04 May 2018

55,045 pengundi hantu dikesan di Batu Tiga saja...


DUN Batu Tiga mengesan pengundi baru meningkat kepada 55,054 orang melalui senarai pendaftar pemilik Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) bagi suku keempat, di kawasan itu.

Calon DUN Batu Tiga, Rodziah Ismail berkata, perkara itu didapati sejurus selesai penamaan calon, pada 28 April lalu ketika bilik gerakannya memproses data pemilik yang diperoleh daripada SPR.

Katanya, angka itu meningkat dalam tempoh kurang tiga bulan, berbanding 53,000 pengundi sebelumnya.

“Data itu masih dalam proses untuk kita lihat berapa ramai lagi pengundi hantu.

“Memang pelik, namun bilik gerakan saya masih dalam usaha memproses data itu sehingga hari ini,” katanya ketika Ceramah Mega, di Dataran Sri Tupai Seksyen 20, baru-baru ini.


My late grandfather (mum's side), passed away 24 YEARS AGO, is still a voter in Sungai Sibuga, 
the constituency for Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman. - Adrian Lim Chee En

Lebih menghairankan, Rodziah berkata, seramai 30 warga emas berusia lebih 110 tahun didaftarkan sebagai pengundi di kawasannya.

Katanya, ia membabitkan penduduk di Taman Rashna seramai sembilan orang, manakala di Seksyen 17 seramai lima orang.

“Selama 10 tahun (dua penggal) saya menjadi wakil rakyat di sini, belum ada warga emas yang saya ketemu berusia melebihi 110 tahun.

“Lebih mengejutkan dua minggu lalu apabila kita turun ke lapangan, kita dapati alamat rumah tidak wujud di Seksyen 17 dengan jumlah pengundinya mencecah 20 orang.

“Justeru, kita perlu lipat gandakan tenaga dan seru semua rakyat turun mengundi supaya kita dapat lawan pengundi hantu yang tidak wujud ini,” katanya. - selangorkini


Bukan ‘kingmaker’ tapi PAS 
akan tumbang di Kelantan...

Bekas Menteri Kewangan Tun Daim Zainuddin menjangkakan bahawa PAS akan kehilangan Kelantan pada pilihan raya umum 9 Mei ini.

Dalam satu wawancara dengan akhbar harian Cina, Nanyang Siang Pau, Daim juga berkata bahawa PAS tidak akan menang banyak pada kali ini dan oleh itu, mereka tidak akan menjadi “kingmaker” atau “pembuat keputusan”.

Beliau menjelaskan bahawa pengundi hari ini melihat pemimpin PAS terlalu rapat dengan Umno, yang suatu ketika dahulu ditolak terus oleh Presiden PAS Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang dan bekas Mursyidul Am PAS, Allahyarham Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat.

"Akhir-akhir ini, kamu lihat bahawa ketiga-tiga anak bekas pemimpin PAS memilih untuk meninggalkan parti itu.

"Terdapat perpecahan dalam parti itu, mereka tidak boleh menerima apa terjadi kepada PAS hari ini, " kata Daim.

Beliau berkata sejarah membuktikan bahawa Umno sering mengambil kesempatan ke atas PAS, terutamanya apabila parti pemerintah itu adalah lemah, tetapi mengketepikannya apabila mereka tidak lagi memerlukannya.

"Sama dengan Akta 355... pemimpin (PAS) tahu ini permainan politik Umno.

"Malangnya, mereka beri penyokong (mereka) harapan palsu," katanya, merujuk kepada usaha Abdul Hadi meminda Akta Mahkamah Syariah (Bidang Kuasa Jenayah) 1965 untuk meningkatkan bidang kuasa hukuman mahkamah syariah. 

Walaupun pentadbiran Najib membenarkan usul itu dibentangkan pada 2016, namun Dewan Rakyat tidak pernah mengundi mengenainya dan rang undang-undang itu kekal terumbang-ambing.

Sementara itu, Daim juga tidak menjangkakan kemungkinan Umno dan PAS membentuk kerajaan perpaduan.

Beliau berkata Umno perlu mengambil kira perasaan parti bukan Islam lain dalam BN, termasuk mereka dari Sabah dan Sarawak. - mk

Daim: Kedah, Perak mungkin juga jatuh

Image result for Tun Daim Zainuddin
Tun Daim Zainuddin's Interview 
With Nanyang Siang Pau

Q :  With the establishment of Pakatan Harapan lineup, many people believe this was the strongest and tougher opponent ever to BN, especially with Tun Dr Mahathir take the leading role, what is Tun comment?

1.    Many believe so. This is the strongest and toughest opposition as now they have Tun Mahathir, Anwar Ibrahim, Lim Kit Siang, Mat Sabu plus their lieutenants, supporters and volunteers. They also have YB Muhyiddin, YAB Lim Guan Eng, YAB Azmin Ali and YB Mukhriz. On paper, this is very formidable. I don't think their supporters want them to be paper tigers.

2.    Previously voters had party loyalties but now, voters vote based on policies. Policies must be in line with what the voters think can be implemented; otherwise they are just empty promises. It has to be realistic and convincing.

3.    Tun Mahathir was an UMNO President and held office as the PM for 22 years. They have Deputy Prime Ministers, Menteri Besar and ministers in their parties. Lim Kit Siang was leader of the Opposition for a long time. Of course this is a big credit to the current Opposition.

Based on the actions and statements from BN and UMNO leaders, it clearly shows that they are worried and very scared. I am not happy that some statements have been too personal. This goes against our culture and beyond politicking. This is not healthy. Leaders must always set a good example to the people.

Q : Tun Dr Mahathir as an asset or liability to Pakatan Harapan? Did this latest opposition front lineup works?

1.    Of course to PH, he is an asset but in the eyes of BN, they have to say he is a liability. A few members of the PH component parties initially protested. In politics, you can't expect everyone to agree to everything. lf we believe in democracy, we must respect the decision of the majority. But those who disagree, they can object.

