
nasi kandaq kedai mamak, anak mami juai pesemboq, lepaih baca jangan dok syiok, kalu-kalu SB jengok kot dapoq...
23 September 2020
Ku Li - Tak perlu layan PAS waktu PRU15 nanti...

21 September 2020
Mana Jemin nak cari port semburit pula ni...
Pilihan Raya Umum (PRU) ke 15 menurut penganalisis politik berkemungkinan besar akan diadakan secara tergempar pada hujung 2020 sekiranya Perikatan Nasional (PN) dan BN berjaya dalam Pilihan Raya Negeri (PRN) Sabah.
Sebaliknya jika kalah, maka PN akan menangguhkan PRU tersebut untuk beberapa lama bagi mengelakkan tsunami Sabah melanda ke Semenanjung. Bagi Ahli Parlimen Tanjung Malim, Chang Lih Kang, pengundi di Sabah mempunyai peluang untuk menyekat politik caca merba dan membazir PN dengan mengalahkan mereka pada 26 September nanti.
"Saya gembira pengundi yang berada di Sabah memberi sokongan kepada Warisan Plus sebab Ketua Menteri Sabah, Shafie Apdal telah membawa perubahan baik semampu mungkin selepas PRU14 lalu. Juga tempoh Warisan berkuasa adalah terlalu singkat (Mei 2018 hingga Julai 2020) dan mandat tersebut wajar diteruskan lagi.
"PRU15 akan diadakan kalau Warisan kalah PRN ini. Oleh itu, semua pengundi Warisan Plus berkemampuan dan akan berjasa besar menyekat PRU15 dilaksanakan dalam masa terdekat (dengan mengalahkan PN-BN)," katanya dipetik. - SR
Sorry Bung, I doubt UMNO will ever change...
At the launch of his coalition's Aku Janji campaign manifesto on Sept 16, Sabah Umno leader Bung Moktar Radin appealed to Sabah voters, “Give us a chance, we have changed”. First, credit to Bung. As the Sabah Umno chairperson and leading his party into the elections for the first time, he has to do what must be done - rally the people behind his party again after they had deserted Umno in GE14.
However, whether Sabahans will heed his earnest, perhaps futile, appeal or not is another matter. Let’s take a closer look and dissect Bung’s plea: "Today, I would also like to explain that Sabah Umno and BN - we have changed. From our leadership, to skills, to our organisation”.
Has the leadership in Umno changed? The president today is Ahmad Zahid Hamidi. Is he someone new or part of the previous kleptocratic regime which was brought to its knees by Malaysians in 2018. Isn’t the party president still facing a slew of charges for corruption and money laundering?
Bung himself became the Sabah Umno chief possibly because there was no one else. He was the only Umno MP left standing after 17 of his party colleagues (all elected representatives) led by Hajiji Noor left Umno to join Bersatu after GE14.
Had they stayed put, I doubt Bung has a ghost of a chance to be chosen as Sabah Umno head. Why? I have no intention to sneer at anyone, so let me leave a hanging statement.
In the old Umno before GE14, I had looked at Mustapa Mohamed and Saifuddin Abdullah favourably. They were the more sane guys (or so I thought) among the many self-serving leaders in Umno. But what did we see in them over the past two years - mere “jelly-fish” politicians without a backbone. Followers they are, with no leadership quality. Mustapa is a disappointment in my book, Saifuddin a bigger one.
There is the triple-jump event in field and track but Saifuddin must have excelled in the quadruple jumps in figure skating. This politician, who badly wanted to be a minister, had since jumped four times – from Umno to PKR, from PKR to being an Azmin Ali’s “bootlicker”, then to PN and finally to Bersatu.
This is what we can surmise about all those with the Umno DNA. They could be in different parties and coalitions today, but one thing is certain - the dreaded Umno DNA stays with them.
Changing skills in Umno? We are aware of what Umno is very skilful at, don’t we? Their leaders abuse power, steal and loot as if there is no tomorrow; they and their family members and cronies enjoy a lavish lifestyle. (Remember the guy who spent more than RM300,000 on a luxurious family holiday and then refused to settle his travel bills.) And shouting at the top of their lungs that they are in power to protect the Malay race and Islam. Even the Malays had awakened and voted them out in 2018.
By the way, who caused this “unnecessary” Sabah elections? Was it not Musa Aman, technically still an Umno member, who dreamed of returning as Sabah chief minister? One of Umno’s infamous skills is still intact - the party’s support for political frogs. Why some of the known "kataks" who attempted the July coup are still being fielded by Umno/BN as candidates?
