31 October 2009

UMNO boleh ambil kertas lap juboq ini.........

Good riddance to bad rubbish.



Sampah sarap ini patut dijadikan kertas lap juboq dan baling saja dalam tong sampah dari dulu lagi.

Biaq pilah kalu UMNO nak pungutnya.............
baca di sini.

cheers.

29 October 2009

Adun Pelabuhan Klang keluar PKR & sokong UMNO.......

Seorang lagi wakil rakyat PKR meninggalkan parti itu dan menjadi ADUN bebas - kali ini di Selangor selepas dua di Perak awal tahun ini dan seorang di Kedah pada Ogos.

ADUN Pelabuhan Klang Badrul Hisham Abdullah, sejak beberapa bulan lalu menimbulkan spekulasi bakal menyertai Umno, membuat pengumuman itu di sebuah hotel di Kuala Lumpur sebentar tadi.

Beliau sejak sekian lama menimbulkan masalah dalam parti itu apabila didakwa tidak menjalankan tugasnya sebagai wakil rakyat di situ.

Pagi ini, Menteri Besar Selangor, Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim mengusulkan kepada PKR agar mendesak Badrul Hisham melepaskan jawatan wakil rakyat.

Port Klang assemblyman Badrul Hisham Abdullah has quit PKR, citing a loss of faith in the party leadership, in a move that could spark a crisis in the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) state government. He did not say if he would be joining Umno or any other political party, but he asserted that he would not relinquish his state seat.

His announcement comes just hours after Selangor Mentri besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim had said he wanted the lawmaker to resign as assemblyman for non-performance.
Badrul Hisham won the Port Klang state seat in Election 2008 with 12,397 votes against Barisan Nasional’s Roselinda Abdul Jamil who got 7,990 votes and independent Nazir Mansor with 580.

Early this month, Khalid had said he would decide on Badrul Hisham’s status by the end of October. Speculation had been rife for months now that Badrul Hisham planned to defect to Umno and controversy has plagued the first-term lawmaker since the general election last year due to complaints by voters in his constituency that he was never around and could not be contacted.

source:malaysiakini/malaysian insider

Biarlah pak pandir ini terjun dengan labu-labunya........

cheers.

Jambatan maut - JKR pun tak tau kisahnya.......


Pengarah JKR Perak Datuk Dr Safry Kamal Ahmad memberitahu bahawa pihaknya juga tidak mengetahui kontraktor yang terlibat dengan pembinaan jambatan tersebut.

"Anggaran kos juga kita tidak boleh cakap kerana tidak ada penilaian kos yang dibuat," katanya ketika dihubungi petang ini.

Jelasnya, beliau juga tidak dapat memberi butiran berkenaan kerana maklumat tersebut tidak disampaikan kepadanya dari pihak pentadbiran SK Kuala Dipang, lokasi jambatan maut itu.

"Kalau ikut amalan biasa, kena rujuk kepada JKR terlebih dahulu," kata Dr Safry.

Jelasnya lagi, JKR seharusnya dirujuk memandangkan jambatan itu dibina dalam sebahagian kawasan sekolah.

"Kawasan tapak perkhemahan di seberang sungai itu juga termasuk dalam kawasan sekolah," katanya, sambil menambah struktur itu dibina tanpa merujuk sebarang agensi teknikal.

Jambatan baru sepanjang beberapa puluh meter di belakang kawasan sekolah itu siap dibina kira-kira dua minggu lalu untuk menghubung sekolah dengan tapak perkhemahan.

Dr Safry, yang bakal menganggotai jawatankuasa khas untuk menyiasat kejadian berkenaan seperti diumumkan timbalan perdana menteri semalam, juga berkata:

"Setakat ini kita cuma dapat tahu tiangnya tercabut bersama dengan sangganya, sebab-sebab lain kita belum dapat pastikan lagi.

"Kita akan tengok aspek-aspek teknikal, butir-butir terperinci dalam pembinaannya serta integriti strukturnya."

source:malaysiakini


Gomen Perak dipelarikan oleh gulongan penyamun. Rakyat Perak dah hilang hormat kepada gomen berkenaan. Jadi tak hairanlah peristewa seperti jambatan runtuh boleh berlaku di bawa pentadbiran haram ini. Budaya samun menyamun adalah budaya mereka.

JKR pun tak kenal siapa kontraktor yang membina jambatan ini, apatah lagi orang ramai. Boleh terimakah alasan sebegini? Bukankah pejabat daerah atau JKR negeri tak simpan senarai kontraktor yang terlibat dengan berbagai projek. Kontraktor tahu nak kaut untung tak peduli pasal keselamatan mereka yang menggunakannya.

Nampaknya slogan Najib "rakyat didahulukan dan pencapaian diutamakan" lebih merupakan gimik politik UMNO semata.....

cheers.

28 October 2009

1Perak - DUN sitting under police supervision........


MB Zambry Abd Kadir began the budget speech. There is still no sign of opposition members.

Outside the building, however, there is drama.

A police team led by Ipoh OCCI Anthony Glenn has been accused of blocking the Pakatan reps from entering the House several times and of roughing up some of them

Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin told reporters that they were blocked even before they could take the lift.



Sivakumar claimed that the police had grabbed his songkok, but did not succeed in taking away his robe.

The reps re-entered the building after the press conference, but Sivakumar re-emerged with Jalong rep Leong Mee Meng - this time, he was not wearing the robe.

"They grabed my robe and beat up a few reps inside the building" he claimed. Nga Kor Ming alleges Chief Inspector Khairul hit his genitals.Sivakumar came out for less than a minute alleging that the police manhandled him and removed the speaker’s robes he was wearing. He went back in after claiming that several Pakatan assemblymen were also manhandled by police.


