Depa tolak ‘hudud’ bukan kafir, murtad, munafik dan sesat...

Mana-mana pihak yang tidak bersetuju dan menolak Rang Undang-undang (RUU) Mahkamah Syariah (Bidang Kuasa Jenayah) (Pindaan) 2016 tidak boleh dituduh sebagai kafir, murtad, munafik dan sesat.

Ketua Biro Pemantapan dan Pemahaman Agama Angkatan Muda Keadilan (AMK), Wan Ji Wan Hussin menjelaskan, Presiden PAS, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang tidak membentangkan hukum syariah sebaliknya hanya memohon keizinan untuk meminda salah satu akta dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

“Walaupun ada tanggapan mengatakan bahawa pindaan tersebut membolehkan pelaksanaan enakmen hudud Kelantan, ia tetap tidak boleh dituduh kafir, murtad, sesat dan munafik.

“Hal ini kerana enakmen itu sendiri dipenuhi dengan pandangan ulama-ulama PAS, bukan sepenuhnya syariah,” katanya dalam satu kenyataan di Facebooknya hari ini.

Menurutnya, sifat syariah tidak boleh diubah dan dipinda kerana ia hak mutlak Allah, namun enakmen hudud Kelantan itu adalah pindaan dari 1993 kepada 2015.

“Pindaan berlaku pada enakmen kerana ulama-ulama PAS sendiri sedar ia bukan syariah tetapi pandangan-pandangan mereka. Jika mereka anggap enakmen itu adalah syariah, sudah pasti mereka tidak akan pinda,” kata beliau lagi.

Jelasnya, jika ada pihak menganggap mereka yang menolak enakmen itu sebagai seorang yang murtad, sudah pasti ulama-ulama PAS yang meminda RUU itu lebih murtad.

Khamis lalu, RUU yang dibawakan Hadi itu diusulkan supaya dipercepatkan oleh Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said sebelum disokong Timbalan Menteri Kerja Raya, Datuk Rosnah Abdul Rashid Shirlin.

Tindakan itu menyebabkan pemimpin parti komponen bukan Islam dalam BN mengugut akan meletak jawatan dalam Kabinet jika usul itu diluluskan Dewan Rakyat pada Oktober nanti.

Antara pemimpin yang membantah adalah Presiden MIC, Datuk Seri Dr S Subramaniam; Presiden MCA, Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai; Timbalan Presiden MCA, Datuk Seri Wee Ka Siong dan Presiden GERAKAN, Datuk Seri Mah Siew Keong.- fmt

The ‘invisible’ Kuala Kangsar widow...

Can one be invisible and yet win an election? Will the people vote for someone they have never seen and do not know if he or she can walk, talk or perform the duties once elected? WIll the voters vote on sentimentality alone, because the one they formerly elected died in a helicopter crash and this new candidate is his mourning wife, who insists on running for election but insists that she has to mourn? Will a Malay majority constituency vote in a widow who will be mourning at home but have been instructed to campaign online?

Looks like Umno (and Barisan Nasional presumably) think so, for they will nominate Datin Mastura Mohd Yazid, the 55-year-old wife of Datuk Wan Mohammad Khair-il Anuar Wan Ahmad, who was killed in the helicopter crash with five others during the recent Sarawak state election for the Kuala Kangsar by-election come June 5. 

Mastura, a lawyer by training, seems to be in a spot, despite apologising profusely for not being able to campaign openly, for she has to ‘perform her religious duties’. 

Umno either has a problem finding any other candidate, or thinks that MP-ship is a family affair. Or Umno thinks that a sad, mourning widow, who is strictly performing her iddah, will touch the hearts of the Malay majority voters. 

Maybe they want to make her look more ‘religious’ than PAS  candidate Perak PAS women’s wing chief Dr Najihatussalehah Ahmad. 

BN here is taking a big chance by ignoring the non-Malay voters, for it has yet to be seen how they will vote in an invisible candidate on the guarantee of Umno leaders. Either all the reasons above, or Umno has decided to give the seat to PAS on a golden platter, in the name of their newfound friendship. 

