Makan free punya pasai,isu2 skandal habaih melayang...

Sikap rakyat Malaysia di musim hari raya yang baru berlalu menyerlahkan rasa tidak peduli mereka dengan pelbagai salah laku, dan ia sesuatu yang harus dikaji secara mendalam, kata bekas menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri Datuk Zaid Ibrahim.

Zaid terkilan begitu ramai masih teruja dengan makanan percuma di rumah terbuka Aidilfitri di kediaman rasmi perdana menteri Seri Perdana, Putrajaya.

“Perasaan sayang mereka kepada PM dan isterinya adalah fenomena luar biasa yang mengelirukan orang asing. Ia memerlukan kajian mendalam. Pemerhatian rapi mengenai sikap orang Malaysia di sebalik nafsu tunai dan makan percuma, akan memberikan petanda keputusan pilihan raya akan datang,” kata Zaid.

Menurutnya, kehadiran ramai di rumah terbuka dianjurkan Datuk Seri Najib Razak itu menunjukkan umat Islam sudah tidak kisah mengenai salah guna kuasa “selagi mendapat makanan percuma”.

“Mereka marah bila saya cadangkan supaya juruterbang tidak mempelawa penumpang berdoa di waktu kecemasan,” kata Zaid, yang baru-baru ini dikecam kerana mempersoalkan juruterbang penerbangan AirAsia X D7237 dari Perth ke Kuala Lumpur, yang menyuruh penumpang berdoa ketika pesawat bergegar teruk selepas mengalami kerosakan salah satu enjinnya pada 25 Jun lalu.

“Mereka menuduh saya mengabaikan Tuhan. Saya tertanya-tanya sama ada label itu lebih sesuai terhadap mereka yang tidak percaya laporan Jabatan Kehakiman Amerika Syarikat tetapi sukakan makanan percuma,” tulis Zaid dalam blognya hari ini.

Beliau menganggarkan sekurang-kurangnya RM5 juta dibelanjakan untuk menganjurkan Rumah Terbuka Aidilfitri peringkat Kabinet di Seri Perdana pada 25 Jun lalu.

Sambil berharap acara besar-besaran seperti itu tidak ditiru pembangkang kelak melainkan “mereka bayar daripada poket sendiri”, Zaid tidak menafikan ia adalah gambaran populariti Najib dan bukan makanan semata-mata.

“Saya kagum, ketika pelbagai skandal dan ‘berita palsu’ dilontarkan ke arahnya, beliau masih disayangi dan dihormati. Saya dengan ini menilai semula ramalan keputusan pilihan raya berdasarkan sambutan besar di rumah terbuka itu.

“Mungkin saya perlu menilai jiwa rakyat Malaysia amnya, kesemua mereka, daripada rakyat biasa kepada profesor universiti,” kata Zaid.

Zaid turut kesal dengan kandungan khutbah hari raya yang masih mengulangi perkara sama.

“Khutbah raya di masjid yang saya kunjungi tidak langsung menyentuh mengenai sikap ummah. Ia bercakap mengenai kekuasaan dan kasih sayang Allah, sesuatu yang kita semua tahu,” katanya.- fmt

Hadi serlahkan kejahilan 

tentang prosiding DOJ...

Surat terbuka Presiden PAS, yang juga Ahli Parlimen Marang, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang telah mencemarkan nama baik seorang ahli legislatif dan kedudukannya sebagai antara ulamak dunia.

Tuduhan kononnya kuasa asing cuba untuk masuk campur hal ehwal negara jelas disebabkan kekurangan maklumat beliau atau kemungkinan mengikut skrip biasa UMNO/BN sebelum ini bagi mengalih tumpuan isu sebenar.

Hakikatnya, DOJ menggunakan bidang kuasa mereka terhadap prosedur kleptokrasi (perompak kekayaan negara) untuk mendapatkan kembali wang yang dicuri daripada 1MDB yang dibelanjakan di Amerika Syarikat, sepatutnya Hadi merasakan ini adalah baik bagi rakyat Malaysia, sebagai penerima manfaat utama.

Saya yakin tiada rakyat Malaysia yang waras mahukan campur tangan negara asing dalam urusan negara. Namun membantu negara asing untuk menangkap perompak besar dari negara kita yang merompak di negara asing dengan menggunakan kekayaan negara kita, patut diberi bantuan untuk siasatan demi menjaga maruah negara dan mengembalikan duit negara yang dirompak.

Surat terbuka beliau secara tidak langsung telah menjadikan Presiden PAS sebagai pembela kepada kleptokrasi kerajaan Najib.

Tujuan mereka yang sama waktu dengannya hanya satu, iaitu untuk meraih simpati pengundi dengan melemparkan sensitiviti perkauman, agama dan kini anti-Barat pula.

Naratif baru diperlukan di mana sebagai seorang Muslim dan Melayu, kita mesti tegas dalam isu rompakan besar negara ini sebab ia boleh menghancurkan negara.

Ketegasan ini bukan bermakna kita tunduk kepada DOJ atau kuasa asing tetapi sebagai prinsip utama menyelamatkan kekayaan negara dari dirompak oleh pemimpin negara yang kita pilih.

Kita menolak campur tangan asing tapi kita mesti menangkap para perompak yang mencuri kekayaan negara!

Tindakan sebahagian para mufti dan pemimpin agama seperti presiden PAS akan menjadi penghalang rakyat untuk menundukkan perompakan mega kekayaan negara yang bermaharajalela.

Jika inilah sikap mereka, rakyat perlu membawa mesej yang tegas menolak mentaliti terkepung ini.

