last October, the Kuala Lumpur Magistrate's Court had sentenced Chua to six months in jail and fined him RM3,000. On appeal, the High Court upheld the conviction but reduced his fine RM3,000 or two months' jail in default. Chua told reporters this morning that he is still Batu MP.

"I will serve my constituents and will go to Parliament after this," he said after his lawyers and the prosecutors met the judge in chambers.

This was to clarify whether his decision last Thursday would effectively disqualify Chua as a MP, based on Article 40 of the federal constitution. Chua is represented by Ranjit, Amer Hamzar Arshad and Razlan Hadri Zulkifli. The prosecutors were led by DPPs Mohd Hanafiah Zakaria and Lee Keng Fatt.

source:malaysiakini

The judge main intention of reducing the fine was to avoid a by-election. Whether there should be a by-election or not is for the judge to determine. The fine is RM2,000 but it's up to the EC, not the judge, to decide Tian Chua's status as MP.

Isn't it obvious that whatever judgement is tied to the government's intentions? Is the judge supposedly representing the BN government here........

cheers.