2.    From what l have read, these are equal partners. It means no party dominates. Before this, there were those who called Tun Mahathir a dictator and they said dictators don't change. Dictators don’t listen to others. We have heard that Tun Mahathir said he does not agree that tolls should be abolished but he was overruled. Isn’t this a sign of change?

3.    Do dictators give up office voluntarily? Under Tun Mahathir, his old party was declared unlawful. It was de-registered. He didn’t interfere with the ROS or the Court. He was called MahaFiraun but he allowed Semangat 46 and PKR to contest in the elections. Those who used to be under him are now saying he was a dictator. Why didn’t they resign like Musa Hitam and Tengku Razaleigh? Is it because they prefer to retain their positions and have no principles?

4.    Clearly PH is not BN. lt is inconceivable that Lim Kit Siang, Mat Sabu, Anwar and his family will allow Tun Mahathir to bulldoze everything. Tun Mahathir is a highly intelligent man and he knows that the present generation is very different from those of the 80s and 90s era. 

5.    Tun is very pragmatic and reads the ground well. Although he is 93 years of age, he understands the needs, expectations and aspirations of the young.

6.    The reading is that Umno and BN have not changed. Rakyat think PH and the component parties have read the situation correctly.


Image may contain: 2 people, people smiling, text

Q:  Is there really a “dream team” for Pakatan Harapan? Can Tun Dr Mahathir and Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim sincerely forgive each other for the sake of common political ground?

1.    Dream team only exists in dreams. PH has many intelligent young leaders who subscribe to the ideals of democracy. The experienced leaders were idealistic and have made huge sacrifices to their freedom. Some were detained for their beliefs.  Now all of these leaders are together fighting against corruption, Kleptocracy and wastage. They promise to respect and honour the supreme law of the country that is our constitution. 

2.    lf we read and understand the constitution, we cannot ask for more. All of us must respect and follow the law. Nobody is above the constitution.

3.    The opposition pledge their promises in their recent manifesto. If they don’t keep their promises, voters will reject them in the next elections. Democracy gives voters the choice to choose the government. 

4.    I know both Tun Mahathir and Anwar Ibrahim quite well. Since their reconciliation, l have spoken to both. Tun Mahathir and Anwar had worked together before, until they went their separate ways. We read their statements. YB Dr Wan Azizah and YB Nurul Izzah have accepted this reconciliation and if the family members accept, who are we to question? Yes, they have come together for a common cause i.e. to save this country. What bigger sacrifice do we want from these leaders? 

Q :  Did Tun believe that, the claim by DAP leader, they wish through Tun Dr Mahathir influence, will stir the necessary Malay Tsunami to make an in road to Putrajaya?

14.    Tun Mahathir still has influence among different age groups. He was PM for 22 years. He retired voluntarily. He developed this country and gave pride to Malaysia and Malaysians. ln 22 years, you can't expect perfection. Mistakes were made but overall, he did an excellent job. This was recognized by Time Magazine where it described him as “The Builder”. He is the builder of modern Malaysia and nobody can deny this. Those who were part of the team should be proud of what was achieved. I am very proud. During his tenure, he overcame two recessions and the country did better after he introduced some new policies to take this country forward.

15.    During the two recessions that the country faced, he made sure the government took care of the rakyat. He had strong confidence in his policies and he was so brave to call for elections during these difficult and critical times. The rakyat rewarded him with a 2/3 majority in Parliament on both occasions.

16.    So those in their 50s and 60s know his services to Malaysia and his achievements. They believe in him and l think they will give their full support to him. The younger generations are exposed to the world and with the state of the art technology, they can get instant news. In the past, the young generation were normally anti-establishment and voted for the Opposition. 

17.    PH does not really need a Malay tsunami to win the election. A swing of around 10% is sufficient. The urban areas traditionally vote for the Opposition. Now with smart phones and advance technology, even semi urban areas get instant news. This will become a danger to BN.

18.    What is left are rural areas. News about Felda, Tabung Haji and other agencies are widely spread. If the rural people who traditionally support Umno receive these news, support for Umno will be affected and eroded. l am told second generation settlers are very angry with the government. l remember l cautioned the government about the impact on the listing of Felda, but when you are no longer in government, who will listen to you? TH depositors are not happy too.

19.    I believe DAP is predicting a Malay Tsunami based on these factors, but do you need a Malay Tsunami to get to Putrajaya? l don't think so.



Q :   What are Tun prediction of the 14th GE possible outcome? Did BN will eventually fall finally? Or other way round, BN make a strong come back, even recapture the two third majority in parliament?   If yes, what are the major factor? If BN facing another major setback, what are the major reason?

1.    Let me make it very clear l am not in the business of predicting election results. I have retired from business too. l don't do any research. But l meet a lot of people. l read analysis from the think tanks, hear from politicians representing all the parties in Malaysia, from journalists, taxi drivers’ talks in coffee shops and suraus. I receive news from Whatsapp and I watch YouTube. I have old and new friends who give me feedback. Then l make my own conclusions.

2.   The Opposition according to many is the strongest ever. They managed to put their differences aside and put up a united front which is very rare in Malaysian politics. Imagine a common logo and DAP sacrificing its rocket. This is the best evidence of sacrifice for common cause. This is the biggest news for the rakyat. They have one main agenda that is to topple BN hence attack is mainly concentrated on Najib given that he is seemingly their Achilles heel.

3.  BN’s biggest problem is to explain 1MDB to urban voters. I think the government’s biggest blunder was not to address this scandal when it first surfaced. The government should have just admitted that 1MDB is a big mistake. Rakyat will eventually forgive but what they can’t forgive is when the government is abusing the law and hide their wrongdoings.

4. Sacking the DPM and a senior minister did not solve the problem, rather it may have done the opposite. It is now an international scandal involving so many countries. We have no control over other countries nor their media. These days we get instant news. The government and ministers can deny but these denials make the educated and urbanite very angry and they distrust the government. Whatever good the government does, is being negated by the 1MDB scandal. How can one deny DOJ’s report when there is mention of MO1.  And a minister in the PM’s department confirmed to BBC that only idiots do not know MO1 is Najib. This is major scandal which the Government needs to address in order to regain trust from the rakyat but yet, in parliament this subject cannot be raised.