Umno ulama Fathul Bari’s insistence that Mastura be left to her mourning had Datuk Puad Zarkashi retorting that one can even win from the jail like Hindraf leader and that Mastira can do her campaigning online. Puad also said that Mastura need not be present at the nomination in person. 

This also has many questioning whether Mastura is the only candidate Umno has and what about all this iddah insistence when she is aiming to represent a state constituency in the state assembly. 

Although Muslim women are asked to practice iddah upon the death of the husband for 40 days traditionally, due to changes in circumstance where women are also breadwinners and main carers for their children and cannot afford to stay at home dressed in white with limited flowers, as requested by Umno ulama Fathul Bari. 

The modern Muslim woman practises iddah by minimising socialising where necessary and going out, but if she has to, for example go to work and interact with male colleagues and perform her daily chores because she has to or she will lose her job, she can do so and religion would not chastise her for that. There is nothing in Islam that says a widow has to be locked up in her house wearing white clothes.

In traditional times, the 40 day mourning period was given for the widow to mourn and regain her composure as a widow in mourning is thought to be weak psychologically and mentally to face society. Also, at that time, community will do everything else for the widow while she stays at home completely. That community is no more.

Thus, nowadays, more progressive ulama have agreed that women can go out to work, for which company will allow women to take 40 days’ leave to mourn their husband? Furthermore, Malay women have come far in their gender roles and do more than the men, while keeping in line with their role as Muslim women. And even if Mastura has the right to mourn for 40 days, she could still come out and meet people, for not doing so would not be fair for those whom she is asking to vote her in. For being a people’s representative is a big responsibility in Islam, and voting in the right person is a big duty. 

All that said, one however thinks that Umno leaders will try their best to keep Mastura at home and win the by-election based on sentimentality alone, using Mastura’s name.- Zakiah Koya,theheatmalaysia.

Pemilihan Datin Mastura sebagai calon BN dalam PRK Kuala Kangsar bakal membuka jalan untuk lain-lain isteri wakil rakyat UMNO bertanding jika suami mereka alami nasib sama seperti Allahyarham suami Datin Mastura. Bagaimana pula keadaannya jika ia berlaku kepada MP PEKAN? Adakah isterinya akan dipilih sebagai calon mewakili BN?- f/bk

Balu dalam edah dipilih calon PRK Kuala Kangsar...

Ridhuan Tee Abdullah istiharkan KELUAR dari UMNO...opsss MCA kerana tak bersetuju dgn pendirian parti itu terhadap RUU Persendirian yang dibawa oleh Hadi Awang...Ridhuan adalah ahli seumur hidup MCA...f/bk

cheers.

Wayang tongkoi dah bermula...

Inilah wajah sebenar UMNO & BN pergunakan agama (hudud) untuk menyelamatkan legasi UMNO supaya kekal memerintah sampai kiamat.

Bila sebahagian pemimpin DAP tidak setuju dengan hudud,UMNO dan Hadi Awang lebelkan DAP sebagai anti-Islam.

Tetapi jika pemimpin2 dan Menteri BN terutaman MCA, MIC, GERAKAN menentang dan ugut nak letak jawatan menteri dalam kabinet sekiranya hudud dilaksanakan,kenapa UMNO dan Hadi Awang copkan MCA, MIC & GERAKAN sebagai 'anti-Islam'???

Mengapa pemimpin2 UMNO dari Najib Razak sehingga kuncu2nya di bahagian dan cawangan terus membisu bila pemimpin2 BN sendiri ugut, tolak & menentang hudud???

Sandiwara No.1...

Masih Hadi tak perasan kot...

Sandiwara No.2...

Sabah, Sarawak to go ‘separate ways’ if Parliament passes Shariah amendments...

United Sabah People’s Party president Tan Sri Joseph Kurup cautioned Putrajaya that Sabahans and Sarawakians may demand to split from peninsular Malaysia if the proposed amendments to Shariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965 are passed in Parliament.

Kurup who is also minister in the Prime Minister’s Department in charge of national unity said the Bill risks dividing East and West Malaysia and called for its withdrawal.