Justeru, negara Malaysia perlu kepimpinan yang bersih dari rasuah, berwawasan, berhati rakyat dan membina semula negara ini dengan semangat yang baru. Hanya dengan itu Malaysia akan menjadi trajektori perubahan dan pembaharuan tulen yang kita semua citakan dan harapkan. – Dr Mujahid Yusof Rawa,Roketkini.com

Dr M: Only an idiot will believe 

I can influence the DOJ...

1. I’m proud because someone said I can get order the United States Department of Justice to do something. If I can order an agency of the American government, the culprits would have been arrested a long time ago and charged for stealing billions of dollars.  The punishment they deserve would have been meted out long ago. 

2. Unfortunately I am just a former Prime Minister of Malaysia who has no teeth, no influence and too away from the powers of corridor to be able to direct any government agency of the United States, or even a Malaysian government agency.

3. What the United States Department of Justice does is act on those involved with money laundering in the United States, not in Malaysia. The law on money-laundering in the United States is extremely tight, unlike in Malaysia, where the government is satisfied if the RM2.6 billion in the Prime Minister’s personal account is said to be an Arab donation. The parties who were questioned don’t even acknowledge it is an offence to money launder so much money. 

4. The DoJ’s detailed and precise accusations include the pink diamond given by Jho Low to the wife of Malaysian Official 1 (who is the Prime Minister following the acknowledgment of BN’s Strategic Communications Director, who is also Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Abdul Rahman Dahlan),  who is Rosmah Mansor .

5. Jho Low and Riza Aziz should go to the United States to counter the charges of stealing 1MDB money. But they did not dare. The Malay adage says, “brave because it is true, afraid because it is wrong.” They hide in China and Malaysia. At the same time it becomes a confirmation that all charges of the DoJ are true. 

6. A beautiful Australian woman, (Miranda Kerr) and actor Leonardo DiCaprio have returned the gifts given to them by Jho Low. When will Rosmah and other corrupt recipients in Malaysia return the money stolen from 1MDB, to Malaysians. But they are thick-skinned, shameless. When accused of stealing, all of them, Najib and UMNO leaders, just smile.

7. Therefore, they implicate me, a person without power, of having the ability to order a superpower like the US to make a false report against Najib, who moreover is a friend of Obama and counts Trump as a golf partner. 

8. Only the stupid will believe. Effective is the bran (bribe) that is being stuffed into the ears, eyes and mouths by Najib, king of cash. - chedet

DOJ dan Saya

Warning From US Secretary of State 

to 1Malaysia...

Press Statement
Rex W. Tillerson 
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
July 4, 2017


The United States strongly condemns North Korea's launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile. Testing an ICBM represents a new escalation of the threat to the United States, our allies and partners, the region, and the world.

Global action is required to stop a global threat. 

Any country that hosts North Korean guest workers, provides any economic or military benefits, or fails to fully implement UN Security Council resolutions is aiding and abetting a dangerous regime. 

All nations should publicly demonstrate to North Korea that there are consequences to their pursuit of nuclear weapons. We intend to bring North Korea's provocative action before the UN Security Council and enact stronger measures to hold the DPRK accountable.

The United States seeks only the peaceful denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula and the end of threatening actions by North Korea. As we, along with others, have made clear, we will never accept a nuclear-armed North Korea.

The President and his national security team are continuing to assess the situation in close coordination with our allies and partners.

Well after the assasination of that Kim Sum Ting fellow at the KLIA, Malaysia has now begun imposing visas on North Koreans. Too late. 

Before this no visa was required for North Koreans.  There were hundreds if not thousands of North Koreans inside our country.  (News is they have now all left Malaysia). This is what happens if we treat our own country like a tong sampah - where all the trash from all over the world is allowed to come and stay here.

As a result what do we get? Endless trouble. You allow North Koreans into Malaysia without visas and what happens? They send their assassins here and killed that Kim Sun Ting fellow at the KLIA. (By the way what has happened to the case? Is Bukit Aman too tied up with all the Ops Gopi leaks that are now coming out in Sarawak Report? Sudah mati akal? Dont know what to do in the office now?)

You allow Zakir Naik into the country and what happens? All the religious psychos got excited and started behaving weird. It has only caused so much controbersy. Now Zakir Naik (who is banned from the UK, US and other countries for terrorism links) is under threat of arrest and prosecution in India. 

Malaysia is a tong sampah.

We just returned from nine days in Italy. We flew from KLIA to Abu Dhabi then to Rome. Exact opposite on the way back. From Abu Dhabi to Rome we saw all normal people (Arabs, Indians, Chinese, Asians, Europeans) headed towards Rome.

On the return trip from Abu Dhabi to Kuala Lumpur we saw all types of beardos, Arab burka-ninjas, hantus and religious psychos boarding the flight. There were many of those psycho beardo types, with their huge bushy beards, dirty jubahs and long skirts, white skull caps, above ankle pajamas and sleeping gowns.

While boarding the flight in Abu Dhabi, one Arab fellow with a huge bushy beard, dirty sleeping gown type dress and white skull cap created a big fuss with the air hostesses. He said that the seating arrangement separated him from his wife and two kids. So he wanted the other passengers on the plane  to switch seats so that he could sit together with his family !! Punyalah kurang ajar.

These are the followers of a satanic religion who think they have more rights than other human beings.The moron came and harrassed a Chinese family if they could switch seats with him! They replied they were also a family and wanted to sit together.

Then he asked my son who said the same thing. We had booked our flight tickets a few months ago and even picked our seating arrangements (all done online). The fellow is now traipsing around Kuala Lumpur. We allow all sorts of this trash into our country.  Malaysia is the tong sampah international. - ostb

Kelonggaran syarat lulus BM dibatal...

Injunksi hentikan SPR kemukakan laporan PM

Story kat SINI dan SINI  

Setelah 104 kali 'Selasa depan' berlalu...

Pak tiri dapat derma anak tiri dapat hadiah...