FRU instructs media and public to get behind police line 50m away. Eight PAS members led by Ustaz Azli Musa pray outside DAP headquarters located opposite the SUK building.

Ganesan began with announcements, stressing the ban on the use of visual recording devices and mobile phones in the House. The SAA are authorised to confiscate these.

He said the number of SAA has been increased - at least 22 are in the House - to prevent a repeat of the ruckus on May 7.

cheers.

24 October 2009

Sampai bila Pakatan Rakyat nak berpakat........

Seperkara yang perlu diingat bahawa tsunami politik dalam PRU 2008 yang membolehkan Pakatan Rakyat(PR) mengambilalih kuasa di 5 buah negeri di Semenanjung Malaysia berlaku secara tiba-tiba dan dengan tidak di sangka-sangka. Ramai rakyat akur bahawa UMNO/BN akan kalah tetapi tidaklah seteruk itu.

Perubahan yang berlaku secara mendadak itu adalah kerana rakyat sudah bosan dengan 50 tahun pemerintahan UMNO/BN yang semakin sombong dan kejam. Lantaran itu, rakyat telah membuat keputusan untuk beralih angin kepada pihak pembangkang. Bukan kerana rakyat suka dan inginkan parti pembangkang, tetapi kerana situasi semasa yang banyak membangk
itkan kemarahan rakyat terhadap gomen UMNO/BN dan ini menyebabkan rakyat memilih perubahan.

Dalam kebangkitan rakyat itu, Anwar Ibrahim muncul sebagai idola untuk masyarakat berbilang kaum ini bersatu dengan harapan akan wujud satu tampuk pemerintahan yang baru. Namun kemaraan pembangkang ke Putrajaya terhenti beberapa kilometer saja dari pusat pemerintahan tersebut.

Banyak telah berlaku sejak March 2008 hingga sekarang. Masihkah rakyat membenci UMNO/BN? Beberapa pilihanraya kecil yang diadakan menunjukkan bahawa api kemarahan rakyat terhadap gomen UMNO/BN masih belum padam. Tapi, apakah PR hanya perlu berpaut kepada emosi rakyat semata-mata mahu berkuasa?

Umum tahu bahawa siapa saja mahu memerintah di negara ini perlu sokongan orang-orang Melayu dan PR hendaklah berusaha sehabis-habis untuk meraih sokongan itu. UMNO seperti biasa berlagak bahawa mereka adalah pembela masyarakat orang Melayu. Kalau betul cakap UMNO itu kenapakah ramai orang Melayu masih merempat dalam kemiskinan di kampung dan desa? Kenapa ramai lulusan sekolah dan IPT masih berkeliaran tanpa pekerjaan?

Ingat, PR buka
nlah sebuah parti tapi hanya satu pakatan yang longgar parti-parti pembangkang yang cuba tidur sekatil tapi mempunyai mimpi berbeza-beza. Sudah tiba masanya,PR ini wujud sebagai satu entiti dengan identitinya sendiri.

Tapi sampai bilakah rakyat yang memberikan mandat kepada PR itu harus menanti? Hanya Sdr. Anwar Ibrahim,Tuan Hj.Hadi Awang dan Sdr.Lim Kit Siang tahu jawapannya.

Apakah PR begitu selesa setakat nak jadi pembangkang semata-mata?

Over to you Pakatan Rakyat...........

Baca di sini.


Berikut diperturunkan tulisan Sdr.Lim Hong Siang,bertajuk "Bolehkah PR bentuk kerajaan tanpa sokongan majoriti Melayu?" untuk renungan bersama...........

Bolehkah Pakatan Rakyat membentuk kerajaan yang halal dan absah (berlegitimasi), seandainya gagal memperolehi sokongan lebih 50% daripada masyarakat Melayu, tetapi sokongan masyarakat kaum lain memberikan bilangan kerusi yang mencukupi di Dewan Rakyat untuk PR memerintah di peringkat pusat?

"PR mungkin terasa serba salah dengan kesahihan kerajaannya seandainya ia memperolehi kurang 50% daripada sokongan masyarakat Melayu, walaupun mendapat mandat lebih 50% daripada seluruh masyarakat Malaysia."

Demikianlah pemerhatian dan persoalanan yang dilontarkan oleh pengkaji politik, Wong Chin Huat selepas kekalahan PR di PRK Bagan Pinang pada 11 Oktober yang lalu. Wong mengemukakan statistik bahawa wujudnya kecenderungan pengaliran undi masyarakat India kepada BN dalam PRK tersebut, yang boleh dijelaskan sama ada Bagan Pinang ialah "kes terasing" atau "menggambarkan trend keseluruhannya (khususnya masyarakat India)".

Seandainya 40% undi Melayu diperolehi...

Perhitungan kasar Wong berdasarkan 165 kerusi parlimen di Semenanjung menunjukkan, seandainya PR memperolehi 40% undi Melayu dan 75% undi bukan Melayu, maka PR akan memperolehi 103 kerusi, dan hanya memerlukan 9 kerusi daripada Sabah dan Sarawak untuk menubuhkan kerajaan persekutuan (dengan 112 daripada 222 kerusi). Seandainya PR memperolehi 50% undi kaum India dan 75% undi kaum Cina, dalam keadaan mengekalkan undi Melayu pada paras 40%, maka PR akan memperolehi 90 kerusi di Semenanjung. Jikalau undi kaum India jatuh kepada 40%, maka PR hanya akan mendapat 80 kerusi, seperti apa yang berlaku pada PRU ke-12.