5.  We have 3 former cabinet ministers made known their views on certain issues. Two were immediately condemned. lnstead of replying point by point on matters raised, they were accused of having ulterior motives or revenge. People think this country has reached a stage that supporters of government have become irrational, intolerable and have no ability to rebut logically. 

6.  In the rural areas they are blaming the government for high cost of living. The Opposition put the blame on GST and tell the people that the government is forced to introduce GST because they have to repay the loan from 1MDB. The government so far fails to explain why the cost of living has gone up. Mere denials by saying things here are cheaper than in Singapore are just silly and lame. They are being ridiculed by the Opposition. The Opposition on the other hand has promised to abolish GST. 1MDB and GST are the two factors that are very difficult for the government to answer. 

7.   Will BN win? BN and its predecessor, the Alliance Party has been running this country since independence. In any country, this is indeed too long.

8.   But BN is the incumbent and has many advantages. Recent delineation of constituencies and Anti-Fake laws are signs of fear but of great advantages to the incumbent. Rahman Dahlan is a big fan of the Anti-fake laws.

9.   BN is trying to take advantage of these two recent laws to win the elections. lf these work then together with the uncertainty of the postal votes by civil servants, BN will win and maybe win big. The foreign media have been highlighting this as stealing. lf voters are angry and believe the government is stealing the elections, they will vote against BN, and this will ultimately be their downfall. This will create history. For those who believe and support a genuine practice of democracy, this is cause for celebration.

10.  We can read the moods, the various actions, the talks in the coffee shops, the chatters among taxi drivers or Grab drivers. The anger over GST, the high cost of living in the country, IMDB, the scandals in MARA, FELDA, Tabung Haji and FGV, the depreciation of ringgit, and the issues on unemployment when graduates have to become Grab drivers and sell nasilemak. We are seeing more graduates are currently unemployed. The government is not creating skilled jobs as their focus is more on services sector. This is one of the main cause of the high unemployment rate especially for fresh graduates. These are of great concern to all.



Q :  What are Tun prediction of BN component parties like MCA, GERAKAN and SUPP fate?

1.    MCA and Gerakan have been losing support and as one minister said; DAP represents the Chinese (as shown in the last elections). MCA needs Malay votes to win elections. I think Umno thinks it does not need Chinese’ support anymore as shown by the recent redelineation exercise. Even the Chairman of EC confirmed that the delineation was to make constituencies race based. It is unbecoming for the EC Chairman to confirm this publicly. And Umno seems to prefer PAS. At least we see their Presidents together and very cordial towards each other. The PM and Mustapha Mohammad were photographed together with PAS leaders. 

2.    The second Finance Minister said he does not need Chinese and Indian votes to win his seat. Isn’t this clear UMNO does not need MCA, Gerakan, MIC, etc? Are the opposition and the rakyat wrong to believe that Umno’s plan is just relying on Malay votes hence the redeleniation exercise and the close rapport with PAS.

3.     MCA and the rest of component parties have lost credibility with the voters because they were silent on 1MDB. Their silence on 1MDB reflects their subservient approach towards Umno. Not a word about Jho Low and they never asked why is he hiding. Why hide unless he has committed some crime? Surely, they must have read all the foreign reports and watch TV news and videos. To non-Malays and urban people they can only come to one conclusion; these parties support corruption and kleptocracy. What kind of example are they giving to the young? Where is their principle in politics and life?

4.    By their silence, it seems that they endorse Kleptocracy which no one in his right mind can accept. The government admitted it adopted the wrong business model on 1MDB. You can’t succeed in a business with RM1 million paid up capital and borrowings of USD11 billion. Ask those in business whether this is what they call business. The PM himself said mistakes were made. But sadly, MCA, Gerakan and MIC have not uttered a word. I was asked on 1MDB years ago and my replies are on record. Why create 1MDB as a sovereign fund when we already have Khazanah?

5.    MCA in the last elections promised not to join the cabinet if Chinese voters rejected them.  They were rejected and later broke their pledge. How can the Chinese trust them? They have no credibility. Umno seems to reject them as shown by the delineation exercise. And UMNO has also made a cruel attack on Malaysian’s most successful businessman : Robert Kuok. And don’t forget that Robert is from Johor and has helped the Johoreans and Malaysians. What has happened to government’s policy to produce “glocal” businessmen? What other conclusions can you come to when you study the delineation exercise? These parties committed suicide by voting in Parliament. 

6.    MCA has insulted Tun Mahathir who was our PM for 22 years by calling him an “old horse”. People get very angry and replied it’s better to have an old horse with brain rather than the young horse with no principles. The latest slogan is “Undi Biru Tua jangan PM tua” but many said that they prefer an old man who fights for the people than a party who is silent on 1MDB and corruption.

7.    Tun Mahathir has proven to be agile and sharp. It is a sign of a nation's progress that a 93-year-old person is able to sustain a punishing political campaign, offering quality arguments and content. He even challenged Najib to debate with him.

8.    MCA can continue to insult Tun Mahathir but in a recent study conducted by a UK research center, the finding was Tun Mahathir is the most admired man in Malaysia and Najib is no. 14.


Image result for penang and selangor
Q :  Is that possibility BN may lose more state? Selangor and Penang outcome?

1.   The mood as of now is for change. But whether there will be change will depend on the voters. The conditions, according to many reports are ripe for change. Voters will study the manifestos and listen to speeches. But most importantly, for the parties to win, they have to put the right and clean candidates with integrity. The locals must like the candidates and trust them to be their future wakil rakyat.

2.   Before this, the Opposition used to say BN means “BarangNaik”. BarangNaik has become a reality. Now the Opposition says BN means “Bini Najib”. A vote for BN means a vote for “Bini Najib” as many believe that she is running the government. The opposition says that UMNO believes in RAHMAN (Tengku Abdul Rahman, Abdul Razak, Hussein Onn, Mahathir Mohammad, Abdullah Badawi and Najib Razak, and noticed that Najib’s name is the last) and Najib has selected 9th May as polling day, which falls on Wednesday or “Rabu”. They are now saying “rakyat akan buang UMNO’ on this day. On the 9th May 2016, Philippines has elected new President. On 9th May 2017, South Korea has elected new President and on 9th May 2018, God willing, Malaysia will elect a new Prime Minister. The rakyat are now giving the PM a big “thank you” for R.A.B.U.