“If it is forced into Parliament and passed, I’m afraid it will trigger more feelings among the people of Sabah and Sarawak to go their separate ways.

“They [Federal government] shouldn’t have the slightest thought of introducing this law,” the Pensiangan MP was quoted as saying by the weekend edition of The Star daily today.

However, Kurup did not say if he would resign from the government if the proposal is passed, as some Barisan Nasional (BN) elected representatives have pledged.

“The instruction from my supreme council is, as far as my position is concerned, and the words they use is, we have to put our foot down. So, I think there is a subtle meaning to that,” he said.

Sarawak lawmakers have similarly made a firm stand in disagreeing with the passage of the proposed amendments touted as the “hudud Bill”.

“PRS (Parti Rakyat Sarawak) will not agree if the amendments involves introduction of ‘hudud’, bit by bit, into the Malaysian society,” Sarawak Deputy Chief Minister Tan Sri James Masing was quoted telling The Borneo Post yesterday.

The Borneo newspaper previously reported the PRS president saying he would instruct his party MPs to vote against the Bill at its tabling in Parliament, which he asserted was against the Federal Constitution.

Sarawak United People’s Party (SUPP) president Datuk Dr Sim Kui Hian said his party is opposed to hudud as the Malaysia Agreement 1963 states that the federation should be secular.

“For SUPP, our position is very clear — we oppose this legislation because Sarawak will never accept such a law. I am also pleased that Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Adenan Satem and Sarawak BN have stated many times that hudud laws will not be implemented in the state,” he was quoted as saying Friday by The Borneo Post.

On Thursday, fellow Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said tabled a motion to expedite the tabling of PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang’s private member’s Bill in Parliament to amend the Shariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965, also known as the “hudud” Bill.

However, Hadi surprisingly requested it to be deferred for debate at the next parliamentary meeting in October.

The Bill seeks to empower Shariah courts to enforce punishments ― except for the death penalty ― provided in Shariah laws for Islamic offences listed under state jurisdiction in the Federal Constitution, without elaborating on the nature of the punishments.

Shariah court punishments are currently limited to jail terms not exceeding three years, or whipping of not more than six strokes, or fines of not more than RM5,000.

Barisan Nasional (BN) component parties MCA and Gerakan presidents have threatened to quit their respective parties should PAS’ private members’ bill be passed in Parliament.

Umno president and Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak later sought to allay concerns about Hadi’s Bill, saying that it was not meant to implement hudud law but merely to enable the Shariah courts to impose “a few more” strokes of caning from the current maximum of six.- themalaymailonline

Lawak Minggu Ini...

Polis pening kepala, kita nantikan kecekapan & kepantasan polis 

kita bekerja berkaitan dgn skandal #1MDB..

PRK Sg.Besar/K.Kangsar - Duit dah sampai berkotak2...

cheers.

Hasan Arifin selindung kebenaran,pasai nak selamatkan...

Anggota Jawatankuasa Kira-kira Wang Negara (PAC) hairan kenapa Datuk Hasan Arifin telah bertindak sendirian memadamkan ayat-ayat daripada laporan akhir PAC berkenaan 1MDB yang memetik pendedahan Bank Negara bahawa ‘penerima manfaat Good Star Limited adalah individu yang tidak terkait dengan Petrosaudi International Limited’.

Kami kemudiannya tambah terkejut dengan kegagalan Datuk Hasan Arifin untuk mendedahkan kepada anggota PAC satu lagi surat daripada Bank Negara bertarikh 6 April 2016, sehari sebelum laporan akhir PAC dibentangkan di Parlimen. Apabila kami menyedri kewujudan surat tersebut melalui jawapan menteri di Parlimen pada 17 Mei 2016, kami telah bersemuka dengan pengerusi PAC dalam mesyuarat keesokan harinya.

Kesemua anggota PAC dari kalangan pembangkang kehilangan kata-kata apabila Datuk Hasan enggan berkongsi isi kandungan surat BNM bersama kami. Kami tidak dapat memahami dakwaan kerahsiaan Datuk Hasan apabila anggota PAC sendri pun diberi kuasa menyemak laporan Ketua Audit Negara ke atas 1MDB yang telah dikelaskan rahsia di bawah Akta Rahsia Rasmi (OSA). Apa lah agaknya yang lebih rahsia daripada dokumen OSA?