Pemerhatian Wong
terhadap senario politik selepas PRU ke-12, termasuk beberapa PRK seperti Bukit Gantang, Manek Urai yang menyaksikan peralihan sokongan sebahagian masyarakat Melayu kepada BN, menyimpulkan bahawa "mustahil untuk PR memperolehi lebih 50% sokongan Melayu dalam masa terdekat." Maka, Wong mencadangkan agar PR menggariskan matlamat yang lebih realistik, iaitu mengekalkan undi Melayu sekurang-kurangnya pada paras 40%, di samping melonjakkan graf sokongan masyarakat bukan Melayu kepada 75%, seandainya ingin mengambil alih kuasa kerajaan persekutuan pada PRU ke-13.

Untuk Wong, selagi PR terasa serba salah jikalau gagal memperolehi lebih 50% undi daripada masyarakat Melayu, maka UMNO dan lidahnya, Utusan Malaysia akan diberi kesempatan untuk meneruskan serangannya.

Seandainya Pakatan Rakyat meretak...

Logik Wong begini. Seandainya PR terus dihantui bayangannya "untuk mendapat sokongan lebih 50% Melayu", maka parti komponen PR, terutamanya PAS dan PKR dijangka akan beralih kepada hujah mahupun dasar yang menampakkan perkauman dan keagamaannya sekali-kala, sekiranya tidak tahan dengan serangan UMNO dan Utusan Malaysia.

Lantaran itu, PAS dan PKR akan bertelagah dengan DAP yang perlu tampil untuk menyanggah hujah dan dasar tersebut. Apa yang berlaku seterusnya adalah pengundi bandar, kelas menengah akan hilang yakin kepada PR kerana "harapan (yang diberikan PR)" kini diganti dengan persepsi "sering berbalah sesama sendiri". Senario ini berakhir dengan retaknya PR seperti Barisan Alternatif sebelumnya... Untuk mengelakkan ramalan pesimis ini menjadi kenyataan, Wong menganjurkan pandangan bahawa PR perlu yakin bahawa dirinya tetap kerajaan yang absah seandai
nya mendapat mandat lebih 50% undi daripada masyarakat Malaysia secara keseluruhannya.

Sistem negara yang dikuasai Melayu...

Ketika mengulas pandangan yang diutarakan Wong Chin Huat, Yong Kai Ping (Editor Malaysiakini, edisi bahasa Cina) berkata, "legitimasi sesebuah kerajaan dalam masyarakat Melayu" merupakan "persoalan struktur" yang perlu dihadapi bukan sahaja PR, tetapi mana-mana pa
rti politik yang bercita-cita untuk menerajui pucuk pimpinan kerajaan di negara ini. Yong menjelaskan bahawa setelah berpuluh tahun BN memerintah, sistem negara ini telah diubahsuai kepada satu sistem "negara Melayu", di mana sektor perkhidmatan awam dan pasukan keselamatan, termasuk tentera dan polis telah dikuasai sepenuhnya kaum Melayu.

Justeru itu,
Yong berpendapat bahawa PR tidak dapat mengelakkan dirinya ketika berdepan dengan persoalan ini, dan terpaksa mencari jalan penyelesaian untuk mengatasi masalah ini. Yong menganggap bahawa PR masih belum menemui jalan keluar, ketika berhadapan dengan serangan retorik UMNO bahawa "naiknya PR bermaksud hilangnya kuasa Melayu".

"Sememanganya, PR tidak akan dapat menandingi UMNO ketika membincangkan Melay
u. Namun, apakah hujah sebaliknya yang diketengahkan untuk membalas retorik UMNO? Satu hujah yang senang difahami, berkesan untuk memujuk dan mendapat keyakinan masyarakat Melayu...," kata Yong.

Misalnya, "Melayu" dipisahkan kepada Melayu-Bandar, Melayu-Kelas Menengah dan sebagainya, agar kepentingan Melayu ini dapat dihalusi dan dibincangkan secara konkrit, cadang Yong.

Malah, Yong menganggap "politik berbilang kaum" yang dianjurkan PR ini perlu didalami, dan bukan hanya berpuas hati dengan aktiviti seperti rumah terbuka sahaja. Beliau mencadangkan agar pemimpin PR perlu berdialog dengan sektor perkhidmatan awam, pasukan keselamatan, untu
k menghapuskan rasa musuh dan syak wasangka yang wujud. Apabila tembok ini dipecahkan, barulah PR boleh tampil dan mendakwa dirinya sebagai pakatan politik yang melambangkan kepentingan semua kelas dalam masyarakat Malaysia, simpul Yong. - Lim Hong Siang

(*Perbincangan ini mengambil tempat di Dewan Perhimpunan Cina KL-Selangor, pada 13 Oktober 2009, dalam satu forum yang bertajukkan PRK Bagan Pinang.)

source:merdekareview

cheers.


23 October 2009

In 1Malaysia challenging legislative proceedings in court - not OK for gomen but OK for opposition....

The High Court said that it has no right to interfere in the business done in parliament. The High Court ruled today that legislative proceedings cannot be challenged in court, in a decision which appears to go against an earlier Federal Court ruling. The Court ruled that the constitution was supreme and that it cannot question proceedings of the Dewan Rakyat.

But in April 2009, the Federal Court panel of Augustine Paul, Alauddin Mohd Sheriff, Arifin Zakaria, Nik Hashim Nik Ab. Rahman, and Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin was willing to depart from this precedent, which gives respect to the doctrine of separation of powers in a case between ousted Perak Speaker V Sivakumar and Barisan Nasional assemblymen in Perak.

In that case the Federal Court ruled Sivakumar did not have the power to suspend Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir, the MB, and six BN executive council members from attending the state assembly.

In the case of Gobind Singh Deo today, the High Court appeared to be returning to that doctrine.