3.   From many feedbacks received, if Mukhriz spends time in Kedah and with Tun Mahathir’s influence, BN will lose Kedah. For Penang and Selangor, PH will retain the states. Both states have sorted out their candidates.

4.   I think BN will retain Perlis. For Perak, if PH has a good candidate for Menteri Besar, they will take back the state. Voters are still very angry with the way BN has “stolen” the state.  YAB Zambry is a popular MB but is quite a loner.

5.  Negeri Sembilan has a long history of infighting. This time it will depend on how Umno treats local leaders. If this is not handled well, and if PH has good candidate for Menteri Besar, then PH has a slim chance of winning. In Melaka, Umno is not happy with the leadership but PH must get good candidates to mount a challenge. Did you notice the empty chairs at Umno’s functions and the open protests in Perlis, Kuala Pilah, Melaka, Tanjong Malim, Batu and Gua Musang? Are these the signs that people are no longer scared?[21][videos]

6.   On Johor, it is a known fact that it is UMNO’s stronghold but PH has a chance if Muhyiddin spends more time there. Shortly after PH launched its logo in Pasir Gudang, TMJ has issued a statement but claimed that it is not a political statement. Many read this message as Umno is losing ground and the palace has read the situation well. People will make their own judgements. The State Government has commissioned a study on its support. People say that the MB may lose his seat but rakyat is very sympathetic of him. Those who used to work with the MB believe that BN will lose the state. But as I said earlier, the voters want candidates with integrity and with principles. They know what is good for them. Big crowds come out to listen to ceramah from PH but big crowds is meaningless unless they are translated into votes.[video]

7.  The palace of Selangor and Perlis have issued statements that they are above politics.

8.   It’s a 50/50 chance in Sabah. However, we know that Sabahans are fiercely independent and have changed state government many times. YB Shafie Afdal has spent a lot of time in order to win.

9.  For Sarawak, BN will win.



Q : UMNO's cooperation with PAS has always been an issue and it has pros and cons to BN itself, will there be any chance of cooperation between the two parties in certain issues in coming PRU?

1.   On Cooperation with PAS, the leaderships are very close but this is not reflected at the grass roots level. They have been at each other all these years. PAS used to call Umno members infidels. They prayed separately. ln Umno’s history, when it was weak it would court PAS and invariably PAS would throw its support for Umno. Once Umno regained its strength it will find excuses to kick PAS out.

2.  PAS is against GST but in the Parliament, they always supported the government on budgets. This is strange logic. Surely PAS is not confused. As I said, PAS wants to be a kingmaker but they have make it very clear that they will not work with DAP which is a component party under PH. The public conclude that PAS just wants to help BN and in particular UMNO. Yet BN has MCA, Gerakan, MIC and parties in Sarawak and Sabah that oppose the RUU355. BN and in particular UMNO, has delayed this bill for a long time, just to pretend that it supports the bill. Umno knows that if this bill is allowed to be debated, the non-Muslims will not support and this may cause a split within BN. Sadly, PAS’ leadership keeps giving hope to its members. But most of them know that Umno is just playing politics.

3.   I have been following speeches made by PAS’ leaders during this campaign. They are putting up 160 candidates which means a party with most candidates. Yet in most speeches they condemn Tun Mahathir and seems to praise Najib, l suppose this is what they mean by “kingmaker”. When they dropped an incumbent, they said “we are resting him, not dropping him”. PAS leaders confuse us with many contradicting statements. They say there is no need to get rid of a person like Najib but just advise him. They want to correct the system from within. If we follow their logic Mugabe should not be toppled. South Africa should have kept Zuma. Indonesia and Philippines made mistakes getting rid of Suharto and Marcos. Brazil and Peru should get advice from PAS. Umno has made a mistake about Tengku Abdul Rahman and should not have forced him to retire.

4.   It seems like PAS does not understand Umno’s culture. Umno’s president always tells members to be loyal to him. Loyalty to president is their culture, and even when the president makes big blunders everybody should remain loyal. How do you change from within? And who is PAS to advice and change Umno from within? The rakyat is right to be very suspicious of PAS’ real intention in this election.

5.   The rakyat are not sure if PAS is truly an Islamic party as it seems unwilling to fight corruption. They use the same tone and language as Umno’s. UMNO uses the word ‘derma’, now PAS also uses the word ‘derma’. When people hear the voice recording involving Nik Abduh, some conclude that PAS and Umno are working together in this elections. From this picture, people are wondering what Najib is discussing with PAS leaders. Was it the economy or 1MDB? [picture] Some of PAS’ grassroot members are frustrated as they still hold onto the late mandate from Nik Aziz. Nik Aziz who said that “when one befriends Umno, there will be no other who will befriend him as Allah will only help those who are honest to fight for Islam”.[picture] 

6.   You listen to Hadi and his speeches which, to an ordinary man sounds quiet strange where mostly in support the government.

7.   PAS wants to have Islamic tax on savings, maybe to replace the GST.  I hope PAS has the experts in taxation law so that they can advise how to implement this. lf the government tax the people on savings, it means that there will be double tax because only those who have money save. And these people has already been taxed. If this tax is implemented, will people save their money in our banks and financial institutions or keep it overseas?

8.  Hadi’s statements do not help PAS. Based on his statements, PAS may even lose Kelantan, and Tengku Razaleigh is determined to win Kelantan for BN. However, my journalist friends told me that PAS may retain Kelantan as the Kelantanese hate Umno. But recently, Rafizi Ramli said that things have changed and PH is gaining ground. People from Kelantan came to see me and told me that PH may have a chance. We can see the split in PAS with Nik Omar joining PH.  In fact all three of their past presidents’ sons have left PAS to join PH.