Sikap aneh Datuk Hasan membuatkan kami percaya bahawa surat BNM menjawab persoalan-persoalan PAC pastinya mengandungi maklumat-maklumat penting tentang 1MDB. Saya telah mengagak dua hari lalu bahawa BNM pastinya telah memetik nama Low Taek Jho, atau lebih dikenali sebagai Jho Low sebagai satu-satunya penerima faedah Good Star Limited dan menuntut supaya pengerusi PAC menafikan atau mengesahkan dakwaan saya.

Datuk Hasan Arifin enggan menjawab kepada media, walaupun disoal berkali-kali.

Rakyat Malaysia pastinya malu kerana harus bergantung dengan media asing, dalam hal ini The Wall Street Journal, untuk mendedahkan kebenaran yang terkandung dalam surat tersebut. Surat bertarikh 6 April 2016 daripada BNM kepada PAC jelas sekali menyatakan bahawa Good Star Limited adalah ‘dimiliki secara manfaat oleh Low Thaek Jo’ dan juga tidak ada sebarang perubahan milikan ke atas syarikat itu.

Maklumat penting ini membuka sebuah lagi kotak Pandora, dan mengesahkan dakwaan pengkritik-pengkritik seperti The Sarawak Report, The Edge Publications dan anggota-anggota Parlimen pembangkang selama ini, bahawa daripada pelaburan US$1.83 bilion 1MDB dengan Petrosaudi International Limited, sekurang-kurangnya US$1.03 bilion telah dialihkan kepada Good Star Limited, yang dimiliki Jho Low.

Bukti yang tidak boleh dipertikai ini menghancurkan dakwaaan pura-pura Datuk Seri Najib Razak serta pegawai-pegawai 1MDB bahawa Good Star Limited dimiliki Kumpulan Petrosaudi, suatu dakwaan yang tidak disokong sebarang keterangan dokumen yang boleh diterima undang-undang.

Bukti penting ini, sekiranya diambil kira oleh Ketua Audit ataupun PAC sendiri, boleh mengubah laporan PAC yang begitu berat dakwaannya, menjadi sesuatu yang lebih berat dan bahaya. Penipuan, yang sebelum ini hanya disyaki, pastinya boleh disahkan.

Malah, sekiranya Datuk Hasan Arifin mengongsikan surat BNM bersama anggota PAC, penyiasatan baru boleh dilakukan, termasuk memanggil Jho Low untuk memberi keterangan kepada PAC. Sebaliknya, beliau telah berbohong kepada anggota PAC dan mendakwa bahawa surat BNM adalah untuk matanya sahaja. Ini di samping surat itu jelas merujuk maklumat yang diberikan oleh PAC untuk dipertimbangkan.

Justeru itu, tidak syak lagi bahawa Datuk Hasan Arifin telah dicalonkan oleh Datuk Seri Najib Razak dan Barisan Nasional demi melemahkan dan menutup siasatan ke atas 1MDB. Pengerusi PAC telah menghina kedudukan parlimennya, menjadi alat untuk membantu para penyangak yang telah merompak berbilion ringgit wang pembayar cukai Malaysia.

Aku ingat Bank Negara buat laporan Polis sebab WSJ lapor cerita bohong, atau fitnah, rupanya laporan Polis dibuat kerana surat itu tertakluk di bawah Akta Rahsia Rasmi...

Beliau telah berbohong dan bertindak bertentangan dengan keputusan PAC. Beliau telah menyembunyikan bukti penting demi menutup helah dan penipuan berbilion ringgit oleh mereka yang berkuasa. Beliau telah menghalang penyiasatan parlimen ke atas skandal terbesar dalam sejarah Malaysia.

