Who is Yang Arif Ramly Ali,that granted the stay of execution.........

The Appeal Court Judge,Ramly Ali who granted a stay of execution on the High Court decision which recognised Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin as the rightful Perak menteri besar, was a former Chief Registrar who was appointed as Appeal Court judge on 15 April 2009.

He was one of the candidate recommended by V.K.Lingam in his controversial Lingam Tape scandal that showed lawyer V.K.Lingam who was in a monologue over his mobile phone and it was unclear who he was talking to.

The telephone conversation focussed on the following reasons:

a. Ahmad Fairuz was referred to as “Datuk” and there was talk of getting a “Tan Sri”-ship for him the same year. Ahmad Fairuz was awarded the Panglima Setia Mahkota (P.S.M) by the Yang di Pertuan Agong during the King’s birthday in June 2002, making him a Tan Sri.

b. There was reference of making “Datuk Heliliah, Datuk Ramli and Datuk Maroop” as judges — on 8th February 2002, Datuk Heliliah Mohd Yusuf, former Solicitor-General, Datuk Ramly Ali, a former Chief Registrar and Datuk Ahmad Maarop, a former Commissioner of Law Revision, received their letters of appointment as High Court judges from the Yang di Pertuan Agong. Their appointments were from Feb. 1, 2002.

c. There was reference that “in three months time” Ahmad Fairuz would be made President of Court of Appeal and “six months time” he was going to be Chief Justice - Ahmad Fairuz was sworn in as President, Court of Appeal on Dec. 1, 2002 and appointed Chief Justice of Malaysia on March 17, 2003.

Shouldnt an Appeal Court sits with a minimum of 3 judges? I am no loyarburuk, but thats what my father use to tell before, unless they changed the rules of the game.......

Shouldnt those names mentioned by the lawyer in the Lingam tape scandal be investigated first?

correct....correct....correct....

Read here and here.

Btw. the dissolution of DUN Perak is up to Tuanku Sultan. Since the legitimate MB Nizar receive the 'stay order' he cannot perform his duty of seeking the Sultan to dissolve the State Assembly.

While Zambry, the high court rules that he is not the rightful MB. He is now the caretaker MB and its against the law to claim himself as MB, thus the Sultan cannot accept and act according to what this illegal MB wants.

Since both MB cannot represent the State Government, it is rightfully up to the Sultan's decision whether to call for a dissolution or not.

cheers.