When it comes to Perak Dewan Undangan Negeri, it can over rule what transpired in it.

source:malaysia insider

The Appeal Court ruling was indeed to clear the way for the seven UMNO Adun to attend the state assembly and head off attempts to mount a no-confidence vote against the Perak BN gomen. In other words, the court then acted such, in order to legalise an illegal BN gomen.

Adooooh.........pusing kepala aku, yang mana satu ba? Najib cakap 1Malaysia, tapi pasal apa dalam hal mahkamah dan undang ada dua set undang-undang diguna pakai...1 untuk gomen....1 untuk pembangkang?

Apabila hakim memberi hakiman sebegini,sekejap ini,sekejap itu...sapa lagi yang nak percaya kepada badan kehakiman negara? Mungkin lembu dan monyet dalam hutan kot.......


cheers.

22 October 2009

Tian Chua,MP Batu - 6 month jail and RM3,000 fine.......

When you are caught and been carried away like a bag of rice,what will you do.....struggle...... so did Tian Chua,the MP for Batu. Today he was fined RM3,000 and jailed six months after being found guilty of biting a police constable and preventing the latter from discharging his duty. Magistrate Mohd Faizi Che Abu found Chua not to be a credible witness as his defence was a mere denial.

"Even a video recording submitted by the defence showed he had resisted arrest.

"Although the video recording did not show the biting, I believe it did as the policeman had testified that he had punched the accused and Chua had retaliated by biting," said the magistrate.

"I find the policeman's credibility intact as he did admit when testifying at the prosecution stage that he punched Tian Chua," said the magistrate.

Tian Chua committed the offence during a Bersih gathering to protest against constitutional amendments extending the retirement age of Election Commission members from 65 to 66.

If upheld, the sentence would disqualify Tian Chua from holding the MP's post. Another prk in the making?

Tian Chua said he did not think it was a fair judgment as the magistrate and prosecution relied on the evidence of the police constable and based it on circumstantial evidence.

"It did not prove that the biting took place," added the Batu MP.

Chua also believes that the sentence was 'designed' to disqualify him as a parliamentarian.

"I still maintain my innocence. I would continue to render my service to the people," he said, adding that the sentence would not deter his agenda for change and reform.

source:malaysiakini

Wow, another episode from drama minggu ini, when the judge playing the villain role. Come on judge, when someone punch you and your hands and legs are being held, biting will be the last resort and thats........self defence........

cheers.

'Teoh's death 80% homicide' says Thai forensic expert.........

A Thai pathology expert told an inquest today that there was an 80% probability that Teoh Beng Hock's death was a homicide.

"From everything I have read and considered, there is only a 20% likelihood that his death was a suicide. The remaining possibility is that it was a homicide," Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand said.

Pornthip, the director-general of the Thai Ministry of Justice's Central Institute of Forensic Science, also said it was possible Teoh was unconscious when he fell to his death.

Teoh, the political secretary to Selangor executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah, had been summoned to the Selangor Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) offices on the 14th floor of Plaza Masalam to be questioned over irregularities in the disbursement of state funds on July 15. He was found dead on the fifth floor service corridor of the building the next day.

Pornthip said during questioning by counsel Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, for the Selangor government, that Teoh could have been strangled unconscious before his fall, or he could have blacked out from the pain caused by other injuries inflicted on him before the fall.

"(Teoh's unconsciousness) could have possibly come from manual strangulation and, secondly, from the pain from the gluteal region from the buttocks," Pornthip, the Selangor government's expert witness, said.

In an earlier Power Point presentation, she had testified there were several injuries found on Teoh which were inconsistent with a fall from a height. They were:

- the anal injuries, which were of a "penetrating" nature;

- evidence of "handle bruises" which indicate physical strangulation on Teoh's neck; and

- the fracture found on Teoh's skull was more consistent with that of a blunt force impact than transverse force from the fall.

Asked about the fracture, Pornthip said her testimony differed from that of the two pathologists who performed the post-mortem on Teoh as a fracture caused by a transfer of force would appear differently on the skull.

"From the opinion of the doctors, they said that this fracture might have been caused by transferred force from the feet during landing on the ground," she said.

"But I found contusion over the fracture line. So the fracture was caused by blunt force injury directly on the skull. And for the transfer force of fall from height, there would just be a ring fracture."

In their post-mortem reports, pathologists Dr Khairul Ibrahim and Dr Prashant Samberkar concluded that the fracture on Teoh's skull came from the fall. Asked by Malik about the scratches found on Teoh's right shoe, Pornthip said the marks "looked as if Teoh had been dragged".

"In normal cases of a fall from a height, the shoes would not have left an abrasion mark like this," she said.

However, she said, such an abrasion would have been caused by a "hard and rough" surface, which Pornthip's team did not find on the 14th floor during their inspection in August.

During questioning by Tan Hock Chuan, who is assisting coroner Azmil Munthapha Abas, she admitted that on closer inspection of the original photos it appeared if the scratch marks were formed when Teoh impacted the fifth floor walkway.

Pornthip also said she was at a "distinct disadvantage" in conducting her examination as she was unable to perform a post-mortem on Teoh as his family did not want her to.

She said she did not consult either Prashant or Khairul or receive all of the DNA or toxicology reports prepared by Dr Seah Lay Hong of the Chemistry Department.

However, she maintained that she was able to conduct a satisfactory analysis based on the photos and reports supplied to her, as she was not at a "100% disadvantage".

Asked about defensive wounds, Pornthip said such wounds would depend on the weapon used. "If there is a weapon, we should be able to find defensive wounds," she said.

Pornthip also disputed Prashant's earlier analysis that Teoh was not asphyxiated as there was no tongue-biting found on Teoh.