Hampir 40 tahun Gerakan-BN memerintah Penang dulu.

Pernah kah universiti2 di Penang beri yuran percuma?

Jakim urges dog lover to repent

JAKIM kecewa dengan gadis dan seekor anjing 
tapi diam bila lelaki perangai macam "anjing"...

(JAKIM is upset of over a girl and a dog 

instead of men being "dogs")

Story kat sini...

Apa salahnya puan ni bercuti guna ambulan...

cheers.

Bullying, a recurring problem...

The months of May and June will remain etched in our memories, as they amplified a tragically phenomenal development in our youths – bullying. A cowardly act that had resulted in the untimely death of two youngsters in the prime of their youth. The expectations of the deceased’s parents, their relatives and friends were dashed when the duo died without regaining  consciousness after being brutalised by their own friends. 

Both died on hospital beds, not somewhere more comforting, and neither lived long enough to experience the joy of adulthood. How they ended up in hospitals, at extreme ends of the peninsula, one in Serdang and the other in Penang, is a story worth telling and the reasons worth examining. 

Zulfarhan Osman Zulkarnain, 21, was a naval cadet undergoing training at the National Defence University Malaysia. The campus, incidentally, is located within the 200-acre Royal Military College in Sungei Besi, Kuala Lumpur. It is the very place where I received my military training in the late 1960s.

The Royal Military College has been around since 1952. It was then known as the Federation Military College and was located at 5th Mile, Port Dickson where the Army Academy now stands. In 1961, the college was moved to its present site in Sungei Besi cantonment. 

This institution provides secondary education and basic military training for potential army officers. Navy and air force cadets were trained in Dartmouth and Cranwell, UK respectively. The Royal Military College is our equivalent of the renowned, Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, in England.

The need to provide better qualified officers for an expanding armed forces necessitated the formation of a new wing – the Armed Forces Academy – it was established in 1995. In 2006 the academy became a full-fledged university. That was how the National Defence University Malaysia came into existence. Essentially, it is a tri-service military academy that provides military and tertiary education for junior officers of the army, navy and air force.

I am often asked if ragging is prevalent at RMC and in military establishments. I will be lying if I say otherwise. It does happen. Its intensity and frequency, however, is dependent upon the officer-in-charge.

We were ragged at RMC by our seniors but took things in our strides as we knew our turn would come. Things turned ugly when one of our juniors decided to report our activities to the commandant. He provided photographic evidence (smartphone was unknown then) and the culprits, including yours truly, were duly punished for our shenanigans. It stopped for a while but continued years later.

Although I disapprove of ragging, it is an important aspect of an officer’s upbringing. It instils in him the strength to withstand hardships and make him a well-rounded person. I speak for myself after having endured physical deprivation and mental anguish as a greenhorn joining a military outfit. 

You will be shouted at and be told to do things you never expected. But it is all in the game, and how well you take it depends on your resolve. Ragging, in essence, made me a man. And I say the same of my juniors, subordinates and students who are in positions of authority in the army today.

When I was an instructor at the Officer Cadet School in Port Dickson (1979 to 1982) ragging took place in my battalion, but it was supervised. None of my cadets complained when being bundled up in the night and forced to take a dip in the sea, dressed in combat gears.

In the case of Zulfarhan, I suspect supervision was poor or perhaps non-existent. I wonder how his tormentors could take him out of the college grounds for treatment at a clinic in Bangi and kept him away for an extended period of time. Something is very wrong with the institution’s security system. 

My guess is, the huge number of students, in excess of 2500, prevents the university’s authority from exercising complete control, unlike during my time. A board of inquiry, surprisingly, was never convened within the required 21-day period, as stipulated in Army Act 1972. This is gross negligence, and the culprits should be made to answer.  

Poor Nhaveen, 18, on the other hand, was tortured and brutalised for being what he was – an effeminate kid on the block. You cannot change someone’s sexual orientation. And those who feel that to be a man one must be macho and gung-ho, you are wrong. Both the attributes have nothing to do with being a man.

I can’t say much about bullying, as I didn’t experience such inconvenience during my formative years. Perhaps, I was not the skinny type who is constantly taunted and teased by his schoolmates. Size matters, and being a strapping six-footer, while in secondary school, I was left pretty much to myself. Nevertheless, bullying was not something common during my years in school. - Fathol Zaman Bukhari,Ipoh Echo.

Legasi Anwar dalam politik baru...

Pada 17 Jun 2017, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim mengumumkan beliau tidak menawarkan diri sebagai calon perdana menteri dalam PRU14. Ramai sedih mendengar pengumuman tersebut. Tetapi, mereka memahaminya. Pengumuman itu menunjukkan bahawa Anwar negarawan, bukannya sekadar ahli politik.  

Namun, Anwar tetap calon PM nombor satu PH. Mungkin bukan untuk kali ini. Tetapi, dalam politik, tidak ada yang mustahil.

Pengumuman tersebut tepat pada masanya. Ia memberi laluan untuk pimpinan PH memuktamadkan struktur organisasinya bagi tujuan pendaftarannya, dan dalam masa terdekat, iaitu seperti yang dicadangkan ramai, menamakan calon PM yang menunjukkan kita bergerak ke hadapan.

Di samping itu, saya tertarik dengan sepotong ayat dalam kenyataan Anwar itu – “mengusung idea politik baru”. Ini kerana saya menulis dua buah buku tentangnya: Politik Baru: Mematangkan Demokrasi Malaysia (2008) dan New Politics 2.0: Multiracial and Moderate Malaysian Democracy (2017).