Umno is still promoting the same rejected BN coalition and worse, now sleeping with its once-upon-a-time enemy, PAS, in their brand-new marriage of convenience. When you are rejected and weak, you will do anything to be on top again. That includes entering a quickie “marriage” and later “divorce” when you no longer need a partner who would soon be considered a burden.
In Sabah, Umno has got entangled in some strange alliances among a motley crew of PN, BN, PBS and others who are fighting each other in more than 10 seats. Is this a new Umno organisation? I don’t think so.
Sorry Bung, come Sept 26, I doubt the people of Sabah will believe that Umno has changed. My gut feeling tells me that Warisan Plus will win the elections by a landslide. I could be wrong, but I wish to be right for the sake of Sabah and Sabahans.
Whatever it may be, the verdict from Sabah voters is likely this: Change from Umno is a long time coming…or it may never dawn at all. Sabahans, being politically mature, will not fall for the sweet words of some known unsavoury Umno characters. And Bung as a potential Sabah chief minister? That has to be the biggest joke to emerge from this election. - Francis Paul Siah,mk

cheers
19 September 2020
Bagaimana Bolehland menjadi BullyLand???...
17 September 2020
Bung Mokhtar sahkan UMNO dulunya penyamun...
Umno dan BN juga, kata Bung Moktar, kini komited menawarkan pentadbiran lebih telus serta menunaikan janjinya kepada rakyat. Pada majlis pelancaran manifesto Aku Janji hari ini, dia juga meminta rakyat Sabah untuk membantu menyelamatkan negeri itu yang didakwanya mengalami penderitaan di bawah Ketua Menteri Mohd Shafie Apdal selama dua tahun.
“Manifesto atau Aku Janji ini telah kita usahakan setelah melihat norma politik baru bukan saja di Semenanjung malah di Sabah. “Kita perlu memberikan tawaran baru kepada rakyat Sabah sebab rakyat Sabah menderita di bawah pemerintahan Warisan selama lebih dua tahun.
“Hari ini juga saya ingin jelaskan bahawa Umno dan BN Sabah, kami telah berubah. Segala bentuk struktur kami, dari kepimpinan, keterampilan, dari cari kami kendalikan organisasi kami," katanya di Kota Kinabalu.
Berubah apa nya... Pegang saja kerajaan.. Berebut jawatan GLC.. Macam tu kata nak berubah kah... Kerja kau org nak merompak.. Menyamun - Illias Amir
Kalau beruk dapat bunga apa akan jadi.....angan2 beruk nak jadi CM...kat parliament x dapat bagi satu idea pun tapi hanya pandai jerit mcm beruk - Augustine Thomas Pereira
Apa yg berubah bung? Lps sorang, sorang tunggu turn naik mahkamah termasuk nko laki bini.. bertambah parah adalah.. - Johari Shamsuddin
Berubah kepala hotak kau lah. Baru bulan lepas korang nak tebuk atap kerajaan negeri. Pembohong, Pencuri, Penyamun, Pemburit semuanya ada dlm kumpulan kamu. Haramkan tangan2 kamu wahai Sabahan dr berikan undi kpd geng2 haram jadah nihh.. Selamatkan Sabah..- Nordin Abu Bakar

Sabah Umno leader Bung Moktar Radin insists that Umno and BN have changed and are committed to a fairer, transparent, and trustworthy administration that will deliver on its promises to the people. At the launch of his coalition's Aku Janji campaign manifesto, he also asked the people to help save Sabah from the 'disaster' that was wrought by Chief Minister Shafie Apdal's two years at the helm.
"We have tried this manifesto Aku Janji after seeing the new political norms not only in the peninsula but also in Sabah. "We need to give something new to the people because the people of Sabah have suffered under the rule of Warisan for more than two years.
"Today, I would also like to explain that Sabah Umno and BN - we have changed. From our leadership, to skills, to our organisation. "Why have we changed? Because we want to capture the hearts of the people and we want to convince the people to support us," said Bung.
"We also want to inform the people of Sabah, that these promises will be delivered 100 percent. "This is our promise. And if we reneged on our words, then this government would only last for a term, or maybe half of that," he said.