"Tongue bite means that there was protrusion of the tongue because of the obstruction of the trachea, and in a manual strangulation, the hand cannot compress the trachea. The absence of a tongue bite means nothing," she said.

Questioned by Gobind Singh Deo, counsel for the Teoh family, Pornthip said she would be willing to do a second post-mortem on Teoh's body if it was exhumed, despite it being three months since his death.

"Despite the limitations, doing a second post-mortem would not put me at a disadvantage. I can still conduct a post-mortem on the body," she said. The inquest continues on Nov 9.

source:theSun

Read here.

Can our court admit statements by the foreign forensic expert? Remember,this is UMNO's court and UMNO need MACC to do their dirty job for them.

Pokoknya, MACC, Police, pata doktor dari Klang and UHKL sama bersubahat untuk menutup kes TBH ini bagi pihak MACC dan gomen.

By the end of the day,the court will say......"kerana bukti tak cukup,maka semua pegawai MACC yang dipersoalkan adalah bebas daripada segala tuduhan, bagi mendiang TBH, dia mati kerana membunuh diri".

Are you not ashamed of our kangaroo court...............

cheers.

16 October 2009

Happy Diwali..........


to all Malaysian Indians & take care....

Diwali Nal Valthukal.........


while I am.......



taking a break & be back soon.........


cheers.

15 October 2009

Lebih baik Khairy cermin dirinya sendiri dulu...........

Pemuda Umno berikrar akan sedaya-upaya menghalang kemaraan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, yang disifatkan sebagai "sesumpah lidah bercabang", menjejakkan kakinya di pejabat perdana menteri di Putrajaya.

"Mungkin Anwar telah berjaya dengan helahnya terhadap sebahagian generasi muda yang tidak pernah kenal siapa Anwar yang sebenar – seorang chameleon politik, sesumpah yang berubah warna mengikut musim dan ketika melompat dari pohon ke pohon; makhluk pelbagai alam.

"Tetapi Umno dan Pemuda Umno ingat sejarah sebenar Anwar, dan kami akan memastikan Penglipurlara Lidah Bercabang Dua ini tidak akan sekali-kali sampai ke Putrajaya," kata ketua pergerakan itu Khairy Jamaluddin di persidangan agung Pemuda Umno 2009 hari ini.

source:malaysiakini

Wow!!! hebat betul si Anwar Ibrahim, hinggakan UMNO kecut teloq bila sebut saja namanya.

Apakah si penyamun Oxford ini mampu sampai Putrajaya lebih awal daripada Anwar? Itulah yang patut ditanya oleh semua perwakilan Pemuda UMNO yang ada itu.

Sedangkan jangka tempoh menjadi ketua Pemuda UMNO pun belum tentu sama ada sampai sepenggal, kerana ada ramai buaya lain sedang menunggu untuk mencantasnya.

Cadangan aku, bukankah lebih baik si budak Khairy ini berdiri di depan cermin dan nilai kedudukan dirinya sendiri sebelum menegur orang lain. Sekadar menyalak dihadapan anak-anak lembu pawah yang asyik bertepuk ramai-ramai tiada ertinya............

cheers.

14 October 2009

UMNO tak akan berubah,samun menyamun tetap 1agenda depa.......

Najib Razak berkata sudah sampai masanya Umno menjadi parti utama yang menjaga kebajikan dan kesejahteraan bukan sahaja orang Melayu dan bumiputera tetapi rakyat Malaysia keseluruhannya.

Perdana Menteri berkata dalam mewakili kepentingan orang Melayu dan bumiputera, Umno hendaklah berubah mengikut keadaan semasa dengan memainkan peranan sebagai parti utama yang turut memelihara kepentingan kaum lain.

source:mStar

Ini cerita lama Najib ooi.....presiden UMNO,termasuk bapa engkau sebelum ini dah bagi ingatan kepada UMNO, tapi macam biasalah,bila persidangan UMNO hanya merupakan gelanggang bertepuk ramai-ramai, apa saja nasihat dan amanat sekadar masuk telinga kanan keluar telinga kiri.

Pesta samun menyamun,balun membalun dikalangan gerombolan penyanggak UMNO,kroni,anak bini tetap diteruskan agendanya.

Hari ini ketua penyamun menyeru agar UMNO dijadikan tunggak utama menentukan kesejahteraan bukan saja untuk orang Melayu tapi termasuk kaum Cina dan India. Wow, cakap punya hebat 1Malaysia konon.....ptuihhhhhh!!

Kalau pembangkang yang buat kenyataan begini, pembodek UMNO akan sikit punya melenting....'mana boleh Ketuanan Melayu perlu dahulukan kata depa'..... nak tengok apa Shamuddin,Ibrahim Ali dan hero-hero ketuanan Melayu nak komen(kalau ada teloq).........

cheers.

13 October 2009

Its OK for JJ to be with Paul Wolfowitz...........

Paul Wolfowitz, one of America’s foremost hawks against Iraq.He was the chief architect of the US invasion of Iraq, purportedly to seize its oil assets. Thus, positioning America in that oil-rich region to dominate and control the area for the American strategic interests.

It was wrong for Anwar to be friendly with Paul Wolfwitz says UMNO and her band of 'penyamun'. For this the UMNO 'penyamun' brands Anwar as agent of America and a traitor to the Malays.



But, its OK if it an UMNO guy.......look below who is with Paul Wolfwitz now.....oops our new Ambassador to US, the "raba-raba" MP from Rompin, is already sleeping with the enemy.

Helloooooo.......'penyamun-penyamun' UMNO what say you now? agen Amerika atau pengkhianat bangsa Melayu?