9.  The close relationship between the two party leaders confuse members. Both agree DAP is a threat to the Malays. This stand is illogical. Agong is Malay, Rulers are Malays. The PM and Menteri Besar are Malays. Majority of rakyat are Malays. By 2030, the numbers of Malays and Bumiputera are expected to increase further but the non-Bumiputera will see reduction. We know that this is just to frighten the rural people and their statements don’t make any sense.


Story kat sini...

Syabas to the Navy Chief.  I hope the Airforce, Army and Police Chiefs will also make a same statement to their personnel.

The sad thing is our Navy is so small. I believe less than 30,000 personnel.

Message from Laksamana Tan Sri Ahmad Kamarulzaman to TLDM

We need the Army and the Police Chiefs to speak up like the Navy Chief. The Army and the Police are the largest uniformed groups in the country. 

N'theless this announcement by the Navy Chief is quite unprecedented. 


However there was some confusion earlier when it was reported by M'kini and other media that the Armed Forces Chief said something to the effect that he supported the super m_ron.  Here be the news heading :


The Armed Forces Chief later clarified that his loyalty was to the King and country etc.

My own position is that the Armed Forces Chief does not need a barber.

Akhir kalam, syabas again to the Navy Chief.  Thank you for speaking up. Aye Aye Sir. - ostb

Mohamad Sabu di Flat Danau Kota

We Penang lang love what we have now...

Image may contain: 1 person, text
Sembang dah macam berada di pentas Prhimpunan Agong UMNO 
dan seolah2 Najib ada di sebelah..

No automatic alt text available.

Image may contain: one or more people and text

Image may contain: 1 person
cheers.

03 May 2018

Cakap berbelit2,cam ni nak jadi PM...

Presiden PAS Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang menafikan bahawa parti itu pernah i mengkafirkan umat Islam lain tetapi sebaliknya mendakwa ini dilakukan oleh ahli partinya yang melompat menyertai Umno.

Katanya, PAS tidak berhak berbuat demikian kerana itu bukan ajaran Islam yang sebenarnya.

“Kita ajak dan beritahu orang Islam, kita mesti percaya pada Islam. Dia kata kita mengkafirkan orang, bukan kerja kita mengkafirkan orang.

“PAS tidak mengkafirkan si anu dengan si anu, sia anu dengan si anu. (PAS tak kata) Umno kafir orang tu kafir, PAS tak kata begitu.

“Memang ada orang dalam PAS yang cakap begini, orang PAS yang cakap begini masuk Umno belaka tak ada dalam PAS. Yang cakap keras-keras tu pergi ke Umno. Kerana dalam PAS kita ajar batas-batas iman dan kufur,” kata Abdul Hadi dalam ceramahnya di Markas PAS Kuah Langkawi, malam semalam. - mk

Dulu siapa yang kata dulu, WAJIB sokong DAP dan HARAM sokong Umno hingga kiamat pada 8 Ogos 2012 dan siapa pulak yang kata PAS dapat untung kerjasama dengan DAP pada 13 Oktober 2012 walau pun dia tahu DAP tolak hudud kalau bukan si Lebai Tua Hadi Awang ni?? Pada aku si lebai tua ni tak lebih daripada menjadi ayatollah kepada PAS hingga penyokongnya begitu taksub dan rela disesatkan dengan ajaran SESAT dia tu. - Nordin Kcd

Inilah pemimpin yang bercelaru otaknya dan tiada pendirian,Hardy juga tiada track record Yang baik dalam mentakbir Negeri,pagi cakap lain petang pula cakap lain.Dia jauh lebih nyayuk dari Tun Dr.Mahathir Muhammad. - Shafiek Abdat

Alhamdulillah setelah bermimpi bertemu Nabi Muhammad SAW dan berjumpa Almarhum TGNA dlm keadaan kaki sebelah takda(kononnyer) maka lebai Hadi tak lagi mengKAFIRkan UMNO. - Shahizah Amera

Mimpi lagi lebai Hadi ni.Dulu masa amanat dia berpuluh tahun mengkafirkan org UMNO dia dah lupa gitu je.Sampai org mati di Memali. - Zeez Aziz 

Haha lidah bercabang. Macam tu ka ulamak. Hari ni dah tersepit baru nak cakap. Amanah hang dah jadi rekod. Tak boleh padam dahhhh. Lidah berbelit. - Abu Kamira


Penyokong2MO1 dan Hadi 
adalah seperti orang atheis...

Received this via WhatsApp. It is going viral. A philosophical sort of piece... 

Bagaimana orang Melayu yang mengaku beragama boleh mewajarkan sokongan mereka terhadap Pencuri? Adakah mereka masih buta atau ragu-ragu terhadap bukti-bukti jelas yang menunjukkan bahawa dia adalah seorang pencuri yang terbesar di dunia pada hari ini? Adakah agama mereka mengajar umat memilih seorang pencuri sebagai pemimpin dan tidak mengapa untuk bersubahat dengannya?

Jangan terkelabu dengan keadaan di mana MO1 tidak didakwa di mahkamah sebagai alasan untuk berkata bahawa dia tidak bersalah dari jenayah mencuri. Duit RM2.6 billion yang dicuri olehnya dari 1MDB telah sahih masuk ke dalam akaun peribadinya. Bukti ini sudah jelas. Malah pencuri MO1 pun terpaksa mengaku tentang perkara ini walaupun pada awalnya dia menafikannya. Jangan pula kita berpura-pura tidak tahu tentang ini dan meletakkan sikap berbaik sangka di tempat yang salah alamatnya.

Si Pencuri terlepas dari dakwaan jenayah ini tidak lain hanya kerana P__uam Negara (PN) dan Ketua P___s Negara  telah bersubahat dengan kemungkaran ini. Semua orang yang celik dan waras tahu bahawa PN dan KPN telah menutup bukti-bukti yang boleh mensabitkan kesalahan jenayah MO1. Namun tiada siapa boleh menutup bangkai gajah yang terlalu besar ini dan bau pekungnya yang menusuk hidung.

