Mahkamah Tinggi Pulau Pinang hari ini diberitahu mengenai "kebaikan"
pejuang kemerdekaan Mat Indera semasa serangan ke atas balai polis Bukit
Kepong pada 1950-an.Peguam Hanipa Maidin yang mewakili timbalan presiden PAS Mohamad Sabu dalam perbicaraan saman sivil ke atas Utusan Malaysia berkata, akhbar itu juga mengemukakan satu kenyataan daripada Mat Indera semasa dipenjarakan.
Hanipa berkata, kenyataan itu menunjukkan Mat Indera tidak terlibat dalam serangan ke atas pasukan polis.
"Semasa insiden tersebut, Mat Indera membantu seorang isteri anggota polis dan seorang kanak-kanak dan turut menyelamatkan seorang anggota polis," kata Hanipa ketika ditemui Malaysiakini di luar mahkamah.
"Ini menunjukkan beliau tidak terlibat dalam tembak-menembak (yang mengorbankan kira-kira 26 orang) atau pembakaran balai pois. Ini menunjukkan tindakan itu dilakukan oleh individu," katanya.
“Tidak benar jika dikatakan Mat Indera adalah seorang komunis. Ke mana saja dia pergi dia bercakap mengenai Islam dan membaca al-Quran kepada orang ramai. Jika dia seorang komunis, kenapa dia bertindak begitu," katanya.- malaysiakini
Court revelation 'proves' Mat Indera not a Communist...
The Penang High Court, which sits today for the civil suit of PAS leader Mohamad Sabu against Utusan Malaysia, heard a “good revelation” on Independence fighter Mat Indera during the 1950s Bukit Kepong attack.
Lawyer Hanipa Maidin (left), who acts for Mohamad, better known as Mat Sabu, said Utusan produced
a statement taken from Mat Indera while he was in jail, which indicated
that he was not involved in the attack against the police.
“During the incident, Mat Indera assisted the wife of a policeman and a child, he even saved a member of the police,” said Hanipa when met by Malaysiakini outside the court.
“This showed he was not involved in the open fire (which killed about 26 people) or the burning of the police station. It showed that the act was done by individuals,” he added.
“It is not right to say Mat Indera was a communist. Wherever he went, he spoke about Islam and cited the al-Quran to the people. If he was a communist, why would he do that?” questioned Hanipa.
Hanipa also said that Mat Indera was a kind man, as during the Bukit Kepong incident he had prevented a soldier from shooting a woman and during a flood situation, he had helped those who were affected.
Hanipa reiterated that Mat Indera was not a communist but fought against the British colonials and colonialism as the country was fighting towards independence at that time in history.
“Utusan never highlighted the fact that in the book ‘Pengukir Nama Johor’,
Menteri Besar Abdul Ghani Othman, in his foreword, had explicitly and
categorically said that people must respect Independence fighters,
including Mat Indera,” Hanipa pointed out.
Mat Sabu, the PAS deputy chief, is suing the Umno-owned Malay daily for publishing several reports that he had praised the communists who attacked the Bukit Kepong police station.
When met outside the court, Mat Sabu told Malaysiakini that until today, he strongly maintains that Mat Indera is not a communist and was a “very religious man”.
“He was a martyr, he saved senior citizens, a woman and children during the incident, and he practised his religion devoutly,” he added.
Judge Zakaria Sam presided over the case, with counsel for Utusan being Fairus Hussein and Hafarizam Harun.
Other than Hanipa, Mat Sabu was also represented by lawyers Amiruddin Zulkipli and Azhana Mohd Khairuddin.- malaysiakini
Mat Sabu denies supporting communist ideology
Lawyer Hanipa Maidin (left), who acts for Mohamad, better known as Mat Sabu, said Utusan produced
a statement taken from Mat Indera while he was in jail, which indicated
that he was not involved in the attack against the police.“During the incident, Mat Indera assisted the wife of a policeman and a child, he even saved a member of the police,” said Hanipa when met by Malaysiakini outside the court.
“This showed he was not involved in the open fire (which killed about 26 people) or the burning of the police station. It showed that the act was done by individuals,” he added.
“It is not right to say Mat Indera was a communist. Wherever he went, he spoke about Islam and cited the al-Quran to the people. If he was a communist, why would he do that?” questioned Hanipa.
Hanipa also said that Mat Indera was a kind man, as during the Bukit Kepong incident he had prevented a soldier from shooting a woman and during a flood situation, he had helped those who were affected.
Hanipa reiterated that Mat Indera was not a communist but fought against the British colonials and colonialism as the country was fighting towards independence at that time in history.
“Utusan never highlighted the fact that in the book ‘Pengukir Nama Johor’,
Menteri Besar Abdul Ghani Othman, in his foreword, had explicitly and
categorically said that people must respect Independence fighters,
including Mat Indera,” Hanipa pointed out.
‘Mat Indera very religious’
Mat Sabu, the PAS deputy chief, is suing the Umno-owned Malay daily for publishing several reports that he had praised the communists who attacked the Bukit Kepong police station.
When met outside the court, Mat Sabu told Malaysiakini that until today, he strongly maintains that Mat Indera is not a communist and was a “very religious man”.
“He was a martyr, he saved senior citizens, a woman and children during the incident, and he practised his religion devoutly,” he added.
Judge Zakaria Sam presided over the case, with counsel for Utusan being Fairus Hussein and Hafarizam Harun.
Other than Hanipa, Mat Sabu was also represented by lawyers Amiruddin Zulkipli and Azhana Mohd Khairuddin.- malaysiakini
Mat Sabu denies supporting communist ideology
cheers.
No comments:
Post a Comment