This guy had allegedly fondled a woman backside sometime back. The woman lodged a police report and later made a statutory declaration to cancel the police report. For his bravery he was appointed 1Malaysia's Ambassador to the USA.

Cakap tak serupa bikin...........

cheers.

12 October 2009

Bagan Pinang - yang menang Isa Samad bukan UMNO.........

Isa Samad menang besar di Bagan Pinang, walaupun rata-rata orang tahu dirinya terpalit dengan amalan rasuah dan salahguna kuasa. Sebenarnya, yang menang itu Isa Samad bukannya UMNO. Tidak semestinya jika UMNO letak calon lain daripada Isa Samad, UMNO boleh menang besar.

Personaliti Isa Samad yang menolong UMNO meraih kemenangan besar tersebut.Mungkin kerana Isa Samad sudah lama jadi MB di negeri tersebut dan popularitinya masih tidak luntor. Dalam hal ini rakyat tidak kisah apa kesalahan Isa Samad,sama ada dia penyamun atau perasuah itu semua tak jadi hal,hakikatnya, dia adalah Isa Samad dan perlu diberikan sokongan.

Seperti biasa dengan bantuan projek mee segera yang tumbuh seperti cendawan di Bagan Pinang,serta janji-janji manis tentang berbagai-bagai projek yang akan dilaksanakan nanti sudah tentu menjadi umpan bagi menarik undi rakyat. Ini tidak termasuk, wang ringgit serta 'hand-out' yang diberi sebagai ang pow aidil fitri dan diwali,sudah tentu amat menawan hati. Jangan lupa pula undi pos pasukan keselamatan yang sedia menjadi 'fixed deposit' kemenangan mana-mana calon UMNO yang dipacak di situ.

UMNO boleh bangga dengan kemenangan besar Isa Samad.Tetapi, adakah kemenangan besar UMNO itu boleh diterjemahkan kepada, bahawa rakyat jelata sudah berpatah balik kepada BN/UMNO? Apa yang pelik bila UMNO/BN tewas dalam beberapa siri PRK,tukang komen UMNO/BN hanya menyepikan diri. Bila dapat kemenangan besar sikit punya sakan dikomennya.Pokoknya banyak faktor wajar diambilkira, yang menyaksikan kemenangan UMNO ini sebenarnya dan ini tidak semestinya satu indikator UMNO sudah dapat sokongan.

Sekiranya,UMNO/BN betul-betul mahu menguji sama ada rakyat jelata sudah kembali kepada UMNO, adakan pilihanraya semula di negeri Perak,negeri yang DUNnya sudah menjadi cacar marba. Rakyat pun dah keliru siapakah MB sebenarnya?

Najib, di situlah gelanggang untuk menguji sama ada rakyat sudah menerima1Malaysia,1UMNO awak...........

What comes after Bagan Pinang? read here.



cheers.

11 October 2009

N31-Bagan Pinang - Yes to Isa............


BN's Mohd Isa Abdul Samad scored a landslide victory to retain the Bagan Pinang state seat by a 5,435 vote majority.

Mohd Isa secured 8,013 votes against PAS candidate Zulkefly Mohammad Omar's 2,578 votes. There were 223 spoilt votes in total, with 356 unreturned ballot papers.

The voter turnout was 81.65% or 11,170 of the 13,664 voters in Bagan Pinang, including 4,604 postal voters.

Mohd Isa’s win marks BN’s first victory in seven by-elections since the March 2008 general election.

His margin of victory was significantly greater than 2,333 vote majority obtained by BN's Azman Mohd Nor in the 2008 general election.

source:malaysian insider

Tahniah kepada yang menang. Ramalan ayah pin sudah tersasar. UMNO pesta sakan malam ini. Isa juga harus beterima kasih kepada tentera atas sumbangan undi pos bagi kemenangannya.

There's always another place, another time. Nothing is lost.

cheers.

N31-Bagan Pinang - Sesal dulu berpendapatan, Undilah PAS.....





Sekurang-kurangnya MCA ada keterbukaan bila ahli-ahlinya terus reject Presidennya(Ong Tee Keat) dan Timbalan Presidennya(Chua Sooi Lek) dalam undian EGM. Tahap pemikiran ahli-ahlinya matang dan tahu membeda di antara pemimpin jenis penyamun,perasuah dengan pemimpin yang bersih dan ikhlas.

Apakah UMNO sanggup lakukan seperti mana MCA buat? sorrylah.......Jika dibandingan,tahap pemikiran orang Melayu UMNO, dengan orang Cina MCA ibarat langit dengan bumi. UMNO, kalau boleh akan pertahankan siperasuah, habis-habisan....sepertilah calon UMNO, ISA SAMAD itu.....

To all Malaysian Indian voters of Bagan Pinang please give us and yourself a Deepavali gift by not voting Isa Samad......... he is, as Mahathir said,"BAD CHOICE"













Sekiranya Isa Samad menang, dia patut berterima kasih kepada angkatan tentera dan polis yang menyumbangkan lebih daripada 4,000 undi. Namun semalam Ayah Pin daripada kerajaan langit memberi ramalan bahawa calon yang akan menang di Bagan Pinang hanya dengan majority 555 undi saja. Kepada pengundi-pengundi di Bagan Pinang, undilah dengan bijak.

Moga-moga ramalan si ayah pin akan memihak kepada PAS.........

cheers.

10 October 2009

N31-Bagan Pinang - Pilih Isa Samad sama seperti merestui rasuah.........

Tinggal 24 jam lagi untuk rakyat membuat perhitungan, sama ada memilih Zulkefly Mohamad Omar yang dikenali sebagai peribadi yang bersih. Atau memilih seorang bekas Menteri Besar selama 22 tahun yang dipalitkan dengan pelbagai tuduhan rasuah dan salah penyalahgunaan kuasa.