Yes, Sabahans will change Bung ini kali. - LimePanda7217
UMNO/BN has changed !!! It's snowing in Sahara desert too. Sabahans, do you want thieves to govern your state?? - David
This rascal is facing Corruption and Criminal Charges in Court and he is asking the Sabahans to give him a chance to govern Sabah for 5 years..Sabahans should tell this corrupted n gangster like rascal,who is famous for using foul languages in Parliament that 5 yrs is just to long to put their future in him.Cheat us once,shame on you and cheat us twice,shame on Sabah Voters - dont just talk
A tiger would never lose its stripes. Bung along with the BN lots have looted Sabah for more than 60 years and asking to be given 5 more years to finish the looting. Sabah, rich with natural resources should have been more developed and its students shouldn’t have to climb trees to get phone signal for exams. Bung should repent and prepare himself to join Najib in Sungai Buloh - harimau_arif
ENOUGH OF YOUR BULLSHIT!!! BUNG... - TS

Take a good look at the three in the photo above - you know all of them. But let not time dim the great travesty that all three of them committed against the rakyat, becoming traitors to the collective will of Malaysians when they lied, cheated, and broke promises to engineer the downfall of a democratically elected government.
On May 9, 2018, a despicable decadent dictatorship headed by Najib Abdul Razak, the son of the second prime minister Abdul Razak Hussein, was overthrown by a motley coalition, Pakatan Harapan, whose leaders inexplicably and unaccountably allowed a previous despot and the master of patronage politics to become interim prime minister.
It was an incredibly bad decision by all in the core coalition of PKR, DAP and Amanah to not only admit Bersatu - a racist party, headed by Dr Mahathir Mohamad - but to allow him to become PM.
When Umno’s 61-year iron grip on the country, which progressively descended into corruption and decline from 1981 onwards after Mahathir became PM, was decisively broken, it was correctly heralded as a victory against authoritarianism, increasing corruption, total disregard of the rule of law, and the breakdown of transparency, accountability, and good governance. But the victory lay in shambles just 22 months later.
The first villain in this sorry episode in the nation’s history is, of course, Mahathir, now ex-prime minister for the second time. But coming close behind him are Muhyiddin Yassin, now prime minister and Azmin Ali, now senior minister. If any one of them had not betrayed the rakyat, we would not have the current explosive political situation in the country.

Even as Sabah goes to the polls and as national polls may be held soon, but more likely later given the shaky position of Perikatan Nasional, or PN, as clearly demonstrated by the Sabah fight over seat allocations, Malaysians of all races must forever remember the role the three traitors played in thwarting their genuine aspirations for a better, more inclusive country.
They said they were doing it for Malay unity, but they were doing it for themselves - to protect their own interests and their own cronies. They turned back the wheels on fighting corruption and cutting patronage and promptly went back to the old ways, in the process betraying all Malaysians, including the Malay race who they claim to be protecting.
One of the enduring myths as far as this change is concerned is that it is what the Malays wanted. That’s wrong. Some two-thirds of Malays voted for the opposition in GE14, PAS was in the opposition then. It’s simplistic to assume that PAS will now keep its same support level of roughly a third given their alliance, or should we say dalliance, with Umno. And who’s to say the support for Umno, already down to about a third from just over half in 2013, won’t decline further?
The truth is that this change was not because that is what the Malays wanted but what corrupt unprincipled Malay leaders wanted. They, including many “frogs” among them, conspired to bring this about through dubious alliances for their own good, not for the people they purport to represent.

Instead, he said Harapan did not expect to win and therefore manifesto promises could not be kept or honoured. He sowed the seeds of dissension through Harapan by offering Lim Guan Eng the finance minister’s position without consultation with other parties, thereby earning the undying gratitude of DAP.
He drove a wedge between Azmin and PKR head and Harapan de facto head, Anwar Ibrahim, by bringing him into the cabinet while excluding Anwar and not so surreptitiously positioning him as Anwar’s alternative. He under-represented PKR in the cabinet while favouring Amanah, pushing Amanah and PKR apart.
There is a long litany of complaints against Mahathir, including the Sheraton Move. This article provides 22. In summary, if Mahathir had been a more effective prime minister and stuck to fulfilling manifesto promises, including passing the baton to Anwar, the Harapan government would not have fallen.

Right now, how much Mahathir was complicit in Muhyiddin becoming PM is a matter of conjecture, but anyone who follows Mahathir will know that he would prefer this arrangement of Malays having near-absolute power in government instead of genuine power-sharing for the benefit of all. But both the two Ms are of the “ketuanan Melayu” mould not because that’s the best for Malays but for the Malay political and business elite.
The first thing that Muhyiddin did was to muster support for himself by offering lucrative posts to nearly all MPs. He even postponed the convening of Parliament to reduce the chances of him losing parliamentary majority. You can read more about it here.