Keputusan PRU10 (1999) menunjukkan ‘sesuatu yang baru’ berlaku dalam politik Malaysia. Sesetengah penganalisis mula menggunakan istilah ‘politik baru’. Dua buah buku ditulis tentangnya, iaitu Politik Baru dalam Pilihan Raya Umum oleh Mohd Yusof Kasim dan Azlan Ahmad (Ed.) (2002) dan New Politics in Malaysia oleh Fancis Loh Kok Wah dan Johan Saravanamuttu (Ed.) (2003).

Selanjutnya, Loh dan Saravanamuttu membahaskan pandangannya tentang Politik Baru dalam dua buah buku mereka. Pada 2009, Loh menulis Old vs New Politics in Malaysia: State and Society in Transition.

Beliau menyatakan bahawa politik lama adalah berdasarkan etnik dan dipengaruhi politik wang, manakala Politik Baru menuntut partisipasi demokratik, keadilan sosial, kebertanggungjawaban dan ketelusan, dan berorientasi multi-etnik.

Pada 2016, Saravanamuttu, dalam bukunya, Power Sharing in a Divided Nation: Mediated Communalism and New Politics in Six Decades of Malaysia’s Elections, menyatakan politik baru sinonim dengan Gerakan Reformasi, dan kini telah mendapat tempat yang penting dalam penulisan pengajian Malaysia.

Ia dikaitkan dengan gelombang pendemokrasian di Malaysia yang menyaksikan penglibatan kuat rakyat biasa dalam proses pilihan raya di sisi aktivisme politik yang tidak pernah berlaku sebelumnya.  

Menurut Saravanamuttu, pemecatan Anwar telah membuka pintu luas kepada participatory new politics yang dilambangi Gerakan Reformasi, yang mencetuskan penglibatan politik multi-etnik dan rentas-etnik yang tidak pernah berlaku sebelumnya dalam kalangan masyarakat sivil dan pembangkang.

Politik baru ialah politik partisipasi dalam ruang khalayak yang sedang berlaku yang bertujuan menegakkan nilai-nilai demokrasi dan hak asasi manusia yang mengatasi kepentingan etnik.

Perkembangannya melimpah ke proses pilihan raya, contohnya, keputusan Pakatan Rakyat yang memberangsangkan dalam PRU12 (2008) dan PRU13 (2013).

Hari ini, Politik Baru berlaku di banyak negara, termasuk negara Islam. Ted Piccone, dalam bukunya, Five Rising Democracies: and the fate of the international liberal order (2016) membicarakan lima demokrasi yang sedang meningkat: India, Brazil, Afrika Selatan, Turki dan Indonesia – Ibsati– negara-negara yang meninggalkan kolonialisme, aparteid dan diktator dan kini mengukuh dalam demokrasi berperlembagaan.

Manakala John L Esposito, Tamara Sonn dan John 0 Voll (Ed.) dalam bukunya, Islam and Democracy after the Arab Spring (2016) menyatakan “politik baru, iaitu gelombang keempat demokrasi menjadi kemungkinan global melalui perkembangan Arab Spring”.

Pada saya, bagi Anwar, politik baru bermula apabila beliau meninggalkan Abim untuk menyertai Umno untuk melakukan ‘reformasi dari dalam’. Selepas itu, beliau mempelopori Gerakan Reformasi dan memimpin pencapaiannya ‘yang tidak pernah berlaku sebelumnya’ itu. Hari ini, sebagai pengasas Forum Dunia Demokrat Muslim, beliau menjuarai idea ‘Demokrat Muslim’.- Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah,SH

Story kat sini...

Pasaitu DOJ tak hubungi peguam UMNO 

merangkap Peguam Negara..

The Sound of Silence

Lembu pun tau UMNO dengan PAS memang tengah 

"hot" bercinta.Hangpa nak tipu sapa la woi.

cheers.

Konspirasi mengharamkan DAP pada PRU14...

Anggota Parlimen Kluang mendakwa setiausaha akhbar perdana menteri secara tidak sengaja mengesahkan bahawa wujudnya rancangan untuk mengharamkan DAP pada pilihan raya umum (PRU) akan datang.

Liew Ching Tong mendakwa, ia ekoran kenyataan dibuat Datuk Seri Tengku Sariffuddin Tengku Ahmad mengenai kemungkinan sama ada DAP dibenarkan menggunakan logo roket pada PRU ke-14.

"Secara tidak sengaja, kenyataan Tengku Sariffuddin mengesahkan pemikiran orang di sekeliling (Datuk Seri) Najib (Razak) tentang rancangan perdana menteri untuk mengharamkan DAP sebelum PRU akan datang," katanya dalam kenyataan hari ini.

Status DAP berada dalam keadaan terawang-awang selepas timbul isu pemilihan parti pada 2012 yang dipertikaikan.

Ia menyebabkan DAP berdepan masalah tidak dapat menggunakan logonya pada PRU ke-13 tetapi Pendaftar Pertubuhan (ROS) tidak menyekat parti itu.

DAP kemudian mengadakan pemilihan semula pada 2013, tetapi pada 2014, ROS kemudian memberitahu bahawa pihak mereka masih belum mengetahui kesahihan jawatankuasa eksekutif pusat (CEC) DAP.

Sehubungan itu, Liew mendakwa tindakan ROS terhadap parti itu dianggap bertujuan untuk 'memusnahkan' DAP dengan cara yang paling kejam dan tidak demokratik.

Sebelum ini, Malaysiakini melaporkan, Tengku Sariffuddin meminta Liew memberi tumpuan kepada masalah serius dalam DAP berhubung penggunaan logo parti itu PRU akan datang.

Tengku Sariffuddin turut mendakwa DAP tidak demokratik apabila memanipulasi pemilihan parti dan 'Penang Official 1'- yang didakwa merujuk kepada Lim Guan Eng serta bapanya Lim Kit Siang - mengekalkan pemerintahan diktator selama setengah abad ke atas DAP.- mk

PM's aide confirms conspiracy 

to ban DAP from GE14...

Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's press secretary has inadvertently confirmed plans to have DAP banned prior to the next election, said one of the party's lawmakers.

Kluang MP Liew Chin Tong said Tengku Sariffuddin Tengku Ahmad (pix above) did this when he raised a poser about whether DAP can use its logo in the next general election.

"Inadvertently, Tengku Sariffuddin’s statement has also confirmed the thinking of Najib's inner circle that the embattled prime minister’s game plan is indeed to ban DAP just before the next general election," Liew said in a statement today.

DAP's status as a party is reportedly in limbo, after its 2012 party election was disputed due to irregularities.

Uncertainty over DAP's status caused the party to face a similar possibility of not being able to use its logo for GE13 but the Registrar of Societies (ROS) did not block them.

Liew said the ROS case against the party was "aimed at destroying DAP in the most vicious and undemocratic manner."

Liew and Tengku Sariffuddin exchanges were triggered by the DAP political education bureau chief's scathing analysis of Najib's position, claiming that he was in a weakened state despite initial proclamations that he was "unsinkable".

The prime minister's aide said Liew's analysis was "fake news" and urged him and his colleagues to focus on DAP's own internal matters, such as its party logo, asking "Penang Official 1" to resign, getting party supremo Lim Kit Siang to quit and installing DAP's maverick Kepong MP Tan Seng Giaw as the party's new leader.

The term "Penang Official 1" was coined by Tengku Sariffuddin in reference to Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng as a jab at critics of "Malaysian Official 1", which the US Department of Justice (DOJ) claimed was a beneficiary of allegedly stolen 1MDB funds and which the opposition has used as fodder.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Abdul Rahman Dahlan had confirmed that "Malaysian Official 1" was indeed Najib.

Najib denied any wrongdoing or using public funds for personal gain.

Meanwhile, Lim is facing two charges of graft which he claimed were politically motivated.- mk

Swiss Going For Jugular In 1MDB...

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) civil forfeiture suits have provided the most extensive documentation on the 1MDB scandal to date with damaging claims against the troubled Malaysian sovereign wealth fund and its key players.

While many BN leaders have chosen to remain silent, Umno, in particular, has been on a counter-offensive, accusing the US of foreign intervention or even trying to overthrow a Muslim government.

However, even before the DOJ filed its first civil forfeiture suit in July 2016, it was the Swiss authorities which had first gone public with its investigation into 1MDB.

Swiss AG announced Jan 29 2016 that US$4 b misappropriated from 1MDB.It had requested for mutual legal assistance from Malaysia and did so again on Oct 10 last year in relation to a further US$800 m linked to SRC Interntl.

Malaysian AG Apandi Ali snubbed both requests.

But despite being the first to go public on 1MDB, the Swiss authorities have released information sparingly to the public compared to the DOJ.

A contrast between the two is that the Swiss authorities are building a criminal case while the US one is a civil action, even though the DOJ has refused to say if criminal actions will follow.

Switzerland's OAG in an email reply to Malaysiakini said a criminal case is pending and that was why it had not released further information.

"Please take note that in Switzerland, pending criminal proceedings are, by law, confidential and we are generally bound by investigation secrecy...

The Swiss AG is going for the jugular. The Oomno doombnos will not understand what is jugular. 

If the Swiss commence criminal proceedings against the Malaysian crooks, it will be trial in absentia. 

Subpoenas will be issued - for the crooks to attend trial. Maybe Interpol Red Notices. Notices will be published in the newspapers. Malulah Doombno. 

If found guilty it will also be in absentia. Then Warrants of Arrest will be issued for those already found guilty. 

Imagine a Warrant of Arrest issued for MO1?

Wouldn't that be a dainty dish to be sat before the king.- ostb

1MDB: Switzerland siapkan kes jenayah

Story kat SINI dan SINI  

Story kat SINI dan SINI   

Sejarah tak pernah menipu...

Nasib kaulah macai...

cheers.

Tajaan haji 1MDB,mana laporan kewangan...

Setelah dedah maklumat tajaan haji, 1MDB digesa dedah laporan kewangan lengkap...

Sejak tahun 2011, seramai 5,711 jemaah telah ditaja menunaikan haji dengan perbelanjaan sebanyak RM56 juta melalui program khas Perdana Menteri -Yayasan 1MDB.

Menurut Pengerusi Jawatankuasa program berkenaan Datuk Jailani Ngah, pada tahun ini pula seramai 1,100 jemaah ditawarkan menyertai program tersebut.

Namun, di sebalik pengumuman itu, timbul pula persoalan lain melibatkan syarikat terpalit skandal pengubahan wang antarabangsa itu.

“Jumlah hutang 1MDB boleh berada sekitar RM50 hingga RM55 bilion – yang mana RM56 juta yang digunakan 1MDB untuk menaja Jemaah haji ke Mekah sejak enam tahun lalu sejak 2011 berada di sekitar 0.01 peratus daripada jumlah keseluruhan hutang 1MDB.

“Jika 1MDB boleh mendedahkan perbelanjaan RM56 juta sejak enam tahun lalu menaja 5,711 jemaah haji ke Mekah, mengapa 1MDB tidak boleh mendedahkan laporan kewangannya sejak tiga tahun lalu?” soal Ketua Parlimen DAP Lim Kit Siang dalam kenyataannya.

Ini kerana ujarnya, kali terakhir akaun 1MDB diaudit dan diterbitkan ialah pada bulan Mac 2014.

Sejak tarikh itu sehingga sekarang, penyata kewangan syarikat sarat hutang tersebut masih menjadi misteri termasuk kepada menteri-menteri kabinet.

“Saya menyeru, Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Razak supaya memikul tanggungjawab penuh sebagai individu, kerajaan dan perdana menteri terhadap skandal 1MDB dengan mendedahkan kepada orang awam perincian kewangan 1MDB hutang-hutang dan segala peruntukan yang dikeluarkan.