Masalahnya ialah terdapat ramai orang Melayu masih tidak takut kepada Tuhan dan tidak yakin terhadap Hari Pertemuan denganNya di akhirat kelak. Janji Tuhan tentang Hari Pengadilan mungkin dirasakan hanya sebagai sebuah cerita dongeng. Jangankan penyokong tegar Umno yang ambil sikap begini, ahli Pas pun dua kali lima juga.

Ini kerana Pas di bawah pimpinan Hadi Awang secara terang-terang adalah sekutu kepada MO1 dan Umno. Mereka bertanding di banyak kerusi Parlimen dan ADUN bukan untuk menang. Sebaliknya kerana mahu pecahkan undi orang Melayu supaya undi yang akan diberi kepada calun-calun Pakatan Harapan (PH) tidak cukup untuk mengalahkan Umno. 

Video Hadi memberi ceramah secara terbuka tentang kerjasama Pas dengan Umno untuk membentuk sebuah kerajaan bersama sudah lama tular. Tonton video berikut...
Di bahagian manakah dalam ajaran agamanya yang Hadi ambil sebagai sandaran untuk mewajarkan orang Melayu bersekongkol dengan seorang pencuri khazanah rakyat yang termahsyur di dunia sekarang? Agama jenis apakah sebenarnya yang dibawa oleh Hadi dan Pas?

Persoalan yang paling dasar sekarang ialah bagaimana orang Melayu boleh menutup mata mengenepikan tanda-tanda dan bukti-bukti jelas dan sahih bahawa MO1 adalah seorang pencuri? Perbuatan ini tidak ubah seperti sikap Atheis yang menolak kewujudan Tuhan!

Seperti semua orang lain, orang-orang yang berfahaman Atheis juga melihat berbagai tanda-tanda kebesaran Tuhan yang terpampang di alam semesta ini. Tetapi pada masa yang sama, mereka menolak kewujudan Tuhannya. 

Ini berlaku kerana otak dan jiwa mereka sakit, lalu mereka jadi degil tidak mahu mengaku bahawa Tuhan itu ujud. Bagi mereka, selagi Tuhan tidak kelihatan dengan mata kepala mereka sendiri, selagi itulah mereka akan tetap menolak kewujudan Tuhan. Mata hati mereka buta sehingga mereka bertindak songsang terhadap fitrah manusia yang dicipta dengan keinginan semulajadi untuk menyembah Tuhan kepada segala-gala yang terdapat di alam semesta ini.

Begitulah juga dengan sikap penyokong-penyokong Pencuri MO1. Tanda-tanda yang menjadi bukti kukuh bahawa dia telah mencuri berbillion-billion ringgit wang rakyat amat jelas dan ketara. Tetapi mereka memberi alasan bahawa selagi MO1 tidak didakwa di mahkamah dan tidak didapati bersalah, maka mereka tidak percaya bahawa MO1 telah mencuri. 

Padahal bukti wang sebanyak RM2.6 billion yang masuk ke dalam akaun peribadi MO1 telah jelas terpampang dan diketahui oleh seluruh dunia. Satu-satunya sebab mengapa dia tidak didakwa di mahkmah atas kesalahan ini hanyalah kerana PN dan KPN telah bersubahat untuk membuang kes ini tanpa sebab yang munasabah. 

Jadi apakah bezanya sekarang di antara penyokong-penyokong pencuri MO1 dengan Atheis dari segi cara pemikiran mereka? Jelas bahawa mereka mempunyai persamaan mengenai betapa sakit dan rosak jiwa dan mental mereka kerana sanggup menolak kebenaran yang nyata.

Adakah mereka ingin kembali kepada Tuhan dalam keadaan fitrah mereka yang kotor sebegini? Tidakkah mereka telah lakukan satu penghinaan dan kekufuran besar terhadap nikmat akal yang Tuhan telah kurniakan kepada manusia? 

Dan yang lebih malang lagi ialah Hadi dan Pas semakin menambah kepada kesesatan ini melalui tindakan mereka mengajak kita berkerjasama untuk mengekalkan seorang pencuri. 

Agama sesat yang mereka bawa hanya sekadar untuk duduk dilabel. Tetapi dari segi menjadikannya sebuah agama fitrah yang indah mempraktikkan nilai-nilai sejagat yang luhur hingga ia menjadi tarikan bagi seluruh umat manusia terpikat untuk ingin mendampinginya, Hadi dan Pas telah gagal dengan sebesar-besarnya.



Agama tidak sepatutnya dijadikan hanya sekadar laungan retorik, slogan dan label yang membingungkan rakyat sehingga mereka naik menyampah kepada agama. Sebaliknya, ukuran kejayaan agama yang sebenar ialah apabila berbondong-bondong rakyat di negara kita memeluk agama kita secara sukarela.

Yang pasti ialah apabila orang Melayu tetap menyokong seorang pencuri untuk dikekalkan sebagai Perdana Menteri Malaysia, kewibawaan dan kesucian agama sudah tercemar dari perspektif orang-orang bukan Islam kerana ia gagal memanifestasikan hakikatnya sebagai agama yang benar dan adil.

Islam di Malaysia kini kelihatan bagaikan sebuah agama kartun yang tidak layak dianuti oleh orang-orang yang waras. 

Orang yang tidak beragama pun tahu bahawa adalah sesuatu yang tidak masuk akal bagi orang yang berfikiran waras, dan lebih-lebih lagi jika ia beragama, untuk memilih seorang pencuri supaya dikekalkan sebagai ketua negara secara sukarela melalui kaedah demokrasi. Tetapi agama yang dipraktikkan di Malaysia melanggar nilai kemanusiaan yang paling asas ini. Lalu bagaimanakah kebenaran agama hendak dipertahankan jika begini cara agama dipraktikkan?

Dalam konteks yang sedang dibicarakan sekarang, mungkin semua penyokong-penyokong Pencuri MO1 bukan Atheis dalam ertikata menolak kewujudan Tuhan. Tetapi yang tidak boleh dinafikan ialah cara pemikiran dan sikap mereka saling tidak tumpah seperti orang Atheis yang kufur terhadap nikmat akal yang Tuhan kurniakan kepadanya. - tok misai



Even my friends now refused 
to lend their aircraft...