His Covid-19 plan, while praised widely, did not do enough for the poor, most of whom are Malays and other bumiputeras, leaving them in limbo. Part of the reason - he did not have the guts to make a pact with the opposition and go to Parliament for more funds to be given to the poor as explained here. He is an opportunist, not a saviour of the Malays. If he did not pull Bersatu out of Harapan, the Harapan government would still be in power.

This one-time staunch ally of Anwar used the excuse that the PKR leader was not supportive of him when allegations of a homosexual relationship were made. But that was a convenient event for him to distance himself from Anwar and further his own “career”. That seems to be in jeopardy as Umno is now deeply suspicious of him given his past record and is envious of his rapid rise.
I remember him eloquently and emotionally singing Anwar’s praises at an election rally in Gombak in 2013 but in politics, words count for little and one should choose allies by the strength of their actions. If he had not taken his 10 or so MPs out of PKR, Harapan would have survived as the government.
Going forward into GE15, we Malaysians must continuously remind ourselves of such traitors, what they did to us, and how they derailed our legitimate expectations for a better country for all of us, setting the country back for years if not decades. They deserve no forgiveness.
Remember too that there are extensions of them - such as the former boy minister, Mahathir’s protege, who is now touring Sabah ostensibly to support Warisan. In future coalitions that the current opposition makes, it is vitally important to choose your partners and new entrants carefully.
Remember too that Mahathir’s Malay-only Pejuang and his boy protege’s soon-to-be-launched multi-racial party for all youth will be looking for partners to team up with to become kings or at the very least kingmakers.
This time reject them firmly and you will have a better chance of staying in power - if you win that is, no easy task. Let not the fish jump out of the net again after it is caught. - P.Gunasegaram,mk
16 September 2020
2 kontrak tanah Y.Sabah diberi kpd the Aman brothers...

Datuk Seri Mohd. Shafie Apdal mendedahkan dua kontrak tanah milik Yayasan Sabah yang diberikan selama 100 tahun kepada ahli keluarga Tan Sri Musa Aman dan Datuk Seri Anifah Aman pada tahun 2015 dan 2018.
2. Tanah tersebut yang berkeluasan 11,000 hektar dan 50,000 hektar terletak di Hutan Simpan Kalabakan yang diberikan kepada Jawala Plantation Sdn. Bhd. (Jawala Plantation) dan Rentak Hasil Sdn. Bhd. (Rentak Hasil).
3. Kedua-dua perjanjian itu yang berakhir pada tahun 2115 dan 2118 didedahkan Ketua Menteri ketika berucap dalam Majlis Bersama Rakyat di Kunak pagi ini.
4. "Ini peta Yayasan Sabah apa yang disebut ini Jabatan Perhutanan Sabah sulit lagi, apa yang dibagi Hutan Simpan Sepulut, Hutan Simpan Kalabakan di Sepulut 11,000 hektar dari tahun 2015 sampai 2115 Hutan Simpan Sepulut siapa dibaginya, Jawala Plantation.
5. "Siapa dia, Tan Sri Majid Khan punya syarikat, anak dia pegang sekarang ini, Hutan Simpan Kalabakan keseluruhannya 11,000 hektar siapa punya?

6. "Syarikat siapa ini, ini keluarganya namanya syarikat ini yang dimiliki oleh keluarga Amin Khan, si Elbert Lim hampir 50,000 hektar tanah hampir 100,000 ekar dari tahun 2018 sampai 2118, 100 tahun tanah.
7. "Banyak lagi kalau saya nak sebut, syarikat Yayasan Sabah, apa syarikat Yayasan Sabah ini, Sabah Softwood Sdn Bhd apa yang dimiliki oleh Sabah Softwood 50,000 ekar dimiliki oleh Sabah Softwood.
9. "Rentak Hasil ini Softwood Sabah, Pengerusi dia dulu Musa Aman sekarang saya pasal automatik Ketua Menteri jadi pengerusi.
10. "Dulu Lembaga Pengarah dia Abdul Halim Egoh anak Tan Sri Hamid Egoh keluarga dia.
11. "Rentak Hasil anak syarikat Softwood dimiliki oleh Softwood 50 peratus, Rentak Hasil dimiliki oleh Perintis Bernas Sdn Bhd 5 peratus, siapa milik Rentak Hasil ini yang miliki syarikat di tengah-tengah Softwood yang ada perjanjian bagi minyak CPO kelapa sawit 100,000 tan setiap satu tahun perjanjian dia.
12. "Rentak Hasil siapa punya syarikat? Pemilik dia anak si Anifah Aman,” katanya.