“Bukannya sekadar mendedahkan maklumat tertentu sahaja seperti penajaan menunaikan haji sebanyak RM56 juta sejak 2011,” katanya lagi. – Roketkini.com

Jamil Khir,kaji sumber 1MDB biaya haji

Mengapa 1MDB hanya dedah maklumat tajaan haji?

America is a Rorschach Test to most foreigners. What they view as America reveals more of themselves than of America; likewise, how they react to events in America.

One visitor to Washington, DC, would see only the homeless under the bridges, potholes on the streets, and “adult” stores at very corner; others, The Smithsonian, Georgetown University, and the National Institutes of Health. The contrasting observations reflect volumes on the observers.

Consider the Malaysian responses to the US Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuits relating to alleged illicit siphoning of funds from 1MDB. I am not referring to the kopi-o babbling in the echo chamber of UMNO-paid “cyber-troopers” that pollutes the social media. They are pet parrots; babbling whatever is coached to them. With a different master offering more leftovers they could be made to change their tune.

What interests me instead are the responses of ministers and commentators. Their utterances expose their appalling ignorance of the American justice system. They also reveal much of themselves, as per Rorschach’s insight.

One minister, eager to be seen as his master’s favorite lapdog, asserted that DOJ is being influenced by the Malaysian opposition. On cue, the other hounds and bitches piled on. A hitherto severe critic of the establishment pontificated that a former champion college debater together with Mahathir and Daim Zainuddin were involved.

Heady stuff for a young man! Though flattered, Syed Saddiq went ahead and filed a police report against that blogger! Mahathir described best those who believed such canards: “Bodoh luar biasa!” (Extraordinarily stupid!)

Those characters must also believe that the American judicial system is like Malaysia’s, where prosecutors could be influenced or paid off a la one Shafee Abdullah. Sarawak Report alleged that he was paid RM9.5 million from Najib’s slush fund before being appointed special prosecutor in Anwar Ibrahim’s case. Shafee has not denied that.

Another minister declared DOJ’s charges ‘mere’ allegations. Sorry, no marks for stating the obvious. A former journalist-turn-blogger echoed that, and proceeded, for emphasis, to reprint in bold the DOJ’s caution.

Of course DOJ’s accusations, like all court complaints, are “alleged” until adjudicated by the court. DOJ must have credible evidence to not waste taxpayers’ money on frivolous lawsuits. The jury would not buy it. DOJ does not allege any Joe on the street of corruption.

Those who believe otherwise must think that DOJ and American courts are like Malaysia’s where prosecutors could be bought to bring on cases with the flimsiest of evidences and still find judges to convict, as with Anwar’s case.

That is not a far stretch. A few years ago, a defense lawyer known for his amazing ‘skills’ in getting his clients acquitted was caught on videotape assuring his listener that he had the judge in his pocket. The lawyer’s utterance, “Correct! Correct! Correct!” would forever be embedded in the annals of shame in the Malaysian judiciary.

Then there was the character who insinuated that the ‘inactivity’ of DOJ since its first filing a year earlier reveals its sinister political motive. Had he followed the court’s calendar he would have noted the flurry of activities. Among them, the successful challenge by the new trustee of some of the seized properties to be represented.

This character went on to opine that since her initial filing in July 2016, US Attorney-General Loretta Lynch had been “fired,” implying that the lawsuit was without merit. Such willful ignorance reveals a deliberate attempt to mislead. Lynch was a political appointee, and with President Trump’s election all such appointees were replaced. Further, the second filing was by her successor.

Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid, a local PhD, implied that all the furor over 1MDB were fake news, the concoctions of hostile foreign media! It is instructive that this character did his dissertation on the local media. To him, the likes of The Wall Street Journal are like Utusan Melayu. His response reveals as much about him as the institution that awarded him his doctorate.

A junior minister accused the Americans of trying to topple Najib, in cahoots with the opposition. Not too long ago he and others were lapping at pictures of Najib golfing with President Obama. That minister however, did not see fit to lead a demonstration at the embassy in defense of Malaysia. Some jantan!

It is unfortunate that this non-too bright character’s remarks resonated with simple villagers.

A senior minister, a little brighter being that he was a London-trained lawyer, dismissed the whole DOJ affair. Malaysia had other far more important issues to attend to, he sniffed. If the staggering sums of the loot did not impress him, what about the charges of corruption levelled at the highest government official, cryptically referred to as “Malaysian Official 1.” That should be his and all Malaysians’ top priority.

Yet another minister advised everyone not to panic. The lady doth protest too much, methinks. Nobody was panicking except her crowd.

Attorney-General Apandi was miffed that DOJ did not consult him. DOJ’s lawsuits were prompted to protect American financial institutions from the corrupting influences of dirty foreign funds. It does not need Malaysia’s ‘help,’ more so considering that Apandi had declared no wrongdoing.

Apandi was also upset at the criminal insinuations against the prime minister. His comment unwittingly revealed what he thinks of his job, less as chief prosecutor, more as Najib’s private attorney. No wonder his “investigations” exonerated Najib! Apandi also unwittingly confirmed that MO1 is in fact Najib and that the activities he was alleged to have been engaged in were criminal in nature.

If the responses were revealing, the non-response or silence was even more so. The lawsuits allege that billions were illicitly siphoned from the company, and it is mentioned umpteen times in the complaints. Yet 1MDB did not seek to be represented as a party of interest. This reflects its management’s inability to separate the company’s interests from those of its officers’.

Najib is 1MDB’s chairman. The management confuses Najib with the company. Management is not looking after the company’s interest in not seeking representation, which was how the mess started in the first place.