Berikut adalah beberapa pendedahan yang telahpun dilakukan oleh PAS dan Pakatan Rakyat, tetapi langsung tidak dijawab oleh calon rasuah Mohd Isa Samad.....

1. 6 tahun penaiktarafan jalan utama Telok Kemang - Pasir Panjang sepanjang 24km terbengkalai.

2. Perparitan dan sistem kumbahan yang gagal berfungsi dengan baik mengakibatkan banjir serta bau busuk, terutama selepas musim hujan.

3. Projek pembangunan terbengkalai, menjadi sarang penagihan.

4. SWM yang gagal mengutip sampah mengikut jadual menjadikan Masalah sampah-sarap dan bau busuk.

5. Bandar Pembiakan Lalat dan nyamuk.

6. Sebanyak lebih 20 ekar Tanah Rizab Melayu telah dijualkan kepada beberapa hotel pada era Tan Sri Isa Samad menjadi Menteri Besar Besar.

7. Taman Intan Perdana adalah Tanah wakaf yang dicadangkan menjadi kawasan perkuburan Islam telah dijual kepada pemaju secara haram.

Ketujuh-tujuh dakwaan tersebut sudah mejadi rahsia umum calon PAS Tan Sri Mohd Isa Abdul Saad.

Ketujuh-tujuh pendedahan tersebut menjadikan Isa senantiasa dalam sindrom kemaafan, walaupun Umno sedaya upaya cuba mengangkat calon pertaruhan mereka juga.

source:buletin online







cheers.

09 October 2009

N31 Bagan Pinang - Help 25 million Malaysian to send the right message to UMNO/BN.....


This is part of an opinion by Tohkong Mosjid that was posted in my mail and wish to share with you and Bagan Pinang voters......

Your votes affect 25 million Malaysians!

Yes, Bagan Pinang is just a small DUN in a not very well developed Negeri Sembilan state. But no doubt, the implication of this election result is the most significant compared to the 7 other by-elections before this. Let me share with you why.

a. If BN wins, how will they interpret the cow-head incident? If they win in BP, are we indirectly sending the signal that this act can be repeated?

b. If BN wins, how will they interpret the rakyat's anger in extending the IGP's contract for another year? If they win in BP, are we indirectly sending the signal that our IGP had done a fabulous job thus far?

c. If BN wins, how will MACC interpret the rakyat's anger in Teoh Beng Hock's death? If they win in BP, are we indirectly sending the signal that it is not that big a deal when a witness died under their custody?

d. If BN wins, how will they interpret the rakyat's anger in the way they abused the laws and constitution in Perak's power grab? If they win in BP, are we indirectly sending the signal that Perak's takeover was legitimate, and it was within their right to do so?

e. If BN wins, how will they interpret the rakyat's anger in their racist statements and policies as portrayed by their newspapers? If they win in BP, are we indirectly sending the signal, that we are ok with their racist political game as long as our roads are built?

f. If BN wins, how will they interpret the rakyat's despise on the massive corruption going on in the country? If they win in BP, are we indirectly sending the message that we don't care how corrupt they are presently or previously, as long as our needs in the constitutions are promised to be fulfilled?

g. If BN wins, how will they interpret the death of Kugan in custody and the ridiculous AG's decision of prosecuting only one policemen for causing grievous injury (not death, mind you!)? If they win in BP, are we indirectly sending the signal that we are generally ok with what the police did to Kugan while letting AG to ridicule us with such lame prosecution? If not for Bagan Pinang's election, do you honestly think that the policemen is going to be hauled to court?I can go on and on, but I will stop at...(g). Yes, this election's result affects not only the 14,000+ people in Bagan Pinang; the reality is, this election result has a very deep impact to the whole country if BN wins.

A PAS win here is the trigger point that UMNO desperately need to realise that, it is time for them to reform from within and stop playing racial politics while getting serious in winning back our support or else they will suffer our wrath comes next general election.

Again, Dear Bagan Pinang voters, can you help 25,000,000 Malaysian to send the correct message to BN, our government of the day, that we are unhappy with their way of governing and we really want them to buck up for the sake of the nation?


What was Isa Samad's real intention?

Have you asked yourself, did UMNO choose him on merit, or UMNO choose him due to pressure? It was because the Negeri Sembilan's UMNO grassroots wanted him that badly, or Isa himself wanted the seat so badly that he asked his grassroots to pressure for it? If Isa said something like this to the grassroots: "I'm a semi-retired man. Let's nominate someone else and give them a chance, I'll fully support whoever you choose," to his supporters, do you think his supporters would not have nominated someone else if they were given a green light?

How many UMNO people in Bagan Pinang has a personal agenda (vying for contracts, powers or money) by supporting Isa's candidacy? Was Isa nominated because he was the best guy for Bagan Pinang or he was the best guy for his supporters to get back on the gravy train? Was it about you, the normal citizens of Bagan Pinang, or was it about them?


Treat BN as your spoilt child

Permatang Pasir's voters had rejected a tainted candidate, because they wanted someone clean to represent them. In our heart, all of us are wishing for a batch of clean and new faces in our government to replace those useless old faces who speak more nonsenses as the day gone by.

If you are going to vote for Isa, you are basically going against your own wish. Our generation is suffering under this BN government because of our endless support for the past 50 years without check and balance; we pampered them too much. Our children and grandchildren are going to suffer if BN does not change its attitude any time soon.

Let's not make it worse by voting for them this time. A BN's lost here is good for the country. We need to seriously wake them up from their sweet and wet dream to revamp and reform to be a better and responsible government NOW! Treat BN as your spoilt child. Assuming that you have tried to reason with them numerous times previously, and it has failed to work. Now, how can you discipline your spoilt child? By giving them more sweets? Or by biting the bullet to let them suffer some hardships? Think about it before you cast your votes.