13. Mohd. Shafie berkata, dokumen tersebut adalah bukti kerakusan keluarga Musa Aman merampas hasil bumi Sabah untuk kepentingan dan kekayaan ahli keluarga mereka.
14. Tegasnya, beliau sedia disaman dan akan menjadikan dokumen-dokumen perjanjian itu sebagai bukti.
15. " Saya ketua menteri saya tahu apa terkandung dalam dokumen kerajaan ini, ini bukti dia bukan tiada bukti. - borneo today
There’s a reason why they said “there’s no honour among thieves”. But in the case of backdoor Perikatan Nasional (PN) government, a loose coalition led by backdoor Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, the word honour does not exist at all in their dictionary. The only word the so-called “Malay-Muslim” parties – UMNO, PPBM and PAS – recognise is “power”.
As demonstrated by PM Muhyiddin himself, for the lust of power, the 73-year-old cancer survivor would not think twice about becoming a traitor. In fact, the “Malay First” Muhyiddin was more than willing to bribe and work with a crook like former PM Najib Razak just to get enough votes to topple his own legitimately voted Pakatan Harapan coalition government.
Under the pretext of Malay-Muslims unity, Muhyiddin pulled his party PPBM (Bersatu) out of the Pakatan ruling government and formed a fragile Perikatan coalition with then-opposition UMNO and PAS. Muhyiddin is a classic example where a Malay leader could abandon principle in exchange for power. But it was a wishful thinking that the 3 tigers can live happily ever after on the same mountain.
As caretaker Chief Minister Shafie Apdal unveiled what appears to be a powerful slogan – “We Are Here To Build A Nation, Not A Particular Race Or Religion” – as the Sabah state election kicks off after the nomination day, the opposite is happening to the Perikatan Nasional federal government, who happens to be the opposition in the Borneo state.
Actually, from the moment Mr. Shafie foiled Mr. Muhyiddin’s second coup attempt by decisively dissolved the Sabah Legislative Assembly before former Chief Minister Musa Aman could topple his government, the writing was already on the wall that not only both PPBM and UMNO cannot work together, but will try to destroy each other instead.
Make no mistake. The Sabah election is essentially a proxy war between two leaders – PPBM President Muhyiddin Yassin and UMNO President Zahid Hamidi. The lame duck prime minister, who depends on UMNO support for his government survival, desperately wanted to win Sabah election to strengthen his position before calling the next 15th General Election.
Muhyiddin Yassin - Prime Minister Legitimacy In Question
If Muhyiddin could lead Perikatan to capture Sabah, he may weaken Shafie’s powerbase and swing over his 9 MPs, the priceless commodities that would allow the prime minister to survive until the end of his term in 2023 without calling for a snap election. More importantly, a victory would provide him the bargaining chip when negotiates with UMNO over seat allocation for the next nationwide election.
But Zahid, who is facing record 87 charges related to money laundering and corruption and criminal breach of trust (CBT), is equally desperate to win Sabah to prove not only his leadership in UMNO, but also to legitimise UMNO’s dominance in both Perikatan Nasional and Muafakat Nasional, an alliance between UMNO Malay nationalist party and PAS Islamist party.
More importantly, if Zahid could drive Barisan Nasional (comprises UMNO, MCA and MIC) to recapture the Sabah state that it lost in the 2018 General Election, it would further weaken Muhyiddin’s power and probably force the PM to drop all the criminal charges against him. After all, did not Muhyiddin’s appointed Attorney General Idrus Harun drop all the 46 criminal charges against Musa Aman?
The distrust between PPBM and UMNO saw how PM Muhyiddin was humiliated when he had to call off a highly anticipated launch of his Perikatan Nasional in Sabah on August 29. Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC), a component party of Barisan Nasional, was persuaded by UMNO to pull out from joining Perikatan at the eleventh hour, a slap in the face of Muhyiddin.
Already hit with UMNO’s refusal to formally join his Perikatan, Muhyiddin wanted allies in Sabah to contest under a new PN logo. But Zahid purposely made negotiations over the campaign as difficult as possible for PPBM. The once dominant UMNO prefers to contest under its decades-old BN (Barisan Nasional) flag in an ugly tussle for dominance ever since Muhyiddin was sworn in on March 1.
With less than 24 hours before the nomination day on Saturday (Sept 12), Muhyiddin was forced to chair an emergency 90-minute meeting with all allies that included PN (consists of PPBM, PAS, Star, SAPP), BN (comprises UMNO, MCA, MIC and PBRS) and PBS (Parti Bersatu Sabah) to prevent multi-cornered contest. Zahid emerged from the meeting and said everyone had agreed to avoid clashes.