Kedudukan Datuk Hasan Arifin sebagai pengerusi PAC tidak boleh dipertahankan kerana rakyat Malaysia sudah tidak lagi percaya beliau dapat menjalankan tanggungjawab secara jujur, profesional dan dengan penuh integriti. Kami justeru itu menuntut supaya Datuk Hasan Arifin meletakkan jawatan sebagai pengerusi PAC kerana beliau telah memalukan jawatankuasa dan menghina Parlimen. - TP,Roketkini

Malaysia letters deepen mystery over fate of 1MDB cash

The Unbelievable Stup*d*ty Of Najib Razak...

I am referring to that really stupid PAS hudud bill.  First of all they got a she-man to move the bill in Parliament. But we cant venture too far in that discussion.

Pas' hudud is dead. It is a stupid and stale issue. No one believes in the hudud of PAS as relevant for Malaysia anymore. Not even the Pas. That is why the Pas split and became Amanah. The Amanah guys dont believe in the hudud of Pas either. 

Now Liow Tiong Lai has threatened to resign from the Cabinet if the Bill is passed.

The Deputy MCA Chief in Kedah (who has more guts) has already declared himself an Independent in the State Assembly in protest that the Hudud Bill was even proposed - without consultation with the BN.

Now Sarawak's SUPP (who mean business), MCA, MIC and Gerakan have made a joint statement against the stupid hudud bill. The Gerakan  chief has also threatened to resign from the Cabinet.

How does Najib expect to win Kuala Kangsar and Sg Besar by introducing the hudud bill at this critical moment?

If they think the hudud of Pas will sway Malay votes for Pas they are also mistaken. This is the West coast lah. This is not Kelantan.  Malays in the west coast are not too crazy about the hudud of Pas either.

The MIC, MCA and Gerakan are dead. Past rigor mortis. How does Najib expect the MIC, MCA and Gerakan machinery to function in Kuala Kangsar and Sg Besar when the three parties are dead against the PAS - UMNO hudud bill?  Now the Indians and Chinese in the two seats will be 100% against the BN. 

It is obvious that UMNO and PAS have come to some agreement over Kuala Kangsar and Sg Besar.  It is another inconvenient marriage of convenience. That is the reason for the sudden hudud of PAS popping up again. Its election time again.  Never trust these religious people. They are the world's biggest liars.

Pas' hudud bill was moved by UMNO !! And PAS is going against UMNO in Kuala Kangsar ! Something does not jive. Actually it does.

Voting for PAS is going to be the same as voting for UMNO.

The Chinese and Indians will not come out to vote for either PAS or UMNO in Kuala Kangsar. They will stay at home.

The Malay vote may split but no big deal. A vote for PAS is a vote for Najib as well. Maybe this is going to be the model of cooperation between UMNO and PAS in the next GE.

My view is if either PKR or Amanah run in Kuala Kangsar they may win. The Chinese and Indians will support anyone other than UMNO - PAS. Plus a substantial number of Malays as well. Amanah must seriously consider fielding a candidate in Kuala Kangsar.  Amanah may just win.

But UMNO supporting the hudud of PAS will have major repercussions on the BN component parties. The BN may just break up.

What if SUPP pulls out of the BN? What if MCA, MIC and Gerakan pull out of the BN? That will be 18 seats gone. (MCA 7, MIC 4, Gerakan 1 and SUPP 6?)   Five more seats and Najib will lose his perch in Parliament.

As I said the MCA, MIC and Gerakan are dead anyway. They have nothing to lose. 

To support the hudud of PAS is an unbelievably stupid move. I dont know which moron is advising the super moron on strategy. It must be  super, super moron. 

Last but not least is a really threatening statement by the MCA Youth Chief :

- MCA has to review working model in BN said Youth chief Chong Sin Woon
- PAS would not have successfully tabled Bill without Umno, he added
- We strongly oppose such irresponsible behaviour
- Such actions marred spirit of alliance in BN 
- Chong added MCA would not compromise 
- Party VP Chew Mei Fun criticised Azalina for arbitrarily raising hudud 
- Her actions violate spirit of BN 
- "She owes BN components an explanation,” Chew posted on FB
- Koh Chin Han said arbitrary actions lack accountability, irresponsible against principles of BN 
- MCA will not support any hudud Bill 
- Gan Ping Siew condemned Umno’s collaboration with PAS
- Umno playing dangerous game to implement unconstitutional Islamic criminal laws
- move undermined relationship between Barisan component parties
- blatant breach of decision-making process to bypass BN supreme council 

I say MCA, MIC and Gerakan - at this point in time the UMNO guys dont even care about their party members or the Malays. They only care about themselves. Do you seriously expect them to care about you - Chinese, Indians, Dayaks and Kadazans?