1. The Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia (CAAM) and Vista Jet have refuted my accusations that there was sabotage involved when the plane I was going to fly to Langkawi had problems with its front wheel.

2. But they admit there was some leakage of fluid from the front wheel which means that the front wheel cannot steer the plane.

3. This is a very serious thing, because it may result in the plane going off track when taking off or landing. But fortunately, the pilot discovered the leak before the plane took off, and told me that he cannot fly in that condition.

4. He told me he would try to repair it but after some time, he said that it cannot be repaired.

5. The statement that another plane was offered is sheer nonsense, because after I found the plane could not fly, we tried to borrow from friends with private aircraft.

6. I contacted three friends. Normally they would lend me their aircraft. But this time they refused to lend their aircraft, and one of them indicated that he is under pressure not to lend me his aircraft.

7. I also read that the plane was my private jet. That is also a lie. I do not have RM2.6 billion in my account to spend on a private jet or a yacht.

8. Neither did the CAAM do anything nor did it provide any alternative plane.

9. So combining the two facts – that the plane is damaged and cannot fly and I cannot get my friends to lend me their plane – it is logical to believe that there is a deliberate attempt to stop me from going to Langkawi. If I had wasted more time I might not have been able to be nominated on the 28th of April.

10. Fortunately, a friend had chartered a plane to go to Singapore. I persuaded him to let the plane take me to Langkawi. That’s how I got a plane to Langkawi without any help at all from CAAM.

11. I have flown thousands of times in private jets; there has never been any serious incident that forced the plane to be grounded. This is the first time I have to experience damage to the front wheel of the airplane. At other times engine may not be functioning well, and they could be repaired in time, but this damage to the front wheel of the plane is very serious damage.

12. And it could have stopped me from flying to Langkawi. That this should happen on this occasion is very significant. I’ve been flying in the same leased plane from the same charter company many, many times. I never had any problem.

13. But I am aware that one of the ways for BN to stop Pakatan Harapan to win the election is by stopping people from being named as candidates. There are other attempts of course, where several of the Pakatan Harapan candidates could not be registered or nominated as candidates.

14. For example not having the Election Commission pass, which is not necessary at all. I have never used the pass before and it is enough for you to show a blue Identity Card for you to be nominated and named as a candidate.

15. But obviously, there were deliberate attempts to stop an opposition candidate from being nominated so that the Negeri Sembilan Menteri Besar wins uncontested.

16. And there’s the ease of Tian Chua (Pakatan Harapan’s candidate for the Batu parliamentary seat) who has every right to be named as a candidate but again, on a flimsy reason was unable to be nominated.

17. When this happened to me and my plane tampered with, to me it is a very serious matter. The denial by the CAAM is not the result of a proper investigation. It is just a denial to say that what I’ve said is not true. I’m not accusing the CAAM of doing anything wrong. I know the CAAM does not have a very tight security all over the country to ensure that planes are not tampered with.

18. That is a very big job to the CAAM, but we are dealing with a government party which is known to use all kinds of tricks in order to win the election. And one of the tricks, of course, is to stop me from being nominated, and especially me, because I happened to be the leader of the opposition, and if I am not nominated as a candidate, this will have a negative effect on Pakatan Harapan.

19. So I maintain my belief that the plane was deliberately tampered with to stop me from going to Langkawi. - chedet
Sidang Media - Tarikh:02.05.2018 Jam:1.30 Ptg.
Kandungan...

- Arulkanda kata 1MDB disiasat satu fitnah.
- Saman Khairy Jamaluddin isu halang calon PH di Rembau. 
- Tuduhan TS Shahrir Samad PH musnahkan institusi Melayu. 



Potong gambaq Dr.M tak patut...
Story kat SINI dan SINI  

Kalu menang pasai apa bicara mula April 2019?


No automatic alt text available.
Image may contain: 4 people, people smiling

cheers.


02 May 2018

Dr.M - Najib terkencing tengok gambag saya...

Gambar saya hensem ni Najib takut...

Gambaq Dr.M SPR potong...

Anggota penguatkuasa Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya bertindak memotong buang gambar mantan perdana menteri Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad dari papan iklan kempen kawasan Parlimen Ayer Hitam.

“Kami diberitahu bahawa papan iklan kami tidak boleh mempunyai gambar Mahathir dan arahan Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya adalah supaya gambar Mahathir dipotong,” kata calon HARAPAN, Liew Chin Tong, dilaporkan Malaysiakini.

Saksikan video penuh kejadian terbabit di laman Facebook rasmi beliau:

Pengerusi DAP Johor itu juga memberitahu bahawa SPR turut mengarahkannya supaya mengeluarkan atau tidak menaikkan semua poster, sepanduk atau kain rentang yang menampilkan gambar Mahathir. - Roketkini



The PAS DNA in Amanah worries Mat Sabu


Abang doakan kejayaan,Nicky Abduh 
balas dgn kecaman,"Air Mani Terbuang"...

Nik Omar mendoakan kejayaan adiknya di Bachok tetapi dijawab kamu telah menikam jantung ibu.

Doa calon Pakatan Harapan (PH) bagi Dun Chempaka, Nik Omar Nik Abdul Aziz agar adiknya berjaya di Parlimen Bachok sebaliknya dibalas Nik Abduh dengan nada sindiran dan kecaman.

Dalam kenyataan Nik Abduh yang didakwa daripada mereka sekeluarga, beliau memberitahu ibu mereka, Datin Hajjah Tuan Sabariah Tuan Ishak akan berkempen untuk dirinya dan pada masa sama membantu kempen Pas di Dun Chempaka.

Mengundang kecaman orang ramai sejurus dimuat naik di Facebook, penyandang Parlimen Pasir Mas yang sudah ‘ditendang’ pada PRU-14 ini berkata, hati ibunya terluka sebanyak dua kali.

Pertama, jelasnya, ketika adik-beradiknya Nik Adli ditahan di bawah ISA dan terbaharu apabila Nik Omar bertanding di Dun Chempaka.