Malaysian officials’ responses to DOJ’s lawsuits did not reflect well on them or Malaysia. I can hardly wait for their reactions or “spin” when this DOJ investigation goes on to its next inevitable phase, the filing of criminal charges and or when one of the defendants becomes a prosecution witness.

Meanwhile, fake news or not and collusion or not, MO1, his spouse, or stepson will not be stepping foot in America any time soon, if ever. That is revealing. – June 27, 2017 – LKSBlog

1MDB: Dissecting One Of 

The World's Biggest Financial Scandals

Rupa2nya Cina gemuk ni lebih cerdik drp Najib!

cheers.

Kalau PAS mahu jadi khadam UMNO, so what...

Alasan PAS menolak pelawaan Pakatan Harapan untuk bekerjasama dalam menangani skandal mega 1MDB menjadi isyarat bahawa PAS sudah tenggelam dalam skrip UMNO.

Ahli Parlimen Kuala Nerus, Khairuddin Aman Razali dilaporkan berkata PAS tidak sama sekali akan “terikut-ikut” dan “terpengaruh” dengan pihak luar, merujuk Jabatan Kehakiman Amerika Syarikat (DOJ).

“Pakatan Harapan hari ini musuh kepada PAS dan mereka juga menuduh PAS kononnya mendapat duit daripada Umno dan sebagainya,” ujarnya dilaporkan media.

Sebagai reaksi kepada kenyataan terbabit, Setiausaha Eksekutif Sosialis Muda DAP (DAPSY) Muhammad Shakir Ameer mempersoalkan sama ada PAS tidak langsung peduli tentang penyelewengan yang berlaku.

“Sebagai seorang Ahli Parlimen, Khairuddin harus sedar betapa serius isu ini atau saja buat tidak tahu?

“Saya pelik dan geli dengan gelagat PAS baru baru ini. Dan tertanya-tanya saya adakah PAS ingin kembali dengan Barisan Nasional seperti dibawah Ust Asri Muda sesuatu masa dahulu,” ujarnya dalam satu kenyataan.

Menurut Shakir lagi, sikap PAS yang seolah-olah dilihat sebagai kuda tunggangan UMNO menimbulkan tanda tanya bahawa adakah parti tersebut lebih rela menjadi ‘macai’ kepada ‘Malaysian Official 1’ daripada melawan salah guna dana awam.

DOJ baru-baru ini mendedahkan butiran lanjut mengenai skandal pengubahan wang haram melibatkan dana terkait 1MDB yang digunakan untuk membeli hak cipta filem, serta barang kemas untuk seorang model, dan juga isteri kepada karakter ‘Malaysian Official 1’ yang disahkan oleh Pengarah Komunikasi Strategik Barisan Nasional, Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan sebagai Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

PAS mengambil pendirian aneh dengan menyifatkan tindakan undang-undang DOJ terbabit sebagai campur tangan asing, meski kesalahan melibatkan dana 1MDB itu dilakukan di luar negara.

“Sebagai parti politik yang sudah lama dalam kancah politik, PAS hendaklah membuat keputusan untuk bersama mereka yang korup atau mereka yang melawan korupsi,” tegas Shakir. – Roketkini.com

Nasrudin Hasan Tantawi otak udang...

Proton vs 1MDB...

Idea Siapa untuk Menghasilkan kereta Nasional buatan anak Bangsa Melayu Islam?

Idea siapa berniaga dengan berhutang dan akhirnya menjual negara ?

PROTON

1.Ogos 1983 mula pembinaan kilang kereta Proton di Shah Alam pinjam wang Kerajaan sebanyak Rm 480 juta.

2.Julai 1985 kereta pertama Proton Saga keluar dari kilang.

3. Disember 1996 Proton berjaya mengeluarkan sejumlah 1 juta kereta.

4.Perolehan/Turnover
   1993  : Rm 2,286,500,000
   1994  : Rm 3,087,000,000
   1995  : Rm 3,708,400,000
   1996. : Rm 5,166,700,000

5.Untung sebelum cukai
   1993  : Rm 311,200,000
   1994  : Rm 282,000,000
   1995  : Rm 307,900,000
   1996  : Rm 454,600,000
   1997  : Proton umum untung sebelum cukai telah melepasi RM 1 Bilion pada tahun kewangan berakhir 31.3.1997.

6. Cukai yang telah dikutip oleh Kerajaan dari Proton dalam tempoh 10 tahun ialah sebanyak Rm 18 Bilion.

7. Model kereta Proton yang telah dipasarkan ialah Proton Saga, Waja, Iswara, Satria, Gen 2, Arena, Juara, Perdana, Exora, Inspira, Preve, Suprima dan Iriz.

8. Memberi perkerjaan kepada 30 ribu orang dan majoritinya ialah anak Melayu Islam.

1MDB 

1. 2009 bermula dengan nama Trengganu Investment Authority@TIA dan seterusnya ditukar nama ke 1Malaysian Development Berhad @1MDB

2. Modal Rm 1 juta

3. Pinjam melalui terbitan bon sebanyak Rm 42 Bilion

4. Beli asset stesen janakuasa letrik@IPP dari Syarikat Genting dan Tanjong berjumlah Rm 18 Bilion

5. Beli tanah TRX,Kem Tudm Sg Besi dan Air Hitam, Penang Rm 1.7 Bilion.

6. Pelaburan diluar negara, UAE, ARAB SAUDI, CAYMAN ISLAND DAN BRITISH VIRGIN Rm 15.4 Bilion

7. Perbelanjaan Kewangan @Finance Charges Rm 5.5 Bilion

8. Kerugian pertukaran mata wang asing ( forex losses ) Rm 1 Bilion.

9. Jumlah rugi besar yang dilapor pada tahun  kewangan berakhir 2013/2014 ialah Rm 665 juta.

10. Laporan kewangan tahun 2015 dan 2016 belum boleh dikeluarkan lagi.

11.Terkini hutang telah meningkat ke Rm 50 bilion.