You also cannot be so stupid. You must grow up.- syedsoutsidethebox

MCA leader slams Hadi's 'sneaky tactic' to disguise hudud bid

Pengundi2 Parlimen sg besar... duit dah mai.. 1 kontena.. Sapa nak duit kena pangkah BN. Perlu tunjuk bukti pangkah BN..ambil gambar kertas undi yg di pangkah selepas itu keluar dari pusat mengundi terus ke pusat perayu undi. Ambil duit dan tunjukkan gambar yg di pangkah. Baru dapat duit...

cheers.

Bos MCA balun UMNO kaw2 dalam akhbar Cina...

Tatkala Presiden Pas dilapor mengecam DAP kerana membantah pembentangan Rang Undang-undang Persendirian mengenai Rang Undang-undang Mahkamah Syariah (Bidang Kuasa Jenayah) (Pindaan) 2016 oleh beliau di Dewan Rakyat petang semalam, tanpa disedari parti komponen BN khususnya MCA yang dipuji beliau kerana 'lebih beradab' rupa-rupanya turut mengecam tindakan Ahli Parlimen Marang itu.

Presiden MCA Liow Tiong Lai dilaporkan menyerang Umno dan Pas secara terbuka dalam isu pembentangan rang undang-undang berkaitan hudud di parlimen, lapor Malaysiakini.

Dalam wawancaranya dengan akhbar Cina, Liow menuduh Umno bersekongkol dengan Pas dan mengkhianati semangat BN.

"MCA akan bincangkan perkara ini dengan anggota komponen lain BN," beliau dipetik sebagai berkata oleh Sin Chew Daily.

Presiden MCA Liow Tiong Lai kini dilaporkan menyerang Umno secara terbuka dalam isu pembentangan rang undang-undang berkaitan hudud di parlimen.

Dalam wawancaranya dengan akhbar Cina, beliau menuduh Umno bersekongkol dengan PAS dan mengkhianati semangat BN.

“MCA akan bincangkan perkara ini dengan anggota komponen lain BN,” beliau dipetik sebagai berkata oleh Sin Chew Daily.

Nanyang Siang Pau pula melaporkan Liow sebagai berkata anggota komponen BN tidak tahu menahu berkaitan perkembangan itu dan menyalahkan Umno kerana mewujudkan krisis perlembagaan.

Beliau akan membangkitkan isu itu dalam mesyuarat kabinet hari ini dan mengadakan sidang media bersama anggota lain BN bagi menyatakan pendirian mereka, lapor Oriental Daily pula.

Kerajaan semalam memberikan keutamaan untuk pindaan Akta 355 dibincangkan di Dewan Rakyat. Bagaimanapun Hadi memohon ia ditangguhkan ke sesi akan datang kerana kesuntukan masa.

Pindaan itu bertujuan menambahkan bidang kuasa mahkamah syariah.

Usul mempercepatkan perbahasan itu dibawa oleh Menteri di Jabatan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said dan disokong oleh Timbalan Menteri Kerja Raya Rosnah Abdul Rashid Shirlin. - mk

MCA boss opens fire on Umno in Chinese newspapers

Kedah exco quits MCA in protest of Hudud Bill

Tangguh usul pindaan: Apa niat sebenar Hadi?

BNM letter says Jho Low owns Good Star...

A letter from Bank Negara Malaysia has allegedly confirmed that Jho Low is the owner of Good Star Limited (GSL).

The letter dated April 6, purportedly from Bank Negara Malaysia to Public Accounts Committee Chairman Hasan Ariffin, has been posted on the website of the Wall Street Journal.

Investigations into 1Malaysia Development Berhad had shown that GSL had received USD1.03 billion (RM4.2 billion) from 1MDB.