Last but not least

Dear Bagan Pinang voters,

No matter what I wrote above, in the end, it is still your call on who you should vote for. But please remember your votes do have a massive effect on the future of our beloved country. Think about our country, our next generation and our current government's attitude before you decide who to vote for. Put country first before your constituency. Isa Samad may be good for Bagan Pinang, but is he a good choice for 25,000,000 Malaysians who are still living under BN's government?




cheers.

Najib 1Malaysia....1 kampung 2 JKKK, 1 negara 2 undang-undang....

video

Akta Kemajuan Petroleum 1974 menyatakan:

Suatu Akta untuk membuat peruntukan bagi pengeksplorasian dan pengeksploitasian petroleum sama ada di pantai atau di luar pantai oleh suatu Perbadanan yang padanya akan diletakhakkan seluruh pemunyaan dan hak, kuasa, kebebasan dan keistimewaan eksklusif berkenaan dengan petroleum tersebut, dan untuk mengawal penjalanan aktiviti penggunaan dan pemajuan yang berhubungan dengan petroleum dan keluarannya; bagi membuat peruntukan mengenai penubuhan suatu Perbadanan di bawah Akta Syarikat 1965 [Akta 125] atau di bawah undang-undang yang berhubungan dengan pemerbadanan syarikat dan mengenai kuasa Perbadanan itu; dan bagi membuat peruntukan mengenai perkara yang berkaitan atau bersampingan dengannya.

Untuk tujuan ini, sebuah syarikat minyak nasional ditubuhkan, iaitu Petroleum Nasional Berhad ataupun Petronas. Sebagai imbalannya, Petronas akan membayar peratusan dari pendapatan minyak kepada negeri-negeri yang berkenaan, seperti yang termaktub dalam Seksyen 4 Akta Kemajuan Petroleum 1974, iaitu:

Sebagai balasan bagi pemunyaan dan hak, kuasa, kebebasan dan keistimewaan yang diletakhakkan padanya menurut Akta ini, Perbadanan itu hendaklah membuat apa-apa pembayaran wang tunai sebagaimana yang dipersetujui antara pihak-pihak yang berkenaan kepada Kerajaan Persekutuan dan Kerajaan mana-mana Negeri yang berkenaan.

Pada tahun 1976, perjanjian ditandatangani antara Petronas dan SEMUA negeri di Malaysia. Orang yang menyusun Perjanjian ini adalah Peguam Cara Negara pada masa itu, iaitu Tun Salleh Abas. Perjanjian ini menyatakan bahawa setiap dan semua negeri di mana petroleum dijumpai akan dibayar 5% dari pendapatan dan pendapatan ini dipanggil ROYALTI. Semenjak itu, Terengganu, Sabah dan Sarawak menikmati ROYALTI 5% dari Petronas.

source:malaysia today/malaysiakini

Mengapa bagi Terengganu dan Kelantan royalti minyak ini ditukar kepada wang ehsan? Pemberian wang ehsan pula bukan dibuat terus kepada kerajaan negeri tapi kepada ketua-ketua bahagian UMNO kononnya untuk pembangunan masyarakat.

Inilah yang amat mengherankan, bukankah Najib melaungkan 1Malaysia, tapi kenapa bila nak bayar royalti minyak ini ada 2 cara, royalti bagi negeri-negeri bawah takbir UMNO/BN dan wang ehsan bagi negeri di bawah tadbir pembangkang,kecuali Terengganu di mana amalan pemberian wang ehsan diteruskan kerana UMNO takut pada masa akan datang Terengganu mungkin jatuh ke tangan pembangkang.

Bercakap pasai Najib 1Malaysia lagi...kenapa satu kampung ada 2 JKKK, satu negeri ada 2 MB, 2 speaker(Perak), satu negara 2 jenis undang-undang.............

cheers.

08 October 2009

N31-Bagan Pinang - 253 non-local postal voters......

253 postal voters in Bagan Pinang are found to be voters in other places outside Bagan Pinang as well, claimed PAS secretary-general Mustafa Ali.

"Their names appeared in the Bagan Pinang electoral roll as well as in other places outside Bagan Pinang," said Mustafa.

"We found out the overlapping list days ago, but it was after the election commission had approved the voters' list," he told a press after a two-hour meeting with Election Commission chairperson Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof.

He added that PAS had originally considered taking out an injunction to prevent the 253 from voting but conceded that it was not practical as postal voting starts tomorrow.

"We will consult our lawyers. Whatever action we take now can affect future by-elections," he said.

The EC admitted the error but was unaware of it when approving the electoral roll, added Mustafa.

PAS may seek a court order to postpone the Bagan Pinang polls in view of alleged irregularities in the postal voting process.

This will be among the matters discussed with the Election Commission during a meeting with a Pakatan Rakyat delegation at its headquarters in Putrajaya this afternoon. The Pakatan delegation will be led by PAS national elections director Abdul Halim Rahman.

source:malaysiakini

This was not a new issue and it has been raised many times with the EC over the past decade, most prominently during the meetings headed by Coalition for Free and Fair Elections (Bersih). But until now, EC has failed to take any action, particularly on the issue of 'overlapping' voter names.

So you see why EC and BN are so reluctant to abolish postal votes. Its a kind of "fixed deposit" for BN/UMNO. In fact, many UMNO leaders won not because they are popular among the rakyat, but the postal votes help them pull thru and that includes Najib Tun Razak.........





NO TO ISA SAMAD


NO TO UMNO/BN



cheers.