Kenyataan terbaru yang dibuat oleh Peguam Sivarasa Rasiah bahawa beliau akan mendedahkan nama-nama individu yang mendalangi tindakan Rahimi Osman menarik-balik dua akuan bersumpah yang mengaitkan Perdana Menteri Najib Razak dan isterinya Rosmah Mansor. Pendedahan itu akan dibuat dalam masa terdekat. Malah dia juga percaya ada individu yang mendalangi tindakan Rahimi meminda semula dua akuan bersumpah itu.Sivarasa menambah motif utama bukan tertumpu kepada kenyataan bersumpah tetapi usaha menjatuhkan Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim dan peguam. Kami tidak terkejut dengan kenyataan terbaru Sivarasa ini sebenarnya. Menerusi risikan krew kami yang amat kenal rapat dengan si Rahimi hatta ayahnya sendiri mendapati ternyata pendedahan Sivarasa itu mungkin ada kebenarannya. Tambahan pula kami mendapat maklumat bahawa Rahimi baru sahaja mendaftar sebagai ahli parti UMNO beberapa bulan yang lalu. Maknanya kemungkinan besar ada orang yang rapat dengannya dalam UMNO yang mencadangkan "plan terbaru" ini.
Soalnya, siapakah orang yang rapat dengannya dalam UMNO?. Apakah bekas Ketua Angkatan Muda Keadilan (AMK) si Ezam Md Noor?. Jika dilihat kepada perjalanan cerita Rahimi, mungkin juga Ezam yang membawa beliau sertai UMNO. Tambahan pula Rahimi yang membawa Saiful Bukhari berjumpa Ezam untuk mengadu bahawa Saiful diliwat oleh Anwar pada tahun 2008 dulu. Maknanya Ezam kemungkinan besar "mastermind" untuk merangka segala tindakan terbaru Rahimi ini. Ezam dilantik sebagai Senator oleh Najib pun untuk tujuan ini sebenarnya. Selagi Anwar masih ada di depan mata, maka selagi itu Najib tidak boleh "lena tidur" dan "bagai cacing kepanasan".
source:pahang daily online
Berikut adalah beberapa komen pengunjung Malaysiakini tentang penarikan balik akuan sumpah Rahimi Osman......
P Dev Anand Pillai: Do you think this Rahimi chap will be bothered about lawsuits? By now, the people behind him would have contacted their panel of Umno lawyers who will be ready to take on the matter and ensure that it will be heard before a friendly and favourable judge who would only rule in their favour. We have so many judges to pick and choose from so what is there to worry about? The only way this country is going to save its institutions is to ensure that the current regime is shown the door in the next by by-election in Kelantan and at the much awaited general elections.
Abil: How come they are taking this Rahimi fellow seriously, when PI P Balasubramaniam was not taken seriously? We need to investigate both this fellows statutory declarations. We want the truth. Did the MACC go to UK for Bala's interview? What happened to that episode?
Kunta Kinte: Rahimi might have thought that BN will be there forever, running the government. What would he do if Pakatan Rakyat wins the next general election? Who will protect him from justice. With or without Anwar Ibrahim, Pakatan will win and Rahimi better have a plan B. Could his plan B be, to twist around and says that the original SD was good? Anything is possible with this thick face human being. He didn't graduate so he can't think, can he?
Cala: If there is a 'rule by law', an accused will be charged because they is evidence against him. But such was not the case for 'Sodomy I' wherein Anwar Ibrahim was charged. So where was the evidence? Remember the 6'0'x 6'0' mattress which was brought in and out of the courtroom? When Anwar's lawyer asked the chemist to hand over the 'evidence' for an independent laboratory test, guess what? The chemist had the audacity to say that all evidences had been thrown away as he thought the court would not need it. In another words, he appeared to have said: 'Trust me, take my words for it'. Would you now want to believe there is evidence in Sodomy II? Or any case that is related to political persecution?
cheers.
No comments:
Post a Comment