The ownership of GSL attracted controversy after Opposition members in the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) accused its chairman Hasan Arifin of deleting two sentences in the final report which were related to GSL.

The key sentence the Opposition PAC members claimed that had been deleted stated that Bank Negara had been informed by the relevant overseas authorities on a voluntary basis that the ultimate beneficiary of Good Star Limited was an individual unrelated to the Petrosaudi group.

Finance Minister Najib Razak had said in a parliamentary reply recently that GSL was owned by Petrosaudi International Ltd, based on the state investment arm’s records.

“The payments were made so that 1MDB could obtain a 40 per cent stake in a joint venture,” he said in a written reply to Petaling Jaya Utara Member of Parliament Tony Pua. Najib added that Petrosaudi had acknowledged receiving the payments.

International investigators probing the transactions of 1MDB and related financial institutions had said that they found an intricate web of firms and movement of funds, likely to conceal the transactions and the beneficiaries.

Among other things, the letter states that a letter from Petrosaudi that it owns GSL contradicts what BNM had learned from authorities in foreign countries.

It says these foreign authorities had informed BNM that the “beneficial owner” of GSL was Jho Low.

“Based on information from the authority (the authority responsible for the incorporation of companies who has the register of members) BSL is beneficially owned by Low Taek Jho,” the letter reads.

Another unnamed foreign authority revealed that GSL applied to open an account at RBS Coutts AG, Zurich, on June 9, 2009.

“Based on information in the application, the sole director and the bearer of the single bearer share in GSL appears to be Smart Power Ltd, and the sole director and bearer of the single bearer share in Smart Power appears to be Jho Low,” according to the purported letter from BNM.

The authority also said Jho Low appeared to be the only beneficial owner of the account at RBS Coutts. - fmt

Terang2 tertera pendedahan dari WSJ mengenai isi kandungan surat Bank Negara M'sia (BNM) 'sahkan' Good Star Ltd milik Jho Low. Pasai itulah gomen mengklasifikasikan segala kandungan yg berkaitan 1MDB sebagai sulit di bawah Akta Rahsia Rasmi 1972 AGAR RAKYAT TAK BOLEH TAHU  PERKARA dan FAKTA SEBENAR 1MDB...

Dokumen tak palsu, ori. Sekarang satu Malaysia dah tahu. Gold Star Limited(GSL) Jho Low punya.  GSL bukan anak syarikat Petrosaudi dan tiada kaitan dengan bisnes 1MDB. 

Jadi macam mana berbilion2 RM duit 1MDB boleh mengalir masuk ke akaun GSL Jho Low? Pihak2 tertentu di Malaysia melindungi Jho Low. 

Dan pihak2 tertentu tersebut sedang frust hingga menggigit jari kerana terkantoi satu lagi penipuan yang dia berusaha nak tutup sampai mati. - a.world

It is too late for Najib to leave the country. Which country will he go to?

Maybe Saudi Arabia - that country harbours all sorts of criminals as well.

The Singaporean prosecutors have begun their work.  

The Swiss prosecutors will be charging people in court soon.

This is beyond smoking gun already.

Someone should make a Police Report against the PAC Chairman Hassan whatever for tampering with evidence and / or altering an official report with intention to cover up evidence. 

By the way Jho Low's super yacht Equanimity (bought with money stolen from us) is sailing somewhere in the Coral Sea... - syedsoutsidethebox

UMNO dah faham hudud. Cuba teka sapa penangguhnya pula...

cheers.

Ambik kau 1MDB...

Sokong 101%, 1MDB adalah idea paling bengong dimana wang dari dana awam (Tabung Haji dan LTAT) digunakan untuk membuat pelaburan dengan harapan mendapat keuntungan dari keringat rakyat. 

Akhirnya 1MDB bukan saja menjadi liabiliti pada kerajaan tetapi rakyat menanggung akibatnya...f/bk

Story kat sini...

MB Terengganu Razif Terkena 'Badi'Najib...