12. Janakuasa Letrik @IPP telah dijual kepada syarikat negara Cina dengan harga Rm 9.5 Bilion.

13. Tanah Kem TUDM Sg Besi pun telah dijual kepada syarikat negara Cina Laknatullah.

Siapa sebenarnya penipu, penyangak dan penyamun ? - Anonymous

Miranda Kerr's earnings repossessed. 

Malulah Malaysia...

Someone sent this...

The leading story in the Times Newspaper today has offered the Malaysian Prime Minister, 1MDB and their admittedly limited group of enthusiastic supporters the perfect opportunity to prove their various denials by putting them to the test in court.

The paper leads with the headline “Supermodel surrenders £6million jewels’ and then introduces the UK public across a full page story to the essentials of the 1MDB theft.

“Gifts are suspected to have been bought with stolen Malaysian funds”, the paper begins detailing the gifts also to Leo DiCaprio, the Picassos and Jho Low’s super yacht.  This is all, of course, old news to Malaysian readers of online news, however Malaysians are also aware that the Prime Minister, the fund and his government are all denying any of this is true.

They have accused the United States Department of Justice of being in a ‘political conspiracy’ against Najib and have accused journalists like Sarawak Report of being agitators, spies, collaborators and all the rest.

They even dismiss the detailed 251 page court document showing the exact money trails by which the 1MDB money was stolen by Jho Low, then went into gifts and bank accounts belonging to Najib, his wife and their celebrity contacts, as ‘showing no proof’.

So far it has been Najib and his supporters who have been remarkably unable to produce any evidence to back their far-fetched excuses, compared to the overwhelming and devastating documentation by US and other foreign investigators.

In fact, the replacement AG’s refusal to cooperate, his refusal to investigate and now his pretense that no one has asked him to do either has been a stunning tacit admission of guilt on the part of his de facto boss, Najib.

Today the PM propaganda unit Jasa even blathered that Miranda Kerr should have handed the jewels back to Jho Low on the basis they had not been bought with stolen money…. without providing a shred of evidence, once more, for such a wild claim.

At the end of next month Najib has to find over $600 million to pay IPIC as a first installment of what Malaysia has been forced by court action to admit 1MDB owes.  

Laughably he pretends he is going to get this from money he pretends still exists in 1MDB’s own bank accounts, even though the combined investigations and court actions of the US and Singapore have demonstrated there isn’t a penny there.

Bankers are serving jail sentences in Singapore having admitted that fact and their own complicity in the thefts.

Malaysians will be treated to a ridiculous farce as Najib will have to raise the money from the Treasury, or taxes or borrowing (or stealing behind the scenes from other public companies and sell offs) and then lie that it is coming from 1MDB.

Unless, of course, he bites the bullet and takes The Times to court for joining the conspiracy of lies.  In fact, there are numerous papers he could sue, since they have all covered the case – he can take his pick.

He didn’t do very well in the arbitration process, however, which he plainly lost completely.  He would lose in the London Court as well, given he plainly has no evidence to back up nonsense.

So Najib will keep his head down and hope Malaysians will continue to put up with their Thieving Clown Prime Minister. -anonymous,ostb

Few Malays visit non-Malay open houses 
for non-Muslim festivals?...

To this day, I still continue what I did as a child, which is to visit friends’ open houses for non-Muslim festivals. Christmas lunches. New Year parties. Deepavali. Reunion dinners on Chinese New Year’s eve and tossing the yee sang two weeks later.

Some time ago, close Chinese friends quietly expressed sadness, that very few Malays, if any, were willing to share the CNY celebrations, and my Indian friends, their Deepavali open houses.

Despite their claims that they would ensure the food was halal, and provide new paper plates and plastic cups, Malays stayed away.

Why?

Why are fewer Malays visiting non-Malay open houses for the various festivals?

It appears that the issue is not just with food. Some object to visiting places where there is a shrine. A few refuse to eat off crockery and cutlery that has ‘touched’ pork. Others worry about the content of the soap with which to wash their hands.

Many Malays are oblivious to how their non-Malay colleagues go out of their way to accommodate Malay sensitivities. Sometimes, even the best efforts are in vain.

One friend said, “What is the point of ordering food from a Malay restaurant, and serve it for CNY? The idea is to partake in our celebratory dishes and cakes. We would have ensured that the ingredients were halal. Apparently, that is not good enough.”

When it comes to pot-luck or giving food as presents, non-Malays express frustration that their contributions are refused, even if the non-Malay took great pains to ensure the use of halal ingredients. Rejection of their unappreciated and wasted efforts, is hard to accept.

Malay Intolerance

Official functions are also dominated by Malay intolerance. A friend said that the Malay organisers of a parent-teacher association dinner at a school in Malacca arranged for a restaurant which had the ‘Halal’ accreditation, to cater the function. It would have been a halal Chinese dinner. Unfortunately, the arrangement was cancelled as a few of the Malay parents and teachers objected, because the restaurant owner and his staff were Chinese.

Would these parents kick up a fuss if they were overseas? Are they as demanding when they go on holiday in overseas locations?

Malay intolerance is disrupting national harmony.  Malaysia was once a place which practised a moderate, inclusive brand of Islam, but the radicals and hardliners have corrupted the minds of many Malays.

So, what happened to the tolerance of the Malays, and how did they forget they are living in multi-cultural Malaysia?

The Perak mufti, Harussani Zakaria, once forbade Malays from visiting their friends’ homes, during the festivals.

One hopes that the intolerant Malays can regain their ability to rationalise and recover their Malaysian multicultural identity. - Mariam Mokhtar

How Najib’s strategic planning has backfired...

cheers.