Of course, the UMNO president lied through his teeth. Before nomination day, there were 11 state seats that clashed among PN, BN and PBS. After the nomination day, the seats that will see clashes increased to 17. Zahid had deceived Muhyiddin, pretending to agree, but behind the scene, he deliberately ignored the truce brokered by the prime minister.
Muhyiddin thought that his hastily formed GRS, comprises his own Perikatan Nasional coalition (PN), Barisan Nasional (BN) and Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS), could work the same way he betrayed and toppled his previous Pakatan Harapan government. He didn’t realize he could only use the trick once. Zahid saw the deception and countered with his own false pretences, as did PBS, a party led by Maximus Johnity Ongkili.
Zahid has nothing to lose by openly undermining and challenging every single decision of the prime minister. Since Najib was convicted and sent 12 years in jail, Zahid has been creating troubles – refused to join PN, coaxed MIC to reject PN, suggested Bung Moktar as UMNO’s choice for Sabah Chief Minister post, decided UMNO and allies to contest in all 73 seats against PN and whatnot.
At the end, 447 candidates will fight for Sabah’s 73 seats – an average of 6 contestants for one seat. Bengkoka seat alone is a jaw-dropping 11-cornered fight. Muhyiddin’s PN has 29 contestants while Zahid’s BN insisted on contesting 41 seats and PBS has pushed its 22 candidates to fight in the already crowded battle.
The fact that UMNO will contest 32 seats as compared to PPBM’s 19 suggests that lame duck Muhyiddin fails to control UMNO. To save face, the prime minister retaliated by proposing Sabah PPBM Chief Hajiji Mohd Noor as the next chief minister, clashing against UMNO’s suggestion that their Sabah chief, Bung Moktar, would become the next chief minister.
While Muhyiddin might be the most powerful man in Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah is a different kettle of fish altogether. Playing 3R (race, religion and royalty) cards in this Borneo state is an act of hara-kiri. Therefore, to the surprise of PAS, neither UMNO nor PPBM wanted the Islamist party to contest in Sabah. Yes, the biggest sucker is none other than PAS.
Some genius analysts have been going around telling all and sundry that PAS was very clever by joining two separate coalitions, Muafakat (with UMNO) and Perikatan (with PPBM). Even PAS leaders thought they were brilliant for becoming the kingmaker. But if that is true, exactly why did both UMNO and PPBM ditched them as if the Islamist party was more toxic than Covid-19?
At first, PAS secretary-general Takiyuddin Hassan confidently declared that his party had asked for up to 10 seats in the Sabah state election. However, at the eleventh hour, to the Sabah PAS leadership’s horror, the party was not even invited to the PN Sabah state election candidate announcement in Kota Kinabalu. Likewise, its closest ally UMNO had given it zero seats.
PAS was humiliated – “kemaluan besar” – as former MIC Samy Vellu liked to say. To save face, PAS President Hadi Awang claimed the party was not contesting any seats for the sake of “muafakat (cooperation)”. Hadi also said his party has decided to give way to its allies to ensure straight fights, which is a truckload of cow dung because all the 73 seats are multi-cornered fights.
Perhaps PAS should give way to its allies in the 15th General Election too for the sake of “muafakat”. Comically, it was the same Mr. Hadi who said a fortnight ago that the Islamist party was ready to contest under Barisan Nasional’s ticket in Sabah. Then, PAS Deputy President Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man claimed the move was a political strategy to avoid “enemy’s trap”.
Another PAS leader said despite not contesting, the party is “still contesting” as both BN and PN act as their representative. Going by PAS’ twisted logic, it means that despite not able to having sexual intercourse with their wife, they are “still having” sexual intercourse as their friends are representing them. Some other PAS leaders, however, expressed their sadness for not given any seat at all.
In the 2018 General Election, Amanah won only 193 votes and zero seats in Sabah state election. Yet, caretaker Chief Minister Shafie is kind enough this time to still allocate 1 seat to his friend Amanah in the Sabah election. PAS, meanwhile, had captured 11,241 votes in 2018. Why can’t BN or PN be humane enough to give at least 1 seat to PAS in the name of Muslim brotherhood?
In reality, PAS is too toxic to be given any seat to contest in Sabah. Some Islamist extremists in the party like the arrogant Pasir Puteh MP Nik Muhammad Zawawi Salleh have insulted the Christians in Sabah for saying that the Bible was distorted. The PAS leader’s racist and extremist remarks is seen as against Sabah’s multi-religious and multi-cultural society.
