1. Siapa pembunuh sebenar Altantuya..?
2. Siapa dalang pembunuhan Altantuya..?
3. Apa motif sebenar pembunuhan Altantuya..?
4. Kenapa lemah pembuktian pasukan Pendakwaan dalam kes Altantuya..?
5. Berapa banyak wang rakyat, masa dan tenaga staff PDRM dan Mahkamah dibazirkan utk kes Altantuya..?
6. Kenapa integeriti badan kehakiman makin tercalar? (keputusan awal Mahkamah Tinggi bercanggah dgn keputusan akhir Mahkamah Rayuan..?).
7. Apa hubung kait kematian PI Bala dengan kematian Altantuya..?
8. Kenapa persepsi rakyat kaitkan Rosmah dan Najib dengan kematian Altantuya..?
9. Kenapa Peguam Negara tak buat rayuan bila Razak Baginda dibebaskan?
10) Apakah pembebasan Razak Baginda,Azilah Hadri dan Sirul Azhar Umar merupakan satu konspirasi yang terancang bagi menjaminkan agar tak membabitan Najib Tun Razak?-f/bk
Sementara itu peguam kanan Karpal Singh akan memohon untuk memanggil Datuk Seri
Najib Razak dan bekas pembantunya DSP Musa Safri dalam saman RM100 juta
berkaitan pembunuhan warganegara Monglia Altantuya Shaariibuu.Karpal yang mewakili keluarga Altantuya berkata, mereka akan mengaktifkan semula saman itu, yang tertangguh sehinggalah keputusan dibuat oleh mahkamah jenayah.
Katanya, walaupun pembebasan dua anggota polis oleh Mahkamah Rayuan pagi ini memberi kesan terhadap saman sivil, kes itu akan diputuskan mengikut imbangan kebarangkalian.
"Seperti (bekas pemain ragbi Amerika Syarikat) OJ Simpson, walaupun dia dibebaskan, saman sivil mendapati beliau bertanggungjawab (atas kematian isterinya).
"Kami akan panggil Najib dan Musa untuk menghubungkan keadaan yang membawa kepada kematian Altantuya. Musa mungkin tidak bertindak sendiri atas perkara itu.
"Terdapat peluang mewujudkan kesalahan atas pihak lain," kata Karpal kepada pemberita di Shah Alam hari ini.
Kalau kita membunuh,tapi tiada niat,kita boleh bebas dari pertuduhan...
Sekarang kalau kita membunuh orang, tapi pendakwa raya tidak dapat membuktikan ada niat, kita boleh lepas dari pertuduhan membunuh.
Walaupun setelah kita tembak seseorang, kemudian menaruh bahan letupan dalam rongga dan tempat mana ada lubang dibadan dan letupkan- sehingga tulang belulang berkecai dan berterbangan- itu semua bukan pembayang ada niat membunuh.
Kita ada perbuatan membunuh, tapi tidak ada niat itu tidak mengapa? System pengadilan apa yang kerajaan pimpinan UMNO bangsa Melayu kita ini amalkan?
Sungguh benar apa yang nyatakan oleh
pendita Zaaba. Kezaliman keatas bangsa Melayu dilakukan oleh pemerintah
dari bangsa Melayu itu sendiri.
Tugas pertama kerajaan baru yang akan ganti BN yang korap ini ialah mengadakan retrial dan panggil semua orang yang tidak dipanggil untuk memberi keterangan. Hari ini hari malang untuk keluhuran undang2 di Malaysia. Kita tidak akan tahu siapa yang memerintah supaya Altantuya dibunuh.
Lagi pun mengikut lojik soldadu UMNO- tidak mengapa Altantuya dibunuh kerana dia pelacur anatrabangsa yang telah memberi perkhidmatan istimewa kepada Razak Baginda dan mugkin juga pemimpin tertingi negara.
Hal pantat memantat, pemimpin tertingi negara tidak kurang hebat nya.- Mohd.Ariff Sabri bin Hj. Abdul Aziz@sakmongkol ak47
Surat Terakhir Altantuya
In court of public opinion, AG has failed Altantuya too...
They pointed out that besides the taxpayers’ money used on this high-profile case, and the failure to secure convictions, this case also put the administration of justice in a negative light especially because it involved the murder of a foreigner.
"The perception among the public was that the trial was a sham," said lawyer Fahri Azzat.
"The public knew the two policemen would be acquitted on appeal and they were proved correct today. Even at the High Court stage the public was cynical about the way the prosecution conducted the case," Fahri said.
He questioned why material witnesses were not called to testify and documentary evidence not tendered in court.
Fahri said the public's suspicions were reinforced when political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda, charged with abetting the cops, was acquitted without his defence being called.
He said that when the AG did not appeal that decision, it raised eyebrows.
"Public funds were spent over the high-profile case and the public was left wondering over the way the prosecution conducted the case," he said.
Lawyer Amer Hamzah Arshad said the defence took advantage of the defects in the prosecution’s case and the trial judge’s ruling to secure the acquittal of the two policemen, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azhar Umar.
Amer said the defence raised valid and relevant issues which any defence counsel familiar with criminal procedure and law of evidence would have done.
"There was a material gap in the prosecution's case and they took advantage of that before the Court of Appeal," he said.
Amer said it is elementary for the prosecution to present material evidence to prove its case but this was not done.
Senior criminal lawyer Gurbachan Singh said today's judgment was valid.
"There was no judicial appreciation by the trial judge. He should have considered these issues and decided upon it," he said, adding that the appellate court was right in rendering the conviction unsafe due to the trial judge’s misdirection.
However, Gurbachan said the Court of Appeal was not saying that the two former policemen were innocent, but that the prosecution had not done enough to prove its case.
"Ultimately, the benefit of the doubt must be given to the accused.
"To be fair to the prosecution, the material gaps were the misdirection by the judge.
"Perhaps, the only mistake the prosecution committed was their failure to call DSP Musa Safri to the stand," added Gurbachan.
Former chief inspector Azilah managed to create doubt that he was not at the crime scene. He had also given the prosecution a notice of alibi, a requirement under the law.
In the case of former corporal Sirul, counsel Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin said the failure of the prosecution to call Musa, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's former aide-de-camp, left a "material gap" in the prosecution's case. – Malaysian Insider
cheers.
No comments:
Post a Comment