Kerajaan Negeri Terengganu sambut Hari Guru semalam di Stadium Gong Badak. Guru-guru bercerita bahawa tiada yang tepuk tangan ketika Encik Razif berucap. Beliau dimalukan oleh guru-guru sekolah kerajaan. Akibatnya, Pengarah Jabatan Pendidikan Terengganu arah semua guru berhimpun hari ini di sekolah masing-masing berlatih tepuk tangan selama 5 minit tanpa pengecualian. Kemudian wajib hantar gambar latihan bertepuk tangan kepada pengarah. 

Nampaknya penolakan masyarakat terhadap Razif sebagai Menteri Besar terserlah. Kebiasaannya warga guru bukanlah jenis yang suka tunjuk boikotnya dalam majlis-majlis kerajaan. Jika mereka bencikan kerajaan Umno BN, mereka jadi 'silence voters'. Tetapi fenomena sekarang, guru-guru berani bersuara dalam facebook, di kedai-kedai kopi, terkadang di pejabat secara terang-terangan. Saya punya ramai kenalan guru yang boleh jadi bukti dan saksi. 

Semalam, ada guru KAFA yang bercerita, mereka tidak pergi pun ke program di Hulu Takir semalam walaupun sudah menaiki bas yang disediakan. Dua bas yang membawa guru KAFA diarahkan polis untuk berpatah balik kerana ada isu teknikal, menyebabkan mereka melencong ke tempat lain. Betapa gembiranya guru-guru KAFA tersebut kerana tidak perlu menghadiri majlis bersama Najib dan Razif. 

Jika rakyat Malaysia umumnya sudah menolak Najib, maka nasib Encik Razif juga pun begitu juga. 

Justeru, saya rasa insiden-insiden sebegini ini boleh jadi suatu petunjuk bencinya masyarakat umum terhadap Razif khususnya, dan kepada Umno BN umumnya. Jika ini berlarutan dalam majlis-majlis lain juga, maka saya rasa ada signal kuat supaya kerajaan Umno BN Terengganu patut ditukar sebelum masanya tiba iaitu tidak perlu menunggu PRU14. Jika mahu pilihan yang lebih baik, maka saya cabar Umno BN desak Najib bubar Parlimen terus! - Wan Mohd Faizul Wan Abas

Isu arahan latihan tepuk tangan, JPN Terengganu beri penjelasan

Teka-teki Hudud

PAS admits cooperation with UMNO, to use hudud for polls...

PAS will use the hudud issue to campaign in the upcoming by-elections, where the majority of voters for both seats are Malays, said its Youth chief Nik Abduh Nik Abdul Aziz

This is after the Islamic party was successful in tabling the Hudud Bill in the Dewan Rakyat this afternoon.

Nik Abduh also admitted PAS received cooperation from Umno, without which the Private Member's Bill would not have been slated for debate since it was listed as the last item on the Parliament's Order Paper.

"We will highlight this issue (hudud) in the by-elections. Umno may also highlight the issue - everyone has a right to do so or otherwise," he told reporters at the Parliament lobby.

He said voters in Sungai Besar and Kuala Kangsar would be given an "early explanation" on the issue.

Asked about DAP's claim that the successful tabling of the bill proved PAS was working with Umno, Nik Abduh confirmed this.

"It is not a claim. The cooperation exists but only on matters of mutual interest.

"We have always been clear about it but there are some who think we cannot cooperate with the federal government," he added.

Nik Abduh said the tabling of the bill showcased the kind of cooperation that PAS had alluded to.

"We thank the courageous House speaker and government for allowing a Private Member's Bill for the very first time," he added.

The bill, tabled by PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang, is often referred to as the Hudud Bill but is specifically to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965 or Act 355.

At present, Act 355 limits the Syariah Courts punishment to a maximum fine of RM5,000, three years jail or six strokes of the whip.

The amendment seeks to increase this limit to pave the way for partial implementation of hudud, where punishment using the whip, for example, would be between 40 and 100 strokes.

However, Hadi later asked that the bill be debated in the next Parliament session, citing the need to give MPs more time to prepare.- mk

Terima usul Hudud,UMNO berjaya kunci mulut PAS 

Hadi: Terima Kasih Kerajaang...

Story kat SINI SINI SINI dan SINI   

Story kat sini   

cheers.