Like it or not, PAS was backstabbed by both Perikatan (Muhyiddin’s PPBM) and Muafakat (Zahid’s UMNO) at the same time. But the Islamist party’s top guns have to cook up ridiculous half-baked stories for the sake of their current ministerships or chairmanships which comes with perks like 5-figure salaries, cash allowances, free cars, official residences, and multi-million-dollar contracts and projects. - FT
14 September 2020
Sekolah berasrama dah tak selamat...
Saya menuntut pihak sekolah, kementerian pendidikan dan PDRM untuk bertindak segera. Video seumpamanya perlu disebar meluas dan tindakan tegas perlu diambil. - Anwar Ibrahim
Hari tu kat Kelantan, tak taulah video ni baru atau kes lama.. Tapi apa2 pun.. Mmg sial betul budak2 ni..Takkan takdak tindakan yg boleh diambil terhadap mereka.. paling2 pun buang sekolah saja.. kes membakar dgn sengaja asrama tahfiz haritu pun tak dihukum mati atas alasan bawah umur..
Budak2 sial macam ni tak harus ada dikalangan pelajar lain. Cara terbaik ialah dgn letak terus dipenjara sekurang2nya 5 tahun.. Pengetua dan Warden Asrama juga harus dikenakan tindakan.. sebab berlaku di Sekolah dan bawah tanggungjawab mereka. - f/bk

Tiga pelajar yang disyaki memukul seorang junior di sebuah asrama sekolah menengah, di sini, direman empat hari bermula hari ini. Perintah tahanan reman hingga Ahad ini terhadap ketiga-tiga suspek berusia 17 tahun itu dikeluarkan oleh Majistret Mohd Zul Zakiquddin Zulkifli. (Tak pasti sama ada tiga pelajar yang direman itu adalah pelajar yang sama dalam video di atas).
Mereka direman bagi membantu siasatan mengikut Seksyen 506 Kanun Keseksaan kerana ugutan jenayah dan Seksyen 323 Kanun Keseksaan kerana dengan sengaja menyebabkan kecederaan. Terdahulu, kesemua pelajar Tingkatan Lima itu tiba di pekarangan Mahkamah Majistret dengan menaiki lori polis pada jam 9 pagi tadi.
Media sebelum ini melaporkan dalam kejadian petang kelmarin, seorang pelajar Tingkatan Satu dipukul tiga pelajar sekolah sama yang dikatakan berang kerana dipermainkan dengan gurauan berkaitan belanja makan.
Ketua Polis Kelantan, Deputy Komisioner Shafein Mamat, dipetik berkata justeru mangsa berusia 13 tahun itu membuat laporan polis, semalam, sebelum tangkapan dilakukan.
Berdasarkan rakaman video berdurasi 25 saat yang tular sejak semalam, mangsa dipukul bertubi-tubi, termasuk ditumbuk dan disepak, dalam insiden itu. - BH
Rupa2nya satu satunya Kerusi tradisi yang PAS kata kuat, ada jentera di Karamunting pun diserahkan kepada MCA dan PBS… Itu kalau pemimpin PAS sendiri tak merungut.. kita pun tak tahu…
Elok lah..Allah nak tunjuk, Kawasan tu Majoriti Bumiputera Melayu.. Tapi diserahkan pada parti Cina MCA, dan Parti Kristian PBS.. tapi takda sapa pun mana mana dari Pejuang Melayu..Ustaz2 hat kata PAS tunduk kepada orang Kapir atau jadi Khadam MCA..
Ingat lagi.. Masa PRK Permatang Pauh, Itu kerusi tradisi Ds Anwar.. Selepas Anwar dipenjara, Ulama PAS siap buat fatwa haram undi Wan Azizah.. Kononnya sebab tolak Hudud.. Bila wartawan tanya Haji Hadi..Haji Hadi s seeolah olah setuju dengan fatwa Ulama PAS permatang pauh, dia jawab cakap no komen..
Cuma nak bagi tahu, hat DAP yang hangpa fitnah anti Islam..Satu kerusi PAS dia tak pernah ambil pun.. Siap depa bagi laluan kat PAS kerusi majoriti Cina hanya sebab masa tu nak menangkan calon PAS…
Bila Haji Hadi bergaduh dengan DAP.. bayangkan, walhal DAP cuma lawan MCA dan MIC.. PAS datang kempen tolak DAP..ada kawasan DAO, PAS letak calon punya jahat nak bagi DAP kalah... Itulah wajah jahat,dengki dan khianat parti lebai PAS ni..