Menganggap keputusan Nik Omar bertanding mewakili PH pada penamaan calon, 28 April lalu sebagai “kemalangan”, Nik Abduh memohon maaf kepada jentera Pas di seluruh negara dan seluruh rakyat Malaysia.

Image may contain: text

“Ia sesuatu yang amat sukar. Bonda kini memilih untuk berehat beberapa hari bagi merawat luka hatinya yang dalam akibat tembakan yang dilepaskan semenjak lebih 30 tahun lepas oleh seorang lelaki bernama Ikram.

“Dua hari lepas (penamaan calon 28 April), tembakan itu tepat singgah ke jantung bonda.

“Ini adalah tembakan kedua yang terpaksa ditanggung oleh bonda selepas tembakan pertama yang meranapkan jiwanya oleh Tun Dr Mahathir lebih 15 tahun lepas apabila salah seorang anaknya di-ISA-kan.

“Tun dan Ikram itu hari ini bersama-sama bersatu bekerja keras meruntuhkan kerajaan Islam negeri Kelantan di bawah pemerintahan Pas,” ujarnya.

Sehubungan itu, beliau menasihatkan abang sulungnya supaya membaca kisah agung khalifah Islam yang dibai’ahkan oleh umat Islam selepas kematian Yazid bin Muawiyah, iaitu Abdullah Ibn al-Zubayr.


Nik Abduh juga mengingatkan Nik Omar memahami fiqh al-sahabiy al-jalil dalam memahami peranan seorang ibu dalam politik dan jihad.

“Ibu adalah menara kehidupan. Jangan bicara pasal ayahanda jika bonda tiada di sisi.

“Siapa ayahanda tanpa seorang bonda yang paling memahami pahit getir kehidupan seorang suami bergelar pejuang. Siapa kita tanpa bonda? Sekadar air mani terbuang hina..,” tulisnya.

Ungkapan terakhir itu kemudiannya menyebabkan orang ramai menasihati Nik Abduh dan membandingkan nilai akhlak dan sikap berlapang dada Nik Omar yang jauh lebih baik berbanding adiknya. - f/bk

Trial Date Set For Hadi Awang Case 
Vs Sarawak Report...

A London High Court Judge today set a provisional date for a full trial of Hadi Awang’s case against Sarawak Report for ten days lasting from 1st-12 April 2019. 

Justice Dingemans said that he felt there were many inter-related and over-lapping issues, including the public interest surrounding the articles written by Sarawak Report and Sarawak Report’s rights to report on political matter, that would inevitably impinge on the issue of whether or not Hadi had grounds to bring the case in the first place. 

Political parties cannot sue in the UK and Sarawak Report had petitioned for a quick preliminary trial to determine whether it was really Hadi or PAS who was behind the case to silence Sarawak Report on the issue of money flowing from UMNO into the politicial party.

This would have speeded up and simplified the process, possibly ending it within a matter of a few short weeks and cutting down the expense of the trial by several million ringgit (the cost of libel trials in the UK is high). 

However, Hadi had resisted the speedy resolution and the judge agreed that Sarawak Report’s counter-claim for harassment and defamation also complicated matters and he said he felt that there were many aspects to the matter which would in the end make it easier to reach a judgement if all the issues were before the court at the same time. 

This includes Sarawak Report’s ‘stay application’ to halt Hadi’s claim on the basis of abuses by parties linked to the plaintiff and also threats to witnesses in Malaysia.

Procedural Application 

The half day hearing related to this one procedural application only by Sarawak Report.  Claims being promulgated by PAS, alleging that there were ‘5 applications defeated‘ and even the astounding allegation that Hadi has ‘won the case’ are false. 

In the light of new strengthened evidence that has emerged, in particular a recording believed to be of PAS leader Nik Abduh admitting to receiving money from UMNO and admitting ‘everyone’ senior in the party has also taken money for ‘Islamic purposes’, Sarawak Report had already withdrawn its original application relating to its so-called ‘truth defence’. 


Image result for hadi n claire

Justice Dingemans asked if Sarawak Report plans to bring back a revised and strengthened ‘truth defence’ and Sarawak Report’s lawyers confirmed they will be doing so and that scientific evidence is currently being finalised, determining the authenticity of the recording.  That issue was accepted by the court.

The judge also noted that Sarawak Report will also now return to raise the issues in its earlier ‘stay application’, which were also previously suspended for the purposes of today’s single application to narrow down the trial to a preliminary determination on whether Hadi could claim his own reputation had been implicated. 

Sarawak Report had already agreed to cover any costs involved in revising and stregthening those core defences.  Hadi’s lawyers attempted to claim £69,000 for the inconveniences incurred, which the Judge ruled as being extraordinarily high.  He slashed the demand to £40,000. During the procedings 

Justice Dingemans demanded that Hadi’s lawyers inform the court what their total bills have amounted to so far in this case – the sums that Hadi/PAS will have already paid.  Carter Ruck’s barrister admitted these stand at £305,250 to date, meaning that Hadi has paid out RM1,646,434 ringgit, before the pre-trial work even gets going.

Sarawak Report’s costs have been £200,000.  Hadi claimed yesterday that ‘wealthy members of PAS’ are funding his case, for which he has hired one of London’s most expensive legal firms.  Sarawak Report has been backed by well-wishers, who have contributed to a crowd funding exercise to support freedom of reporting. 

The judge demanded both sides to participate in a case management exercise to ensure that the case now moves on towards a full trial.  The next stages will involve extensive disclosure by both sides. 

There was no comment whatsoever by the judge on the merits of the case on either side during what was merely a procedural hearing.  If supporters of PAS are claiming that ‘Hadi has won’ any aspect of the case, their leader needs to understand that the fun has only just begun. 

So far, he has won nothing except a guaranteed full trial that will examine every detail of PAS’s relationship with UMNO between now and April next year. - SR

Saman fitnah Hadi terhadap Sarawak Report belum mula lagi.







Image may contain: one or more people, people standing, suit and text
Image may contain: text
cheers.