Why is he releasing all the frogs n tadpoles out into the Sabah ponds? It might be a "heads I win, Tails u lose" strategy. either way Moodin wins. Although it may look chaotic n unwinnable, in the end Moodin might be the Biggest Winner like a fisherman casting his net far n wide to catch all the frogs n tadpoles alike. how?
But first he has to make sure ABU (Anyone but Umno) ie. UMNO lose as many seats as possible, coz UMNO is the biggest threat to Moodin n Bersatu's survival in W Msia.
Assuming PN n UMNO win 50% of their seats ie each win 15 seats +/- 2 (total will be 30+) but neither Bersatu or UMNO can claim the CM seat (seems fair enough). That's where Musa comes in w his collections of frogs and tadpoles rounded up w his dragnet with 10 -20 seats. it will be a sure bet that Anifah Aman (Musa Aman's brother) w even a few seats wud join the grand coalition w Moodin and UMNO, to be the next Sabah CM. Musa Aman will be rewarded a Federal minister post, n appt'd a senator.
That way, Moodin ensures that Sabah will not be controlled by UMNO to ensure that UMNO is in no position to challenge Moodin for the PMship or seat allocations for GE-15. But if Warisan wins between 20 - 30 seats.... not enough to be outright CM ..... Moodin will extend an olive branch out to Shafie. Join PN n still be CM. that way Sabah will still be under Moodin's govt.
But what if Warisan wins big w a bigger majority, enough to continue to rule Sabah under Warisan Plus? then Moodin will not call for GE-15, n use all sorts of pressure, to "move mountains" ie. get Warisan to team up w PN. Otherwise, more tragedies like the 1976 Double Tragedy or 2015 Nothing-2-hide Sabah Mv6 quake will hit Sabah again n again ...
Or more frogs from Warisan plus be bought up until Warisan govt collapse again. n this time, they will ensure the Governor does not accede to Shafie's request to dissolve the State Assembly. This Moodin BDG is turning out to be most devilish n evil of all the past PMs combined. Moodin must be replaced or Msia is finish. - Amin Fasaili

The comments by the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) on the two new charges against me for misappropriation of property, amounting to RM208.7 million under the penal code in relation to the tunnel and three highway project(tunnel project), has only reinforced public suspicion that the charges are politically motivated.
First, the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), and now the AGC is going all out against me with their comments that they are 99 percent sure of a conviction in line with the Perikatan Nasional's government new political strategy of "Ini semua salah Lim Guan Eng" (this is all Lim Guan Eng's fault).
I had earlier faced three charges for corruption in relation to the tunnel project even though no corruption or gratification money was found in my personal bank account or in my possession as cash. And yet I am charged - "Ini semua salah Lim Guan Eng".
The tunnel project was granted by open tender in 2013 decided by the Penang State Tender Board headed by the state secretary and other senior government officers. And yet I am charged when I am not in the State Tender Board - "Ini semua salah Lim Guan Eng".
The payment of RM208 million decided by land swap is in accordance with the agreement signed between the state government and contractor decided by the exco and other technical committees. And yet I am charged when I was not the only one making the decision on the agreement - "Ini semua salah Lim Guan Eng".
The decision to pay RM 208 million was made after recommendation by an independent expert engineering consultant to senior government officers. The independent consultant was appointed by open tender. Despite not making the recommendation or decision to pay because I am not an engineer, yet I am the one charged - "Ini semua salah Lim Guan Eng".
My lawyers can not understand why the AGC is so intent on transferring my case to Kuala Lumpur, even though the charges against me allegedly occurred from beginning to end, entirely in Penang. What is even more unusual is the belligerent remarks by the AGC against me.

Lead deputy public prosecutor (DPP) Wan Shaharuddin Wan Ladin boasted of a sure win with a 99 percent chance of conviction, and that the two new charges were the mother of all charges.
This is not the mother of all charges. Instead, it is the mother of all PN's lies that "this is all Lim Guan Eng's fault".
The DPP's remarks of a 99 percent conviction chance are inappropriate and have already prejudged me, even before my trial, that I am already guilty. Many have commented that the DPP's public statements are potentially dangerous, can destroy a person's reputation and prejudice my right to a fair trial.
The latest two charges on Friday that I had misappropriated government property amounting to RM208 million is baseless and illogical when I had not taken any benefit. The land valued at RM208 million was payment in the form of a land swap in accordance with the agreement between the state government and the contractor.
Further, the land was transferred after the final decision by the exco. If I am charged, then will this also lead to the preposterous conclusion that all exco members or the entire state government and its 10,000 staff will also have to be charged? - Lim Guan Eng




















